SurgXBench: Explainable Vision-Language Model Benchmark for Surgery

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models represent a promising direction for embodied intelligence in surgical robotics. Despite the prevalence of VLA benchmarks for general robotics, standardized evaluation platforms specifically designed for surgical contexts remain absent. To address this limitation, we present SurgVLA-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating VLA models in laparoscopic surgical robotics. Leveraging the SurRoL simulation platform, we construct a hierarchical task taxonomy ranging from atomic actions to complete surgical procedures, complemented by a multi-dimensional evaluation framework assessing action accuracy and semantic consistency. We then systematically evaluate two representative paradigms, including autoregressive models such as OpenVLA, and flow matching models such as $π_{0}$, $π_{0.5}$, and SmolVLA. Our experiments show that autoregressive models tend to excel in semantic understanding, while flow matching models often achieve higher task precision but may face generalization trade-offs. However, even the best-performing models remain far from satisfactory, as the constrained endoscopic field of view, restricted viewing angles, and frequent occlusions persist as fundamental physical bottlenecks. The code and data are available at https://github.com/VCL-HNU/SurgVLA

Purpose: Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising performance in surgical visual question answering (VQA). However, existing surgical VQA datasets often contain linguistic shortcuts, where question phrasing implicitly constrains the answer space. It remains unclear whether reported performance reflects visual understanding or reliance on such linguistic shortcuts. Methods: We introduce SurgCheck, a diagnostic benchmark for quantifying linguistic shortcut reliance in surgical VQA. SurgCheck employs a paired-question design in which each surgical frame is associated with an original question containing entity names and a less-biased counterpart that removes these names while preserving identical visual content and ground-truth answers. The resulting performance gap provides a diagnostic signal of shortcut reliance. To ensure that the less-biased question remains well-defined even without entity names, four grounding cues are incorporated: bounding box, arrow, spatial position, and periphrasis. We evaluate both general-purpose and surgical-specific VLMs under zero-shot and fine-tuned settings on SurgCheck. To evaluate open-ended zero-shot responses, we introduce an LLM-as-a-judge evaluation protocol. Results: Using SurgCheck, we observe consistent performance degradation on less-biased questions across five VLMs, despite identical visual inputs. Text-only ablation reveals minimal performance drops for action and target prediction, indicating that action and target prediction is largely driven by linguistic shortcuts rather than visual reasoning. Conclusion: SurgCheck provides a controlled diagnostic framework that exposes failure modes masked by linguistic bias in existing surgical VQA benchmarks. Our findings demonstrate that strong benchmark performance does not necessarily imply faithful visual understanding, underscoring the need for bias-aware evaluation in surgical VQA.

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is central to modern surgery, driving the need for intelligent systems with accurate scene understanding. Most existing surgical AI methods rely on isolated, task-specific models, leading to fragmented pipelines with limited interpretability and no unified understanding of RAS scene. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) offer strong zero-shot reasoning, but struggle with hallucinations, domain gaps and weak task-interdependency modeling. To address the lack of unified data for RAS scene understanding, we introduce SurgCoTBench, the first reasoning-focused benchmark in RAS, covering 14256 QA pairs with frame-level annotations across five major surgical tasks. Building on SurgCoTBench, we propose SurgRAW, a clinically aligned Chain-of-Thought (CoT) driven agentic workflow for zero-shot multi-task reasoning in surgery. SurgRAW employs a hierarchical reasoning workflow where an orchestrator divides surgical scene understanding into two reasoning streams and directs specialized agents to generate task-level reasoning, while higher-level agents capture workflow interdependencies or ground output clinically. Specifically, we propose a panel discussion mechanism to ensure task-specific agents collaborate synergistically and leverage on task interdependencies. Similarly, we incorporate a retrieval-augmented generation module to enrich agents with surgical knowledge and alleviate domain gaps in general VLMs. We design task-specific CoT prompts grounded in surgical domain to ensure clinically aligned reasoning, reduce hallucinations and enhance interpretability. Extensive experiments show that SurgRAW surpasses mainstream VLMs and agentic systems and outperforms a supervised model by 14.61% accuracy. Dataset and code is available at https://github.com/jinlab-imvr/SurgRAW.git .