Defining Operational Conditions for Safety-Critical AI-Based Systems from Data

Over the last few years, research on autonomous systems has matured to such a degree that the field is increasingly well-positioned to translate research into practical, stakeholder-driven use cases across well-defined domains. However, for a wide-scale practical adoption of autonomous systems, adherence to safety regulations is crucial. Many regulations are influenced by the Operational Design Domain (ODD), which defines the specific conditions in which an autonomous agent can function. This is especially relevant for Automated Driving Systems (ADS), as a dependable perception of ODD elements is essential for safe implementation and auditing. Vision-language models (VLMs) integrate visual recognition and language reasoning, functioning without task-specific training data, which makes them suitable for adaptable ODD perception. To assess whether VLMs can function as zero-shot "ODD sensors" that adapt to evolving definitions, we contribute (i) an empirical study of zero-shot ODD classification and detection using four VLMs on a custom dataset and Mapillary Vistas, along with failure analyses; (ii) an ablation of zero-shot optimization strategies with a cost-performance overview; and (iii) a suite of reusable prompting templates with guidance for adaptation. Our findings indicate that definition-anchored chain-of-thought prompting with persona decomposition performs best, while other methods may result in reduced recall. Overall, our results pave the way for transparent and effective ODD-based perception in safety-critical applications.

The design of embedded safety-critical systems such as those used in next-generation automotive and autonomous platforms, is increasingly challenged by escalating system complexity, hardware-software heterogeneity, and the integration of intelligent, data-driven components. Ensuring dependability in such systems requires a holistic approach that spans multiple abstraction layers and encompasses both design- and run-time assurance. Traditional methods for reliability, safety, and security management often fall short in addressing the dynamic and uncertain behaviors introduced by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) components, especially under stringent real-time, power, and safety constraints. While AI and ML offer powerful predictive, adaptive, and self-optimizing capabilities that can enhance system dependability, their inherent non-determinism, data-dependence, and lack of formal guarantees introduce new challenges for verification, validation, and certification. This paper explores emerging methodologies, architectures, and frameworks for designing dependable autonomous and embedded systems in the era of AI. It highlight advances in reliability modeling, secure system design, and certification approaches that account for imperfect, learning-enabled components, aiming to bridge the gap between AI innovation and certifiable system-level dependability.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is currently only applied to non-safety critical applications due to the strict standards and regulations for railway industries. We propose to review the three main fields necessary to increase trust in data science and AI algorithms and reach compliance: robustness, Operational Design Domain (ODD), and explainability. Robustness is the ability of an AI system to maintain its level of performance under any circumstances (ISO24029). ODDs allow the explicit definition of operating conditions under which a system is intended to operate, according to the recently published DIN DKE SPEC 99004. Explainability is the property of an AI system to express important factors influencing the AI system results in a way that humans can understand. Those 3 domains of research are already well investigated by nonrailway actors, with algorithms and methods ready to use for railway applications. A system view is necessary to ensure all trustworthy requirements interact continuously in a safe MLOps environment thereby fostering acceptance from regulators, operators and the public. Beyond safeguarding safety-critical applications, we aim to show that fostering deep trust in AI, as now required by regulatory frameworks worldwide, will unlock its full potential and transform the pace of adoption across mission-critical domains.