Effects of relational graph modularity and depth on the learning performance of neural networks

Yash Arya; Sang Hoon Lee

cs.LGJul 14, 2025

Effects of relational graph modularity and depth on the learning performance of neural networks

Authors: Yash Arya, Sang Hoon Lee

Abstract

In recent years, graph-based machine learning techniques, such as reinforcement learning and graph neural networks, have garnered significant attention. While some recent studies have started to explore the relationship between the graph structure of neural networks and their predictive performance, they often limit themselves to a narrow range of model networks, particularly lacking mesoscale structures such as communities. Our work advances this area by conducting a more comprehensive investigation, incorporating realistic network structures characterized by heterogeneous degree distributions and community structures, which are typical characteristics of many real networks. These community structures offer a nuanced perspective on network architecture. Our analysis employs model networks such as random and scale-free networks, alongside a comparison with a biological neural network and its subsets for more detailed analysis. We examine the impact of these structural attributes on the performance of image classification tasks. Our findings reveal that structural properties do affect performance to some extent. Specifically, within moderate-depth architectures, networks featuring coherent, densely interconnected communities demonstrate enhanced learning capabilities. Crucially, we find that this advantage is strictly depth-dependent: extending the architecture to eight layers reverses the effect entirely. This comparison with the biological neural network emphasizes the relevance of our findings to real-world structures, suggesting an intriguing connection worth further exploration. This study contributes meaningfully to network science and machine learning, providing insights that could inspire the design of more biologically informed neural networks.

Explore similar work

Jul 7, 2026cs.CV

Visual graphs for image classification: does the structure affect performance?

Deep learning models have emerged in machine learning and related fields, demonstrating astonishing performance in various visual tasks. Despite their great success, however, these models are unable to fully encode intrinsic visual structures, and often ignore the spatial, topological, and semantic information contained within an image. Graph neural networks offer a good framework to face this aspect, but their effective use for visual tasks has been only partly explored and mainly starting from a limited perspective. This work aims to address this gap by conducting a systematic comparison of current graph construction techniques within the context of a fixed three-layer GCN architecture. Through an empirical study, it demonstrates in particular how the network structure affects performance and provides an important methodological contribution regarding the computational stages preceding graph utilization, which will be strongly influenced by the structure itself.

Alessandra Ibba

Complex Networks Image Classification Visual Analytics

Ask PDF

May 18, 2026cs.LG

Deep Neural Sheaf Diffusion

Deep Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are essential for capturing complex dependencies in graph-structured data. However, scaling GNNs to depth remains challenging, as stacking layers leads to representation collapse and diminishing sensitivity due to repeated aggregation. While Neural Sheaf Diffusion (NSD) provides strong theoretical guarantees against such collapse, these guarantees do not translate to practice: as depth increases, the disagreement signal of the sheaf Laplacian vanishes, limiting the contribution of deeper layers. We identify mechanisms that hinder NSD effectiveness at depth and propose \emph{Deep Neural Sheaf Diffusion} (DNSD), which replaces the sheaf Laplacian with a sheaf adjacency operator to maintain informative signals across layers. This is complemented by normalization, odd nonlinearities, and gating. To provide a principled explanation of the expected performance improvement, we contrast sheaf diffusion to graph attention mechanisms, highlighting that DNSD replaces scalar attention scores with matrix-valued edge functions and normalizes node representations rather than attention scores. We demonstrate empirically that DNSD effectively utilizes deep aggregation in graph tasks, outperforming GNN and NSD baselines with up to 30pp accuracy on synthetic long-range datasets, and consistently outperforming them on real-world benchmarks. These results position sheaf-based architectures as a promising building block for graph foundation models by supporting effective deep architectures.

Rémi Bourgerie, Šarūnas Girdzijauskas, Viktoria Fodor

Graph Neural Networks Sheaf

Ask PDF

Jun 25, 2026cs.LG

Graph Neural Networks Applications Across Domains: All Insights You Need

Graph neural networks have moved from a niche representation-learning technique to the default model class wherever data carry relational structure. The interesting question is no longer whether message passing helps on a given dataset, but where graph structure earns its computational cost and where it does not. This survey organises the field around a single design space, derives the spectral and spatial formulations from shared first principles, and connects expressive power to the Weisfeiler-Leman hierarchy with explicit statements of what current architectures can and cannot separate. Against that methodological backbone we examine twelve application domains, among them recommendation and social networks, knowledge graphs and language-model integration, drug discovery and molecular property learning, healthcare and neuroscience, computer vision, traffic and urban computing, power and renewable-energy systems, wireless and sixth-generation networks, fraud and cybersecurity, industrial prognostics, materials science, and climate modelling. For each domain we specify the graph-construction choices and their costs, identify which architecture families dominate and why, and separate reported gains from artefacts of weak baselines or favourable splits. A cross-domain comparison exposes recurring patterns: heterophily and scale undercut the same models almost everywhere, temporal graphs remain harder than their static counterparts, and the architectures that top public leaderboards are seldom the ones that reach deployment. We treat over-smoothing, over-squashing, robustness, distribution shift, fairness, and explainability not as a closing checklist but as the constraints that decide adoption.

Abderaouf Bahi

Graph Neural Networks Neural Network Mobile Networks Computational Cost

Ask PDF