Statistical Learning Theory

We study a general class of optimization problems with decision variable $\boldsymbolΘ \in \mathbb{R}^{p \times k}$ and cost function which is the sum of $n$ terms, each dependent on $\boldsymbolΘ$ through the $k$-dimensional projection $\boldsymbolΘ^\top \boldsymbol{x}_i$, where $\boldsymbol{x}_i$, $i \leq n$ are i.i.d. random vectors. This setting is general enough to include examples of current interest in statistical physics, high-dimensional statistics, and statistical learning theory. We consider the proportional asymptotics $n, p \to \infty$, with $n/p = Θ(1)$, and prove that, whenever there exists a minimizer satisfying a suitable generalization of a "delocalization" condition, the minimum value is universal. Namely, (for subgaussian $\boldsymbol{x}_i$) it depends on the distribution of $\boldsymbol{x}_i$ only through its asymptotic mean and covariance. This delocalization condition is essentially necessary. Earlier universality results for such problems were limited to strongly convex loss functions. We derive applications of our theory to statistical learning and prove general universality results both for train and (under additional conditions) test error. In particular, we establish universality for vectors $\boldsymbol{x}_i$ generated by random 1-layer neural networks (random features models) and first-order Taylor approximations of 2-layer networks (neural tangent models). Finally, we establish that the delocalization property holds for a class of statistical learning problems under a condition that is easy to verify.

The problem of linear predictions has been extensively studied for the past century under pretty generalized frameworks. Recent advances in the robust statistics literature allow us to analyze robust versions of classical linear models through the prism of Median of Means (MoM). Combining these approaches in a piecemeal way might lead to ad-hoc procedures, and the restricted theoretical conclusions that underpin each individual contribution may no longer be valid. To meet these challenges coherently, in this study, we offer a unified robust framework that includes a broad variety of linear prediction problems on a Hilbert space, coupled with a generic class of loss functions. Notably, we do not require any assumptions on the distribution of the outlying data points ($\mathcal{O}$) nor the compactness of the support of the inlying ones ($\mathcal{I}$). Under mild conditions on the dual norm, we show that for misspecification level $ε$, these estimators achieve an error rate of $O(\max\left\{|\mathcal{O}|^{1/2}n^{-1/2}, |\mathcal{I}|^{1/2}n^{-1} \right\}+ε)$, matching the best-known rates in literature. This rate is slightly slower than the classical rates of $O(n^{-1/2})$, indicating that we need to pay a price in terms of error rates to obtain robust estimates. Additionally, we show that this rate can be improved to achieve so-called "fast rates" under additional assumptions.

The last decade of progress in machine learning (ML), especially the deep learning era, has raised a number of scientific questions that challenge the longstanding dogma of the field. One of the most important riddles was the good empirical generalization of overparameterized models. Overparameterized models are highly complex with respect to the size of the training dataset, which enables them to perfectly fit (i.e., interpolate) even noisy training data. Such interpolation of noisy data is traditionally associated with detrimental overfitting, and yet a wide range of interpolating models -- from simple linear models to deep neural networks -- have been observed to generalize remarkably well on fresh test data. Indeed, the discovery of the double descent phenomenon has revealed that highly overparameterized models can improve over the best underparameterized model in test performance. Understanding learning in this overparameterized regime required new theory and foundational empirical studies, even for the simplest case of the linear model. The underpinnings of this understanding have been laid in foundational analyses of overparameterized linear regression and related statistical learning tasks, mostly published between 2018 and 2022, which resulted in precise analytic characterizations of double descent. This paper provides an overview of the theory of overparameterized ML (henceforth abbreviated as TOPML) by focusing on explaining the most foundational findings through a statistical signal processing perspective. We emphasize the unique aspects that define the TOPML research area as a subfield of modern ML theory and outline interesting open frontiers that remain.

We study learning to learn through the lens of hyperparameter tuning. We propose the Langevin Gradient Descent Algorithm (LGD), which approximates the mean of the posterior distribution defined by the loss function and regularizer of a regression task with convex objective. For classification tasks, the LGD algorithm estimates the posterior probabilities of each class on the test set. We prove the existence of an optimal hyperparameter configuration for which the LGD algorithm achieves the Bayes' optimal solution for squared loss on regression tasks, and for which LGD closely approximates the posterior probabilities for well-specified classification tasks. Subsequently, we study generalization guarantees on meta learning optimal hyperparameters for the LGD algorithm from a given set of tasks in the data-driven setting. For a number of parameters $d$ and hyperparameter dimension $h$, we show a pseudo-dimension bound of $O(dh)$, up to logarithmic terms under mild assumptions on LGD. This matches the dependence of the bounds on number of parameters obtained in prior work for linear regression using the elastic net, which only allows for $h=2$ hyperparameters, and extends their bounds to regression on convex loss. Compared to bounds on regularized logistic regression that allow for only $h=1$ hyperparameter, our bounds improve greatly on the dependence on samples per task at the cost of worse dependence on the number of parameters by accounting for hardware-aware procedures. Finally, we show empirical evidence of the success of LGD and the meta learning procedure for few-shot learning on linear and logistic regression using synthetically created datasets.

Machine learning theory studies learning procedures through mathematical setups in which the data model, training protocol, oracle access, loss, metric, and randomness define the phenomenon that a theorem is meant to explain. Solving an open problem therefore requires the problem formulation, theorem target, and proof mechanism to be developed in concert. Researchers formulate hypotheses, test them through preliminary theoretical or empirical analysis, and refine both assumptions and proofs. We investigate whether this process can be organized as an autonomous agentic workflow for ML theory research. We develop VALG, an agentic system that combines multi-level Verification, Adaptive formulation of Learning-theory problems, and Graph-structured proof development. Within each source-relative theorem branch, VALG maintains a fixed mathematical specification, checks the theorem-level composition of a typed proof-dependency graph, and constructs and reviews local proofs in dependency order. When a proof attempt fails, VALG identifies whether the obstruction lies in a derivation, the proof structure, or the theorem formulation and routes the next attempt accordingly. Formulation-level obstructions initiate an explicitly related variant or relaxation, preserving the mathematical relation between the resulting theorem and the source problem. We evaluate VALG on nine subproblems from five COLT 2026 open problems. Two runs produce internally finalized theorem candidates that match the scope of their source briefs; the remaining seven yield restricted-method results, special cases, or conditional theorems. These case studies show how VALG keeps source-scope matches, relaxations, conditional results, and blocked attempts mathematically distinct. VALG is open source at https://github.com/DechenZhang/VALG-ML-Theory-Agent.