Survival Dynamics of Neural and Programmatic Policies in Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning

While deep Reinforcement Learning (deep-RL) has been increasingly applied to parameter control in evolutionary algorithms, rigorous theoretical analysis of parameter control remains largely restricted to single-parameter settings, owing to the difficulty of deriving effective, interpretable multi-parameter policies amenable to formal study. We demonstrate how deep-RL can be leveraged to overcome this barrier, using the (1+($λ$,$λ$))-genetic algorithm optimizing OneMax, one of the few problems where a super-constant speedup of dynamic control has been formally proven, as a representative case study. We first show that standard approaches struggle to converge in this multi-parameter setting, and introduce algorithm-agnostic enhancements targeting action-space decomposition, reward shifting, and long-horizon discounting. With these in place, we compare common deep-RL methods and find that Double Deep Q-Networks uniquely avoid the policy collapse observed in Proximal Policy Optimization, yielding trajectories suitable for downstream analysis. Crucially, we move beyond the ``black-box'' nature of neural networks by distilling the learned behaviors into a transparent, symbolic control policy. This resulting policy does not only offer interpretability for future theoretical analysis but also yields exceptional performance, consistently outperforming existing baselines across a wide range of problem sizes.

Programmatic reinforcement learning (PRL) offers an interpretable alternative to deep reinforcement learning by representing policies as human-readable and -editable programs. While gradient-based methods have been developed to optimize continuous relaxations of programs, they face a significant performance drop when converting the continuous relaxations back into discrete programs. Post-hoc discretization can discard optimized branches and parameters in a program, which results in a collapse of policy expressivity and lowered task performance, leading in turn to a need for additional fine-tuning. To overcome these limitations, we propose Differentiable Discrete Programmatic Reinforcement Learning (DiPRL), a method that learns programmatic policies that become nearly discrete during training, avoiding a separate post-hoc fine-tuning stage. We first analyze the inherent risks of performance drop introduced by post-hoc discretization of gradient-based methods. Then, we introduce programmatic architecture entropy regularization, which enables smooth, differentiable training that encourages convergence toward a discrete program. DiPRL maintains the efficiency of gradient-based optimization while mitigating the risks of post-hoc discretization. Our experiments across multiple discrete and continuous RL tasks demonstrate that DiPRL can achieve strong performance via interpretable programmatic policies.

Competitive artificial-life systems can rank trained controllers differently under training and ecological evaluation. We present Neuroevolution Arena, a GPU-accelerated spatial ecology of independently parameterized neural-network cells, and an audit-tracked nested evaluation protocol. Three implementation-specific update-and-inheritance regimes (EvoEvo, EvoRL, and RLRL) are crossed with two neural architectures for 50,000 generations in three independent training runs per condition. One saved elite-controller artifact from each of the 18 runs enters an aligned-run frozen-evaluation design comprising 198 computational jobs. Pairwise effects average three seed-defined ecological contexts (two cooperation-permitting and one attack-permitting) within each aligned training-run block; the independent level remains n = 3 runs per condition. RL-enabled regimes attain higher recorded training fitness than EvoEvo, whereas pairwise outcomes show architecture-conditioned majority patterns and substantial artifact dependence. Six-way winners vary across artifacts and contexts, and the prespecified survival endpoint has a complete floor. We contribute a nested protocol that separates training-run artifacts from evaluation contexts and exposes, rather than conceals, their different sources of variation.