Organizations: School of Artificial Intelligence, Sogang University · AI Lab of CTO division, LG Electronics · School of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University · School of Electronic Engineering, Pusan University · Memory Business Division, Samsung Electronics
Referring Image Segmentation (RIS) aims to segment a target object described by a natural language expression. Existing methods have evolved by leveraging the vision information into the language tokens. To more effectively exploit visual contexts for fine-grained segmentation, we propose a novel Visual Informative Part Attention (VIPA) framework for referring image segmentation. VIPA leverages the informative parts of visual contexts, called a visual expression, which can effectively provide the structural and semantic visual target information to the network. This design reduces high-variance cross-modal projection and enhances semantic consistency in an attention mechanism of the referring image segmentation. We also design a visual expression generator (VEG) module, which retrieves informative visual tokens via local-global linguistic context cues and refines the retrieved tokens for reducing noise information and sharing informative visual attributes. This module allows the visual expression to consider comprehensive contexts and capture semantic visual contexts of informative regions. In this way, our framework enables the network's attention to robustly align with the fine-grained regions of interest. Extensive experiments and visual analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Our VIPA outperforms the existing state-of-the-art methods on four public RIS benchmarks.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : (a) Example of a transformer decoder used to extract language outputs. (b) Illustration of different RIS frameworks. Different from previous works, our approach leverages visual expression , generated from the retrieved informative parts of visual contexts, as a key-value set in the Transformer-based segmentation decoder. (c) Visual comparison of two different key-value sets. Yellow dotted boxes are incorrect predictions. The visual expression (VE) robustly guides the network’s attention to the regions of interest by enhancing semantic coherence in the attention mechanism of referring image segmentation, whereas the advanced language expression (LE) results in incomplete predictions.
Fig. 2 : Overview of Visual Informative Part Attention (VIPA) framework. VIPA robustly guides the network’s attention to the region of interest by exploiting the visual expression generated from the retrieved informative parts of visual contexts.
Method
Publication
Vision
Language
RefCOCO
RefCOCO+
RefCOCOg
ReferIt
Model
Model
val
test A
test B
val
test A
test B
val
test
test
LLM-based RIS methods + additional vision-language training datasets
LISA-7B [ 6 ]
CVPR 2024
SAM-H
Vicuna-7B
74.9
79.1
72.3
65.1
70.8
58.1
67.9
70.6
-
PixelLM [ 15 ]
CVPR 2024
CLIP-VIT-L
Vicuna-7B
73.0
76.5
68.2
66.3
71.7
58.3
69.3
70.5
-
GSVA-7B [ 16 ]
CVPR 2024
SAM-H
Vicuna-7B
77.2
78.9
73.5
65.9
69.6
59.8
72.7
73.3
-
GLaMM [ 17 ]
CVPR 2024
SAM-H
Vicuna-7B
79.5
83.2
76.9
72.6
78.7
64.6
74.2
74.9
-
TABLE I : Performance comparison with the state-of-the-art methods on four public referring image segmentation datasets. LLM-based models are marked in gray . † indicates models trained on multiple RefCOCO series datasets with removed validation and testing images to prevent data leakage. For ReferIt dataset, only ReferIt training set is used.
Fig. 3 : Qualitative comparison with the LLM-based RIS model [ 6 ] on RefCOCO+.
Method
Publication
RefCOCO
RefCOCO+
RefCOCOg
val
test A
test B
val
test A
test B
val
test
C3VG [ 64 ]
AAAI’25
81.37
82.93
79.12
77.05
79.61
72.40
76.34
77.10
DeRIS-B [ 65 ]
ICCV’25
81.99
82.97
80.14
75.62
79.16
71.63
76.30
77.15
VIPA (Ours)
-
82.41
83.64
80.57
77.36
80.19
72.48
76.72
77.45
TABLE II : Comparison of more recent transformer-based methods using BEiT3 [ 63 ] as encoder.
