FlexAct: Why Learn when you can Pick?

The choice of activation function plays a critical role in neural networks, yet most architectures still rely on fixed, uniform activation functions across all neurons. We introduce SmartMixed, a novel two-phase training strategy that allows networks to learn optimal per-neuron activation functions while preserving computational efficiency at inference. In the first phase, neurons adaptively select from a pool of candidate activation functions (ReLU, Sigmoid, Tanh, Leaky_ReLU, ELU, SELU) using a differentiable hard mixture mechanism. In the second phase, each neuron's activation function is fixed according to the learned selection, resulting in a computationally efficient network that supports continued training with optimized vectorized operations. We evaluate SmartMixed on the MNIST dataset using feedforward neural networks of different architectures. Our analysis reveals that neurons in different layers exhibit distinct preferences for activation functions, providing insights into the functional diversity within neural architectures. We also demonstrated that SmartMixed effectively trains the network by allowing neurons to select their preferred activation functions, competing against models using a single fixed state-of-the-art activation function.

This paper explores the expressive power of deep neural networks for a diverse range of activation functions. An activation function set $\mathscr{A}$ is defined to encompass the majority of commonly used activation functions, such as $\mathtt{ReLU}$, $\mathtt{LeakyReLU}$, $\mathtt{ReLU}^2$, $\mathtt{ELU}$, $\mathtt{CELU}$, $\mathtt{SELU}$, $\mathtt{Softplus}$, $\mathtt{GELU}$, $\mathtt{SiLU}$, $\mathtt{Swish}$, $\mathtt{Mish}$, $\mathtt{Sigmoid}$, $\mathtt{Tanh}$, $\mathtt{Arctan}$, $\mathtt{Softsign}$, $\mathtt{dSiLU}$, and $\mathtt{SRS}$. We demonstrate that for any activation function $\varrho\in \mathscr{A}$, a $\mathtt{ReLU}$ network of width $N$ and depth $L$ can be approximated to arbitrary precision by a $\varrho$-activated network of width $3N$ and depth $2L$ on any bounded set. This finding enables the extension of most approximation results achieved with $\mathtt{ReLU}$ networks to a wide variety of other activation functions, albeit with slightly increased constants. Significantly, we establish that the (width,$\,$depth) scaling factors can be further reduced from $(3,2)$ to $(1,1)$ if $\varrho$ falls within a specific subset of $\mathscr{A}$. This subset includes activation functions such as $\mathtt{ELU}$, $\mathtt{CELU}$, $\mathtt{SELU}$, $\mathtt{Softplus}$, $\mathtt{GELU}$, $\mathtt{SiLU}$, $\mathtt{Swish}$, and $\mathtt{Mish}$.

The choice of activation function plays a crucial role in the optimization and performance of deep neural networks. While the Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) remains the dominant choice due to its simplicity and effectiveness, its lack of smoothness may hinder gradient-based optimization in deep architectures. In this work we propose a family of $C^{2N}$-smooth activation functions whose gate follows a log-logistic CDF, achieving ReLU-like performance with purely rational arithmetic. We introduce three variants: GEM (the base family), E-GEM (an $ε$-parameterized generalization enabling arbitrary $L^p$-approximation of ReLU), and SE-GEM (a piecewise variant eliminating dead neurons with $C^{2N}$ junction smoothness). An $N$-ablation study establishes $N=1$ as optimal for standard-depth networks, reducing the GELU deficit on CIFAR-100 + ResNet-56 from 6.10% to 2.12%. The smoothness parameter $N$ further reveals a CNN-transformer tradeoff: $N=1$ is preferred for deep CNNs, while $N=2$ is preferred for transformers. On MNIST, E-GEM ties the best baseline (99.23%). On CIFAR-10 + ResNet-56, SE-GEM ($ε=10^{-4}$) surpasses GELU (92.51% vs 92.44%) -- the first GEM-family activation to outperform GELU. On CIFAR-100 + ResNet-56, E-GEM reduces the GELU deficit from 6.10% (GEM $N=2$) to just 0.62%. On GPT-2 (124M), GEM achieves the lowest perplexity (72.57 vs 73.76 for GELU), with GEM $N=1$ also beating GELU (73.32). On BERT-small, E-GEM ($ε=10$) achieves the best validation loss (6.656) across all activations. The $ε$-parameterization reveals a scale-dependent optimum: small $ε$ ($10^{-4}$--$10^{-6}$) for deep CNNs and larger transformers, with the special case of small transformers (BERT-small) benefiting from large $ε$ ($ε=10$) due to its limited depth and unconstrained gradients.