Adaptive and oblivious statistical adversaries are equivalent

We study the problem of \emph{adversarially robust} PAC learning. In this framework, the learner observes independent samples from an unknown distribution over $\mathcal{X} \times \{0,1\}$, as in classical PAC learning. However, given a perturbation map $\mathcal{U} : \mathcal{X} \to 2^{\mathcal{X}}$ known to the learner, the goal is to output, with high probability, a predictor that correctly classifies \emph{every} perturbation $z \in \mathcal{U}(x)$ of most future examples $(x,y)$ drawn from the same underlying distribution. We determine the \emph{optimal} $\mathcal{U}$-independent sample complexity of this problem in both the realizable and agnostic settings. More specifically, for every concept class $\mathcal{H}$ of $\operatorname{VC}$ dimension $d$, we prove upper bounds of $\mathcal{O} \big( d/ε+ \log(1/δ)/ε\big)$ in the realizable setting and $\mathcal{O} \big( d/ε^2 + \log(1/δ)/ε^2 \big)$ in the agnostic setting, together with an optimal first-order refinement of the latter. These bounds match the corresponding lower bounds for classical PAC learning. Consequently, and perhaps surprisingly, adversarial robustness incurs \emph{no additional} distribution-free statistical cost, uniformly over all perturbation maps. Our bounds improve exponentially on those of [Montasser, Hanneke, and Srebro; COLT '19]. On the technical side, we present short and elementary proofs based on a new algorithmic principle that we call \emph{binomial-bagging}. We believe that binomial-bagging and its analysis may be of independent interest.

We study the extent to which standard machine learning algorithms rely on exchangeability and independence of data by introducing a monotone adversarial corruption model. In this model, an adversary, upon looking at a "clean" i.i.d. dataset, inserts additional "corrupted" points of their choice into the dataset. These added points are constrained to be monotone corruptions, in that they get labeled according to the ground-truth target function. Perhaps surprisingly, we demonstrate that in this setting, all known optimal learning algorithms for binary classification can be made to achieve suboptimal expected error on a new independent test point drawn from the same distribution as the clean dataset. On the other hand, we show that uniform convergence-based algorithms do not degrade in their guarantees. Our results showcase how optimal learning algorithms break down in the face of seemingly helpful monotone corruptions, exposing their overreliance on exchangeability.

Following Goldwasser, Rothblum, Shafer, and Yehudayoff, who defined a framework for interactive proofs of learning [ITCS'21], we initiate the study of non-interactive proofs of learning. We define and study a new notion: Publicly-Verifiable Certificates of Statistical Validity (pvCSVs), which allow for public, distributionally-robust certification that the result of a learning algorithm is valid. In a pvCSV, a learner publishes a hypothesis $h$ and corresponding certificate $π$; then, any user, who holds a user-specific distribution, can read the pair $(h,π)$ and determine efficiently whether the hypothesis is valid according to the user-specific distribution. We construct pvCSVs in the context of Adaptive Statistical Query (SQ) Algorithms. To certify SQ algorithms that makes $k$ adaptive queries, we construct pvCSVs where the sample complexity scales with $O(\log k)$, whereas the sample complexity of the best learning algorithms scale with $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{k})$. More generally, we study proof systems for learning in the SQ model, demonstrating the model's strengths as well as its limitations.