Method
GFLOPs
oIoU (%)
Inference Time (ms)
GLaMM-7B ‡ [ 17 ]
-
74.2
786 (BF16)
LISA-7B ‡ [ 6 ]
13,026
67.9
368 (BF16)
VIPA † (Ours)
431
70.01
82 (FP32)
DMMI [ 5 ]
392
63.46
74 (FP32)
CGFormer [ 29 ]
950
64.68
105 (FP32)
VIPA (Ours)
431
65.93
82 (FP32)
TABLE III : Computational comparison with recent methods on RefCOCOg val . Inference times are measured in Brain Floating Point 16 (BF16) for LLM-based models and Floating Point 32 (FP32) for Transformer-based models. LLM-based models are marked in gray . ‡ indicates models trained with additional vision-language datasets. † indicates models trained on multiple RefCOCO series datasets.
Method
RefCOCOg val
RefCOCOg test
seen
unseen
seen
unseen
CRIS [ 4 ]
58.64
42.63
59.68
38.88
LAVT [ 36 ]
60.16
42.33
60.37
41.38
CGFormer [ 29 ]
65.60
46.11
65.67
42.31
VIPA (Ours)
66.52
46.74
66.93
43.06
TABLE IV : Comparison for generalization setting using mIoU.
TABLE V : Ablation for the effectiveness of the visual informative part attention framework. LE: Linguistic Expression tokens. VE: Visual Expression tokens (Ours). are ablation methods that leverage language-based tokens as key-value components in the segmentation decoder. Advanced LE indicates a method using visual-aware language tokens extracted by cross-attention with the vision features. is our method that leverages the visual expression, generated from the retrieved informative parts of visual contexts.
Design
RefCOCO+ val
RefCOCOg val
(a)
Step 1
Step 2
mIoU
oIoU
mIoU
oIoU
✗
✓
66.67
64.72
66.31
64.04
✓
✗
66.29
64.54
65.82
63.79
✓
✓
70.42
66.91
69.98
65.93
(b)
Global
Local
mIoU
oIoU
mIoU
oIoU
TABLE VI : Ablation studies for the design of the visual expression generator module. Our default design is marked in .
Encoder Feature Extraction
Method
RefCOCO+
val
test A
test B
w/o Fusion
w/o VE
62.74
68.41
55.82
w/ VE
65.15
71.17
58.34
Late Fusion
w/o VE
63.88
69.65
57.07
w/ VE
66.74
72.21
59.73
TABLE VII : Ablation for different encoder fusion types.
Fig. 4 : Ablation study on the number of the retrieved informative visual tokens.
Method
RefCOCO+ val
RefCOCO+ test A
RefCOCO+ test B
w/o Supervision
65.93
71.50
59.26
Direct thresholding loss
66.52
71.93
59.60
Pixel contrastive loss
66.91
72.44
60.15
TABLE VIII : Additional ablation on supervision by the contrastive loss. Our default design is marked in .
Method
RefCOCO val
RefCOCO+ val
RefCOCOg val
mIoU
oIoU
mIoU
oIoU
mIoU
oIoU
w/o articles
77.80
75.11
69.35
66.32
67.74
64.99
All words
78.68
75.84
70.42
66.91
69.98
65.93
TABLE IX : Ablation study on the use of the article tokens at the process of retrieving informative visual contexts. Our default design is marked in .
Fig. 5 : t-SNE visualizations and qualitative comparisons between the ablation method ( i.e ., advanced language expression) and our method ( i.e ., visual expression).
Fig. 6 : (a-b) Visualized comparison with the ablation method ( i.e ., advanced Language Expression (LE)) and our method ( i.e ., Visual Expression (VE)). (c) Visual analysis of the attention map between vision query features and visual expression key-value set, and the attention map between vision query features and advanced language expression key-value set.
Fig. 7 : (a) Qualitative comparison with Transformer-based RIS methods. (b) Our results on long and difficult language inputs.
Fig. 8 : Additional visualization comparison of our method and the ablated method on various target object categories, where the ablation model misses the target regions.
Fig. 9 : Additional visualization comparison of our method and the ablated method on various target object categories, where the ablation model segments even non-target regions.
Fig. 10 : Additional visualization comparison of our method and the ablated method on the target object of the person, where the ablation model fails to capture the target regions.
