cs.LGNov 20, 2025

Warm-Starting Iterative Gaussian Processes for Faster Sequential Inference

Authors: Alan Yufei DongJihao Andreas LinJosé Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Organizations: Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge

Abstract

Efficient Gaussian process (GP) inference is critical for sequential decision-making tasks such as active learning, online prediction, and Bayesian optimization. Iterative approaches of approximating the GP posterior using solvers like conjugate gradients, stochastic gradient descent, or alternating projections avoid cubic costs, but often require many iterations to converge, limiting their efficacy when the posterior is updated frequently with new data. To address this, we introduce three warm-start strategies that exploit solutions of smaller linear systems to substantially speed-up convergence when updating the posterior with new data. Our methods are supported by theoretical analysis showing reduced initialization error in reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) distance, and by empirical results on regression benchmarks and Bayesian optimization tasks. Across solvers, warm-starting achieves speed-ups of up to 19x when solving to tolerance, and produces more accurate posterior estimates under fixed compute budgets, directly improving optimization performance. These results establish warm-starting as a simple, effective, and broadly applicable tool for scaling Gaussian processes in sequential settings.

Explore similar work

Apr 30, 2026eess.SP

Sequential Inference for Gaussian Processes: A Signal Processing Perspective

The proliferation of capable and efficient machine learning (ML) models marks one of the strongest methodological shifts in signal processing (SP) in its nearly 100-year history. ML models support the development of SP systems that represent complex, nonlinear relationships with high predictive accuracy. Adapting these models often requires sequential inference, which differs both theoretically and methodologically from the usual paradigm of ML, where data are often assumed independent and identically distributed. Gaussian processes (GPs) are a flexible yet principled framework for modeling random functions, and they have become increasingly relevant to SP as statistical and ML methods assume a more prominent role. We provide a self-contained, tutorial-style overview of GPs, with a particular focus on recent methodological advances in sequential, incremental, or streaming inference. We introduce these techniques from a signal-processing perspective while bridging them to recent advances in ML. Many of the developments we survey have direct applications to state-space modeling, sequential regression and forecasting, anomaly detection in time series, sequential Bayesian optimization, adaptive and active sensing, and sequential detection and decision-making. By organizing these advances from a signal-processing perspective, we intend to equip practitioners with practical tools and a coherent roadmap for deploying sequential GP models in real-world systems.
Daniel Waxman, Fernando Llorente, Petar M. Djurić
May 18, 2026cs.LG

Lightweight Gaussian Process Inference in C++ on Metal and CUDA

Gaussian process (GP) inference in Python is dominated by libraries such as GPyTorch and GPflow, which are built on deep-learning frameworks and inherit their dispatch overhead and dependency footprint. We present LightGP, a dependency-free C++17 library for GP regression with Python bindings, supporting Apple Metal and NVIDIA CUDA backends alongside tuned CPU paths via Apple Accelerate and OpenBLAS. LightGP provides four inference paths -- exact Cholesky, matrix-free conjugate gradients, sparse variational free energy, and structured kernel interpolation with FFT -- covering problems from N=100N{=}100 to N=500,000N{=}500{,}000. On an Apple M4, LightGP CPU is 2.6--8.7×\times faster than GPyTorch CPU for exact GP and 1.5×{\sim}1.5\times faster for sparse GP at every scale tested. On an NVIDIA RTX~3060, LightGP CUDA is 2.3--6.7×\times faster than GPyTorch CUDA for exact GP up to N=2,048N{=}2{,}048, with GPyTorch closing the gap at N=4,096N{=}4{,}096. A fused matrix-free kernel-vector product on Metal achieves 32×\times over the explicit path at N=20,000N{=}20{,}000 with O(N)O(N) memory, and an FFT-accelerated SKI matvec via Accelerate vDSP runs in sub-millisecond time at N=200,000N{=}200{,}000. LightGP compiles as a single static library with zero external dependencies and is installable via \texttt{pip install lightgp
Yu-Hsueh Fang
Sep 17, 2026cs.LG

Online Adaptive Kernel Mixing for Gaussian Process Decision Making

Gaussian Processes (GPs) are widely used as surrogates for black-box functions in sequential decision-making problems such as Bayesian optimization (BO), level set estimation (LSE), and Bayesian active learning (BAL). GP performance critically depends on kernels, and standard kernels can lead to suboptimal decisions under misspecification. To address this, we introduce HACK GPs (Hedge Adaptive Cumulative Kernels), a method that views kernel selection as an online learning with expert advice problem. HACK treats each candidate kernel as a GP "expert" and updates a distribution over experts online using AdaHedge, based on a loss received as a proxy for their ability to fit the function and align with the task objective. We provide two variants of HACK: (i) Mixture of Gaussians (MoG) and (ii) categorical sampling. We establish general guarantees showing that, under a loss-gap condition, the weight concentrates on the best kernel and the resulting acquisition function is close to that of the best expert. Empirically, we observe robust performance across BO, LSE, and BAL compared to standard kernels such as Squared Exponential and Matern-5/2, as well as simple ensemble baselines.
Kavin Aravindan, Mani Tej Sriram, Gautam Dasarathy +1