DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Rapid and accurate post-disaster building damage assessment is essential, yet remains a challenging task. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery offers a timely and high-resolution view of affected areas, but existing Computer Vision (CV) models often demand large annotated datasets, generalize poorly across geographic regions and their assessment policies, and are confined to the specific tasks they were trained for. Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) offer a promising alternative through their strong reasoning and generalization capabilities, but fall short on precise, low-level perception tasks such as object detection and accurate bounding box generation. Furthermore, they often require a substantial amount of data for effective fine-tuning on domain-specific tasks. In this paper, we propose a hybrid framework that decouples detection from damage assessment, combining the precision of CV models with the reasoning power of LVLMs. A CV model first detects buildings and generates bounding boxes on the image that are then passed to an LVLM for damage classification and contextual interpretation. We evaluated our framework on two real-world benchmarks: RescueNet and FloodNet. In particular, the best combination under this framework accurately counts intact, partially damaged and completely destroyed buildings, surpassing isolated baselines by up to 2.1 R^2 points, while requiring only limited annotated data for the detection stage. Beyond reporting aggregate gains, we provide a detailed analysis of failure scenarios and edge cases, offering practical insights for practitioners and concrete directions for future work. Our source code and data are publicly available to the research community via the following repository: https://github.com/ungquanghuy-kddi/VLM_GDINO.git

Remote-sensing vision-language models (RS-VLMs) have advanced Earth-observation analysis toward visual interpretation and instruction-following, yet fall short of operational geo-intelligence, which demands tool-grounded spatial reasoning and structured, evidence-backed decisions. We introduce GeoDisaster, an operational geospatial disaster reasoning benchmark with 2,921 verified instances across 43 question types and five task families: deforestation monitoring, multi-hazard analysis, building-damage assessment, flood-safe routing, and Sentinel-1 SAR flood monitoring. Instances integrate heterogeneous EO/GIS evidence-optical and SAR imagery, raster masks, vector geometries, road networks, and exposure layers-spanning hazard detection, damage assessment, exposure estimation, and diagnostic report generation. Ground-truth answers are grounded in executable geospatial workflows and deterministic consistency checks, removing the need for language-model annotation. We further propose an orchestrated multi-agent framework with 18 disaster-oriented tools, where role-specialized agents coordinate through explicit execution contracts, aligned via Role-Contract Expectation Alignment (RCEA): failure-aware supervised fine-tuning combined with contract-grounded reinforcement learning over dense step-level signals. Experiments show that GeoDisaster challenges existing RS-VLMs and agentic systems, while RCEA improves tool use, evidence grounding, state consistency, and decision generation.

Decision-relevant building damage assessment is critical for prioritizing resources and recovery after a disaster, yet most automated methods either flatten damage into a single severity scale (no damage, minor, major, destroyed) or require paired pre- and post-event imagery that is often unavailable for emerging hazards. This paper presents Damage-TriageFormer, a single-image, post-event, footprint-conditioned model that produces a damage typology rather than a severity scale. We contribute: (1) DamageTriage-Bench, a new benchmark built from NOAA Emergency Response Imagery across Hurricane Michael (2018), Hurricane Helene (2024), and the 2025 Los Angeles wildfire complex, with five typology classes that distinguish roof damage from structural damage and, within each, partial from total extent; and (2) Damage-TriageFormer, which extends a DINOv3 ViT-L backbone with a Simple Feature Pyramid for higher-resolution instance pooling, a two-stage gated damage head, and an auxiliary severity-regression objective. Our model achieves macro F1 of 0.624 on validation and 0.619 on a held-out stratified test set, performing strongest where operational triage needs it most, with per-class F1 of 0.91 and 0.84 on undamaged buildings and total structural collapse, respectively. While the rare Total Roof Damage class remains difficult due to its limited examples and an inherently ambiguous label boundary, our results show that single-image post-event imagery can support actionable building damage typing, enabling targeted emergency response and resource allocation without a pre-event reference.