Referring image segmentation aims to produce a pixel-level mask for the image region described by a natural-language expression. Although pretrained vision-language models have improved semantic grounding, many existing methods still rely on uniform refinement strategies that do not fully match the diverse reasoning requirements of referring expressions. Because of this mismatch, predictions often contain fragmented regions, inaccurate boundaries, or even the wrong object, especially when pretrained backbones are frozen for computational efficiency. To address these limitations, we propose SERA, a Spatio-Semantic Expert Routing Architecture for referring image segmentation. SERA introduces lightweight, expression-aware expert refinement at two complementary stages within a vision-language framework. First, we design SERA-Adapter, which inserts an expression-conditioned adapter into selected backbone blocks to improve spatial coherence and boundary precision through expert-guided refinement and cross-modal attention. We then introduce SERA-Fusion, which strengthens intermediate visual representations by reshaping token features into spatial grids and applying geometry-preserving expert transformations before multimodal interaction. In addition, a lightweight routing mechanism adaptively weights expert contributions while remaining compatible with pretrained representations. To make this routing stable under frozen encoders, SERA uses a parameter-efficient tuning strategy that updates only normalization and bias terms, affecting less than 1% of the backbone parameters. Experiments on standard referring image segmentation benchmarks show that SERA consistently outperforms strong baselines, with especially clear gains on expressions that require accurate spatial localization and precise boundary delineation.
Alaa Dalaq, Muzammil Behzad
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Mineral, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia · SDAIA-KFUPM Joint Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia
Referring image segmentation aims to localize and segment a target object in an image based on a free-form referring expression. The core challenge lies in effectively bridging linguistic descriptions with object-level visual representations, especially when referring expressions involve detailed attributes and complex inter-object relationships. Existing methods either rely on cross-modal alignment or employ Semantic Segmentation Prompts, but they often lack explicit reasoning mechanisms for grounding language descriptions to target regions in the image. To address these limitations, we propose PPCR, a Progressive Prompt-guided Cross-modal Reasoning framework for referring image segmentation. PPCR explicitly structures the reasoning process as a Semantic Understanding-Spatial Grounding-Instance Segmentation pipeline. Specifically, PPCR first employs multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to generate Semantic Segmentation Prompt that capture key semantic cues of the target object. Based on this semantic context, Spatial Segmentation Prompt are further generated to reason about object location and spatial extent, enabling a progressive transition from semantic understanding to spatial grounding. The Semantic and Spatial Segmentation prompts are then jointly integrated into the segmentation module to guide accurate target localization and segmentation. Extensive experiments on standard referring image segmentation benchmarks demonstrate that PPCR consistently outperforms existing methods. The code will be publicly released to facilitate reproducibility.
Jiachen Li, Hongyun Wang, Jinyu Xu +5
School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China · School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China · University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China +1
Recent advances in vision foundation models (VFMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across diverse unimodal visual tasks. However, adapting VFMs to referring image segmentation (RIS) typically necessitates precise vision-language alignment via full fine-tuning, incurring substantial computational overhead and risking catastrophic forgetting. While existing parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods enable safe knowledge transfer with minimal training costs, they predominantly operate independently within individual modalities or focus exclusively on unidirectional guidance from language to vision, overlooking progressive cross-modal interaction and visual feedback for textual refinement. To address these limitations, we propose Bidirectional Reciprocal Learning (BRL), a novel adapter-based PEFT framework that facilitates hierarchical, bidirectional information flow within both token-mixing and channel-mixing layers of frozen foundation models. Specifically, BRL introduces two complementary lightweight modules. The Reciprocal Attention Adapter (RAA) performs cross-modal query-key exchanges at the token level, enabling visual and linguistic tokens to mutually attend to each other for fine-grained spatial grounding. The Reciprocal Gate Adapter (RGA) generates cross-modal gating signals at the channel level, allowing global semantic context from one modality to adaptively recalibrate channel activations of the other. Extensive experiments on RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, and RefCOCOg benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of BRL over prior RIS methods, achieving state-of-the-art performance while requiring less than 0.5% backbone parameter updates. Code and models will be released at https://github.com/xiaoqiang-lu/BRL.
Xiaoqiang Lu, Licheng Jiao, Lingling Li +5
Key Laboratory of Intelligent Perception and Image Understanding of Ministry of Education, International Research Center for Intelligent Perception and Computation, School of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, 710071, China