Local Learning Rules for Out-of-Equilibrium Physical Generative Models

Generative thermodynamic computers turn thermal noise into structured data through Langevin dynamics. We train these systems with a local update at each integration step. The reverse-path Onsager-Machlup objective yields a coupling gradient that is a symmetric sum of local residual-state correlations. We apply this gradient immediately rather than accumulating it over a full trajectory. In digital simulations using MNIST prototypes, online and trajectory-batch training reach similar validation losses on fixed noising paths. Models trained online release less heat on average in all five independently seeded pairs, with both models' parameters held fixed during sampling. Auxiliary classifier and nearest-prototype measures change modestly, while pairwise diversity decreases. The response to noise depends strongly on where the errors enter: independent zero-mean errors in the formed updates produce little heat change over a finite range of noise amplitudes, whereas residual offset and temporal correlation have much larger effects. Storing trained couplings requires substantially less precision than resolving deterministic updates during training. Together, these results establish a local online training method and show how update timing, noise structure, and precision affect generative thermodynamic computing.

Score-based Generative Models (SGMs) have achieved impressive performance in data generation across a wide range of applications. While the statistical properties of their sampling procedures are increasingly well understood, the optimization dynamics underlying their training remain less explored. SGMs are typically trained by minimizing a weighted denoising scorematching objective, yet optimization guarantees with stochastic gradients remain limited. In this work, we study Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) for SGMs, contributing results in two complementary regimes. First, for general score parameterizations, we establish a non-convex convergence rate for SGD on the weighted denoising score-matching objective, with explicit dependence on the schedule-dependent weighting factors. Second, for overparameterized two-layer ReLU networks, we develop a Neural Tangent Kernel analysis tailored to diffusion training with stochastic gradients, yielding score-approximation error bounds along the SGD trajectory. Finally, our analysis quantifies the role of the reweighting factor in the score approximation error, providing theoretical guidance for weighting choices used in practice.

Generative models trained on finite data face a fundamental tension: their score-matching or next-token objective converges to the empirical training distribution rather than the population distribution we seek to learn. Using rule-valid synthetic tasks, we trace this tension across two training timescales: $τ_{\mathrm{rule}}$, the step at which generations first become rule-valid, and $τ_{\mathrm{mem}}$, the step at which models begin reproducing training samples. Focusing on parity and extending to other binary rules and combinatorial puzzles, we characterize how these two clocks, $τ_{\mathrm{rule}}$ and $τ_{\mathrm{mem}}$, depend on key aspects of the learning setup. Specifically, we show that $τ_{\mathrm{rule}}$ increases with rule complexity and decreases with model capacity, while $τ_{\mathrm{mem}}$ is approximately invariant to the rule and scales nearly linearly with dataset size $N$. We define the \emph{innovation window} as the interval $[τ_{\mathrm{rule}}, τ_{\mathrm{mem}}]$. This window widens with increasing $N$ and narrows with rule complexity, and may vanish entirely when $τ_{\mathrm{rule}} \geq τ_{\mathrm{mem}}$. The same two-clock structure arises in both diffusion (DiT) and autoregressive (GPT) models, with architecture-dependent offsets. Dissecting the learned score of DiT models reveals a corresponding evolution of the optimization landscapes, where rule-valid samples' basins expand substantially around $τ_{\mathrm{rule}}$, while training samples' basins begin to dominate around $τ_{\mathrm{mem}}$. Together, these results yield a unified and predictive account of when and how generative models exhibit genuine innovation.