Tracing 3D Anatomy in 2D Strokes: A Multi-Stage Projection Driven Approach to Cervical Spine Fracture Identification
Authors: Fabi Nahian Madhurja, Rusab Sarmun, Muhammad E. H. Chowdhury, Adam Mushtak, Israa Al-Hashimi, Sohaib Bassam Zoghoul
Organizations: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh · Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh · Department of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar · Department of Radiology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Cervical spine fractures require rapid and accurate diagnosis, yet automatic CT interpretation remains challenging as subtle injuries must be assessed across large 3D volumes. We ask whether full 3D vertebra segmentation is necessary for automated fracture recognition, or whether vertebra masks approximated from 2D projections can preserve sufficient diagnostic context. We propose an end-to-end pipeline that localizes the cervical spine, estimates C1-C7 vertebra masks from optimized 2D projections, and uses the resulting vertebra-level volumes for downstream fracture classification. A YOLOv8 detector first localizes spine regions of interest from multi-view variance projections, achieving a 3D mean Intersection over Union of 94.45%. Multi-label vertebra segmentation is then performed with a DenseNet121-Unet on energy-based sagittal and coronal projections, attaining a mean Dice score of 87.86%. The predicted 2D masks are back-projected and fused into approximate 3D masks for each vertebra to extract volumes of interest from the original CT. These volumes are analyzed by an ensemble of 2.5D spatio-sequential CNN-Transformer models, yielding vertebra-level and patient-level F1 scores of 68.15 and 82.26, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 91.62 and 90.95, and area under the precision-recall curve of 75.60 and 92.00, respectively. The projection-derived volumes achieved fracture-recognition performance comparable to a full 3D-segmentation baseline, while shifting the vertebra segmentation stage into a lower-dimensional domain. Saliency-based explainability and interobserver variability analysis further examine interpretability and reliability. Overall, the results indicate that projection-based mask approximation is a viable proxy for full 3D vertebra segmentation in cervical fracture recognition.
Rib fractures are common and time-consuming to localize on computed tomography (CT). We ask whether fractures detected independently in two orthogonal CT-derived projections (anteroposterior and lateral) can be paired across views and triangulated into reliable 3D points at a controlled rate of false outputs, and we answer it with a staged diagnostic study. The projection geometry is exact, and given correct correspondence, localization is accurate (median 4.0 mm, 88% within 10 mm, 93.6% rib-exact). On a sealed 55-case cohort, a large share of fractures is in principle recoverable (61.1% dual-view availability, and a correct pair present in the candidate graph for 58.4% of fractures), yet the binding limitation is neither geometry nor localization but confidence-limited cross-view correspondence. A controlled detector-by-correspondence factorial attributes the operational gain to lateral-detector quality rather than the tested matching methods; retraining the lateral detector produces the first nonzero controlled-budget reconstructions. Under a deliberately conservative commitment policy, a pre-specified sealed pass promotes 15 of 601 fractures to correct 3D localizations at 0.436 false points per case (2.50% end-to-end commitment yield), and committed points are accurate (median 1.49 mm, 93% rib-exact). The low yield is a consequence of confidence-gated abstention, not of geometry or detection: the study establishes a reproducible framework for selective 3D localization and identifies cross-view correspondence as the dominant operational bottleneck.
Automated segmentation of the vertebral column in Computed Tomography (CT) scans is a prerequisite for pathological assessment and surgical planning. However, state-of-the-art methods, particularly those based on Transformers or large-scale ensembles, demand substantial GPU resources, creating a barrier for clinical adoption in resource-constrained environments or on edge devices. To address this, we introduce SpineContextResUNet, a computationally efficient 3D Residual U-Net designed for rapid spinal localization. Our architecture integrates a lightweight Context Block that employs parallel multi-dilated convolutions to capture long-range anatomical dependencies without the high latency of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) or the memory overhead of Self-Attention mechanisms. Extensive validation on two public benchmarks, VerSe2020 and CTSpine1K, demonstrates that our model achieves a Dice score of 88.17% and 88.13% respectively. To evaluate performance under strict hardware constraints, we compared our model against a bottlenecked SwinUNETR scaled to match our ~1.7M hardware footprint. While the constrained Transformer suffers severe performance degradation due to a lack of spatial inductive biases in a limited-data regime, our CNN-based approach successfully maintains high accuracy. Crucially, heavy baselines like TotalSegmentator fail due to memory exhaustion on commodity hardware (Intel Core i5, 8GB RAM), our model performs robust inference, making it a viable solution for point-of-care diagnostics and deployment on edge platforms like the Nvidia Jetson Orin Nano.
Automated segmentation of cervical-spine MRI is increasingly used in clinical workflows, yet no fairness audit exists for this anatomy. We show that auditing these segmentation tasks is complicated by a common property of modern segmentation datasets: expert-annotated gold labels are expensive, so abundant machine-generated (silver) labels are added to limit annotation cost. This matters because the reference used to judge a model can itself be biased. In this study, we present the first fairness audit of cervical-spine MRI segmentation across sex, age, and race using the CSpineSeg dataset. We observe that the deployed model is demographically fair, but the choice of reference label, however, is not neutral. Because a dataset's silver labels are generated by a model trained on its gold labels, any new model trained on those same gold labels agrees more with the silver labels than with expert truth: scoring identical predictions against silver rather than gold overestimates performance by ~8 Dice points and turns the fairness verdict for age from non-significant to significant - not by the gap inflation Parikh et al. report (which we term false magnitude) but by collapsing within-group variance (which we term false confidence). Reference-label provenance is thus a first-order confounder in segmentation evaluation: performance and fairness should be reported against expert labels, and any fairness claim stated together with the provenance of its reference.