Structured Reasoning in Language Models

Hierarchical text classification (HTC) assigns documents to multiple levels of a pre-defined taxonomy. Automated patent subject classification represents one of the hardest HTC scenarios because of professional difficulties and extensive labels. Prior approaches only output a flat label set, which offers little insight into the reason behind predictions. Therefore, we propose Reasoning for Hierarchical Classification (RHC), a novel framework that reformulates HTC as a step-by-step reasoning task to sequentially deduce hierarchical labels. RHC trains large language models (LLMs) in two stages: a cold-start stage that aligns outputs with chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning format and a reinforcement learning (RL) stage to enhance multi-step reasoning ability. RHC demonstrates four advantages in our experiments. (1) Effectiveness: RHC surpasses previous baselines and outperforms the supervised fine-tuning counterparts by approximately 3% in accuracy and macro F1. (2) Explainability: RHC produces natural-language justifications before prediction to facilitate human inspection. (3) Scalability: RHC scales favorably with model size with larger gains compared to standard fine-tuning. (4) Applicability: Beyond patents, we further demonstrate that RHC achieves state-of-the-art performance on other widely used HTC benchmarks, which highlights its broad applicability.

Despite the remarkable reasoning capabilities of large language models, they still struggle with one-shot relation extraction without predefined relation labels. We identify two pitfalls: models are often misled by irrelevant tokens instead of relation-conveying semantics, and they often fail to align with the abstraction level human annotators expect. We introduce a novel framework that closes this gap with two components: (1) COGRE, a cognitively-inspired reasoning framework that structures RE into a series of processes mimicking human text-processing; and (2) HIT@DICT, a reinforcement learning intermediate reward strategy that encourages reasoning to align with relational labels by rewarding relation-relevant phrases in reasoning. The reward is derived on a credit dictionary automatically extracted from correct predictions. Our experiments show that our framework improves both accuracy and explanation quality by addressing these two pitfalls. For example, COGRE with Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct on One-shot NYT29 achieves 24.65% F1, surpassing prior reasoning-based designs. Optimizing this approach with RL using HIT@DICT further improves performance by +23.46% points. Finally, human evaluation shows that our best model generates relational phrases closely aligned with gold labels, increasing human explanation quality ratings by 54% (relative).

Large Language Models (LLMs) tend to generate a long reasoning chain when solving complex tasks. However, as the reasoning chain extends, critical intermediate steps and the original prompt will be buried in the context, receiving insufficient attention and leading to errors. In this work, we present ATAR, a novel reasoning method that leverages the inherent reasoning structure to steer LLM attention. Our experiments show that ATAR outperforms SOTA methods across six benchmarks, achieving up to 15.39% absolute improvement. Furthermore, with ATAR, "non-reasoning" models achieve comparable or even better performance compared to reasoning models of the same size in most benchmarks. Finally, our ablation studies show that the attention alignment component contributes significantly, and that these improvements are persist under different attentionsteering backends.

Many LLMs plan before they act, yet planning and execution are often still entangled in one long generation trace, enforced only through prompts, or split across separate components. We argue that these two stages call for different computation: planning benefits from diversity and breadth, whereas execution demands precision and faithful adherence to a chosen strategy. Treating them as a single undifferentiated chain wastes tokens on routine derivation and makes it costly to explore alternative strategies at test time. We present the Explore-Execute Chain (E\textsuperscript{2}C), which keeps both stages in one model but separates them structurally: a stochastic Exploration phase drafts a concise high-level plan, and a deterministic Execution phase carries it out. Causal SFT and RL train this split so that exploration stays informative and execution remains plan-faithful. Once plans are short yet decisive, extra inference compute can be directed to exploration rather than to repeatedly decoding full solutions. On AIME'2024 at $K{=}32$, E\textsuperscript{2}C-ReAct Loop reaches 53.3% accuracy with only 12.4k tokens, outperforming Tree-of-Thoughts ($N{=}32$: 50.0%, 71.3k). The same structure also supports lightweight domain adaptation: Exploration-Focused SFT (EF-SFT) updates only the planning phase, uses 3.5% of the tokens required by standard SFT, and improves medical benchmark accuracy by up to 14.5%.

Large language models (LLMs) hold significant potential for psychological support, capable of generating empathetic responses and simulating therapeutic conversations. However, existing LLM-based approaches often lack sufficient grounding in structured diagnostic reasoning and diverse therapeutic strategies, limiting their effectiveness in complex counseling scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose PsyLLM, the first large language model designed to incorporate diagnostic- and therapeutic-oriented reasoning for mental health counseling. To develop PsyLLM, we design a novel automated data synthesis pipeline that processes real-world mental health posts collected from Reddit, where users frequently express psychological distress and seek community support. The pipeline transforms these posts into multi-turn counseling dialogues and leverages LLMs guided by international diagnostic standards (e.g., DSM/ICD) and multiple therapeutic frameworks (e.g., CBT, ACT, psychodynamic) to generate structured, clinically informed reasoning traces. A rigorous multi-dimensional filtering mechanism further improves the quality and clinical fidelity of the synthesized dialogue data. In addition, we introduce a new benchmark and evaluation protocol, assessing counseling performance across four key dimensions. Our experiments, along with evaluations by professional counseling experts, demonstrate that PsyLLM consistently outperforms various baseline models on this benchmark. Code, data, and models are available at https://github.com/Emo-gml/PsyLLM.