On the $O(\frac{\sqrt{d}}{K^{1/4}})$ Convergence Rate of AdamW Measured by $\ell_1$ Norm

AdamW is the de facto optimizer for training large language models (LLMs), yet the theory behind it still lives mostly in finite-variance regimes. This is increasingly unsatisfying, as empirical evidence indicates that stochastic gradient noise in LLM pretraining is typically heavy-tailed. Recent work shows that sign-based optimizers such as Lion and Muon achieve sharp heavy-tailed rates, and that AdaGrad can also converge under heavy-tailed noise. However, no rigorous convergence theory for AdamW has yet been established in this regime. Can AdamW converge under the same heavy-tailed assumptions, or does its second-moment accumulator create a genuine obstruction? We formulate this as an open problem, prove a positive weighted-metric benchmark, and give a corridor lower-bound mechanism showing how denominator memory can hide large gradients.

We establish the first convergence guarantees for the plain vector-form Adam optimizer under heavy-tailed stochastic noise. While several Adam variants are known to achieve optimal iteration complexity in bounded-variance nonsmooth nonconvex optimization, little is understood about their behavior when stochastic gradients admit only a bounded $p$-th central moment for some $p \in (1,2]$, a setting increasingly observed in modern deep learning. To address this gap, we generalize the recent online-to-nonconvex conversion framework to accommodate heavy-tailed martingale-difference noise. Building on this generalized framework, we develop a discounted regret analysis for Adam, without restrictive parameter coupling. Our results show that Adam converges to $(ρ,ε)$-stationary points under heavy-tailed noise. However, it exhibits a suboptimal iteration complexity and $p$-dependent convergence, a suboptimality that persists even in the bounded-variance case ($p=2$). Specifically, the $ε$-dominant term in the iteration complexity for reaching in-expectation stationarity is $T=\mathrm{O}\left(Δρ^{1/2}(G+σ)^{\frac{5p}{3p-4}}ε^{-\left(\frac{5p}{3p-4}+\frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)$ for $p\in(\frac{4}{3},2]$, which simplifies to $T=\mathrm{O}(ε^{-13/2})$ when $p=2$. When the domain radius is known and used to control the online-learner output, a standard setup in related literature, the convergence rate improves to match the optimal complexity. In this case, the $ε$-dominant iteration complexity is $T=\mathrm{O}\left(Δρ^{1/2}(G+σ)^{\frac{p}{p-1}}ε^{-\left(\frac{p}{p-1}+\frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)$ for $p\in(1,2]$, which simplifies to $T=\mathrm{O}(ε^{-7/2})$ when $p=2$. These findings provide new theoretical insight into the robustness and limitations of Adam in heavy-tailed regimes.

Adam is one of the most widely implemented and influential modern optimizers. Why is it effective across different optimization problems in practice? This question arguably lies at the center of the optimization community over the last decade and has motivated a substantial body of work aimed at understanding its convergence behavior. However, existing studies have mainly focused on the convergence rate of Adam in smooth nonconvex optimization, which unfortunately does not adequately capture practical settings, since many real-world problems are nonsmooth, such as those arising in training neural networks. Thus, these studies cannot fully explain the popularity and empirical success of Adam. Recently, an insightful and powerful framework called Online-to-Nonconvex Conversion has opened a new way to analyze Adam for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. Unfortunately, prior works along this line share two common limitations. First, all of them ignore the important bias-correction term in the original Adam algorithm. Second and more importantly, many of them require extra operations that are not used in Adam, such as a clipping step. Therefore, the convergence guarantee for the original Adam method still remains unclear. In this work, we present the first finite-time analysis for the classical form of Adam, i.e., with the bias-correction step and without further algorithmic modifications, and prove that a randomly scaled learning rate ensures a convergence rate of $1/T^{\frac{2}{13}}$ for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. Moreover, our result provably applies to the modern heavy-tailed noise regime, which is closer to practice. Interestingly, our theory is established under the parameter choice $β_1=β_2$, aligning with the recent empirical studies.