math.OCDate pending

Block-Norm Geometries for Online Mirror Descent with Sparse Losses

Authors: Swati GuptaJai MoondraMohit Singh

Abstract

The performance of online mirror descent depends critically on the geometry induced by its mirror map, yet standard algorithms largely rely on two canonical choices: Euclidean and entropic geometry. We show that these two geometries can both be substantially suboptimal when loss gradients are sparse. We introduce a family of randomized block-norm mirror maps that interpolates between Euclidean and entropic geometries and adapts to intermediate sparsity structure. For several standard convex sets, including p\ell_p balls, ellipsoids, boxes, and Minkowski sums of norm balls, we prove polynomial-in-dimension improvements in regret bounds over the better of online projected gradient descent and exponentiated gradient. We further construct explicit online convex optimization instances for which these improvements are realized: on a simple polytope, an intermediate block geometry achieves a poly(d)\text{poly}(d) separation in regret from both Euclidean and entropic geometries in dimension dd, while on the probability simplex we obtain a separation of order Ω(logd/loglogd)\Omega(\sqrt{\log d}/\log\log d). Finally, we study geometry selection when sparsity is unknown. We show that naively alternating between mirror maps can incur linear regret, even though either mirror map alone has sublinear regret, and give a Hedge meta-algorithm that competes with the best mirror map in a finite portfolio. For random block geometries, this yields regret within an O(loglogd)O(\sqrt{\log\log d}) factor of the best random uniform block norm chosen in hindsight.

Explore similar work

Sep 8, 2026cs.LG

Exact-Form Regret for Gradient Descent, Mirror Descent and Follow-the-Regularized-Leader

Online gradient descent is usually studied through external regret, where the learner competes with fixed alternatives. Recent work shows that first-order methods control richer action-dependent deviations. We ask for a geometric characterization of the deviations with respect to which online gradient descent, mirror descent, and follow-the-regularized-leader (FTRL) achieve no regret. We identify exactness as the common principle. Exactness means that the relevant displacement field is generated by a scalar potential, or equivalently that the associated one-form is exact in the geometry used by the algorithm. This geometry depends on the algorithm. For gradient descent it is Euclidean geometry, for mirror descent it is the geometry induced by the regularizer, and for FTRL it is the cumulative dual state. Under mild regularity conditions, exactness yields sublinear regret, while nonzero circulation provides the complementary obstruction and leads to linear regret. This gives a unified geometric framework for understanding the deviation classes controlled by these algorithms and reveals that different first-order methods can control genuinely different classes of deviations. These deviation classes have direct consequences for learning, particularly in games. We study the equilibrium notions induced by exact-form deviations and introduce conservative correlated equilibrium, reflecting both the conservative geometry of the underlying displacement fields and the restricted family of deviations available to the players. We characterize its relation to correlated equilibrium, determine when the resulting equilibrium notions coincide and when they separate, and show how these relationships depend on the geometry and the learning algorithm. Overall, this work gives a unified geometric account of what first-order online learning algorithms are no-regret with respect to, beyond fixed comparators.
Ashkan Soleymani, Gabriele Farina, Patrick Jaillet
May 25, 2026cs.LG

Online Learning on Hidden-Convex Losses via Algorithmic Equivalence: Optimal Regret, Geometric Barrier, and Bandit Feedback

We study adversarial online learning with hidden-convex losses, i.e., nonconvex losses that become convex after a nonlinear reparameterization. Ghai, Lu and Hazan (2022) proved that, under geometric and smoothness assumptions, online gradient descent (OGD) on such nonconvex losses approximately simulates online mirror descent (OMD) on the underlying convex losses with a suitable regularizer, yielding O(T2/3)\mathcal{O}(T^{2/3}) regret. They left open whether the optimal Θ(T)Θ(\sqrt{T}) regret from online convex optimization can be recovered in this hidden-convex setting. We answer this question affirmatively. More specifically, via a sharper discrete-time algorithmic equivalence argument, we prove that OGD achieves O(T)\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T}) regret under the same assumptions, matching the optimal worst-case rate for adversarial online convex optimization. We also address another open question of Ghai, Lu and Hazan (2022) by clarifying the geometry required for this algorithmic equivalence. We replace the diagonal-Jacobian sufficient condition with a necessary-and-sufficient Hessian compatibility condition, thereby expanding the class of admissible reparameterizations. We complement our tight regret bound with a lower bound showing that the Hessian compatibility assumption is essential for OGD; when it fails, we construct a smooth reparameterization and an adversarial sequence of hidden-convex losses for which OGD suffers Ω(T)Ω(T) regret. Finally, we extend our analysis to one-point bandit feedback and prove a O(T3/4)\mathcal{O}(T^{3/4}) expected regret bound for bandit OGD with spherical smoothing, matching its classical rate on convex losses.
Anas Barakat, Andreas Kontogiannis, Vasilis Pollatos +2
Aug 3, 2026math.OC

Non-KKT Accumulation in Entropic Mirror Descent

For mirror descent generated by a Legendre kernel, perhaps one of the most basic question in optimization is this: must every accumulation point of a bounded mirror descent sequence be Karush--Kuhn--Tucker (KKT) stationary under proper stepsizes? We show that the answer is no. A longstanding obstacle to resolving this question is the boundary blow-up of the Legendre gradient: it keeps every mirror step in the interior, while at a boundary limit, the inverse entropy metric vanishes on active coordinates and can erase the dual-feasibility in the KKT system. We construct CC^\infty objectives and bounded sequences generated by the Shannon-entropic mirror descent on the nonnegative orthant R+n\R_+^n, for every n3n\geq 3, and on the probability simplex ΔnΔ_n, for every n4n\geq 4, such that, in each case, the set of accumulation points is a smooth boundary circle containing a nonempty relatively open arc of non-KKT points. The steps satisfy αkkβα_k\asymp k^{-β} with β(1/2,1)β\in(1/2,1), the objective values are nonincreasing, and the objectives are entropy-relatively smooth. Hence the pathology stems from the degeneracy of the Bregman geometry at the boundary, rather than from failure of descent, or improper stepsizes. To the best of our knowledge, these provide the first counterexamples to KKT accumulation for bounded mirror descent sequences with nonincreasing objective values.
Kuangyu Ding, Kim-Chuan Toh