Morphing of and writing with a scissor linkage mechanism

Mohanraj A; S Ganga Prasath

Figure 1: Geometry of scissor linkage mechanism. (A) A single scissor-unit is made of two rigid members of length

l

connected by a pin joint. Each unit is described by two geometric variables: angle between members

\phi

; the aspect ratio

\alpha

defined as relative distance of the pin joint from the end to the total length,

l

. (B) Vectors

\hat{\mathbf{t}}^{(1)}

and

\hat{\mathbf{t}}^{(2)}

capture the orientation of the members

ac

,

bd

. Along the edges

ac

,

bd

we define two normal vectors

\hat{\mathbf{N}}_{e}

and

\hat{\mathbf{N}}_{w}

. The tangent vectors,

\hat{\mathbf{T}}_{e}

and

\hat{\mathbf{T}}_{w}

, are defined orthogonal to these normal vectors.

\Delta_{o}

is the width of the segment passing through the pin joint and intersecting faces

ad,bc

. (C) Contours of

\kappa_{o}(\alpha,\phi)

, the effective curvature of each scissor-unit defined in Eq. 2 .

\kappa_{o}

diverges for

\phi\to 0

and vanishes at the symmetric midpoint

\alpha=0.5

. (D) Comparison between theoretical prediction of the critical actuation angle

\Psi^{*}

(solid line) required to achieve self-intersection (

N\phi^{*}=2\pi

) and experimentally measured angles (green markers). Error bars are smaller than the size of the markers. (E) Scissor-units are assembled by connecting to neighboring units via pin joints resulting in a single degree-of-freedom for the mechanism. The location of center pin joint of

j

-th unit is denoted by

\mathbf{r}_{j}

and the radius of curvature by

\kappa_{j}^{-1}

. Actuation angle

\Psi

is the angle between the members of the first unit,

\Psi=\phi_{1}

and is used to control the motion of the assembly.

\phi^{*}

is defined as the angle between the lines connecting the sides

ad

and

bc

in Fig. 1 (B)). (F) Sequence of configurations of a scissor mechanism from experiments whose aspect ratios are given by

\{\alpha_{j}\}=0.45

for

0<j<6

and

\{\alpha_{j}\}=0.55

for

6\leq j<12

. Decreasing the actuation angle

\Psi

via Arduino controlled motor drive (see Sec. II for details) steers the mechanism from a near-straight configuration (left) to a curved shape (right), illustrating large-scale shape change enabled by the intrinsic geometry.

Figure 2: Shape morphing of scissor mechanism. (A) 3D printed scissor-units made with an adjustable slider allowing continuous variation in the aspect ratio

\alpha

along with a screw that can be locked into position. These units are connected to neighboring units via pin joints. (B) In the shape morphing task, the mechanism is designed to take a target shape by choosing appropriate aspect ratios

\{\alpha_{j}\}

and actuating the mechanism to angle

\Psi^{*}

. These values are arrived at by minimizing the shape error,

\mathcal{L}

between the current configuration,

\mathbf{r}_{j}

and the target shape described by a curvature

\kappa^{t}

(see SI Sec. S5 for details). (C) Examples showing the scissor mechanism deployed to target shapes (curves in blue) in experiments and simulation (see SI Video 2 for the deployment sequence). The target shapes have

(i)

a monotonically increasing curvature (left);

(ii)

a sinusoidal curvature profile (middle);

(iii)

a three-petaled flower (right). (D) Evolution of the mechanism shape in experiments upon actuation by decreasing

\Psi

. Inset shows the solution aspect ratios

\alpha_{j}

obtained via the optimization procedure detailed in Sec. III.3 .

Figure 3: Writing with a scissor mechanism. (A) Contour in the

(\alpha,\Psi)

plane showing the curvature of the distal end of the mechanism

\kappa_{\textrm{tip}}(\alpha,\Psi;N)

made of

N

scissor-units with constant

\alpha

. Three different contours corresponding to

N=5

(orange),

N=10

(green), and

N=20

(blue) are shown and iso-contour labels correspond to magnitude of

\kappa_{\textrm{tip}}

. Insets illustrate tip trajectories

\mathbf{r}_{\textrm{tip}}(\Psi)

(for

N=5

) obtained by sweeping

\Psi

from

\pi

to

0

at the corresponding parameter locations. As

\alpha

departs from

0.5

the trajectory rapidly develops tight loops (large

\kappa_{\textrm{tip}}

), whereas

\alpha\to 0.5

yields an almost straight path with

\kappa_{\textrm{tip}}\approx 0

. We see that the mechanism is capable of tracing trajectories with rapidly changing tip curvature, however, they vary only monotonically. (B) Representative tip trajectories generated using the forward kinematics formulation for segmented mechanisms in Eq. 5 . Trajectories are for

J=3

sections with distinct aspect ratios (

\alpha_{j}=\{0.41,0.17,0.55\}

for solid line,

\alpha_{j}=\{0.44,0.43,0.23\}

for short dashed line,

\alpha_{j}=\{0.71,0.32,0.51\}

for long dashed line,

\alpha_{j}=\{0.41,0.62,0.89\}

for dot-dashed line). The mechanism is capable of tracing complex paths with varying curvature, including spirals and self-intersecting loops. (C) The mechanism is parameterized by constant aspect ratios

\{\alpha_{j}\}

(function in green), which determine the tip trajectory

\mathbf{r}_{\textrm{tip}}(\Psi)

(shown in red) through the forward kinematic relations in Eq. 5 . The resulting trajectory is compared against a prescribed target curve (blue) in the tip-trajectory error

\mathcal{L}_{\textrm{tip}}

(see Eq. 6 ), which quantifies the curvature mismatch between

\kappa_{\textrm{tip}}(s;\{\alpha_{j},N_{j}\},\Psi)

and the target curvature

\kappa^{t}(s)

. The differentiable simulation provides exact derivatives (such as

\partial\mathbf{r}_{\textrm{tip}}/\partial\alpha_{j}

) via automatic differentiation, enabling efficient gradient-based updates of

\{\alpha_{j}\}

(for fixed

\{N_{j}\}

) and the actuation input

\Psi

range. (D) Snapshots of the scissor mechanism’s deployment as the tip traces a circular trajectory. The red colored stroke indicates the tip trajectory, and the inset shows the aspect-ratio,

\{\alpha_{j}\}

obtained using the optimization procedure. (E) Comparison between target curves (blue) and tip trajectories (red) when the mechanism traces the characters

j

and

D

, as a tribute to the automaton artist Jaques-Droz. The color gradient from light to dark indicates tracing direction as

\Psi

decreases from

\Psi_{\max}

to

\Psi_{\min}

. Insets show the optimized aspect-ratio profiles

\{\alpha_{j}\}

, where

j

indexes the scissor-units. See SI Video 3 for a visualization of the mechanism performing the writing task.

Figure S1 : (A) Three scissor-units with the same aspect ratio are assembled by connecting neighboring units. Their center nodes are marked by the yellow points

\mathbf{r}_{j-1}

,

\mathbf{r}_{j}

, and

\mathbf{r}_{j+1}

. Using the turning-angle definition, the curvature is given by the angle

\vartheta_{j}

between the vectors joining adjacent center nodes, namely

\mathbf{v}_{j-1}

and

\mathbf{v}_{j}

(visualized in green). The associated length scale is defined as

|\mathbf{v}_{j-1}|+|\mathbf{v}_{j}|

. (B) For a single scissor-unit, the green circle is the osculating circle of radius

R_{\mathrm{osc}}

; the member orientation vectors

\hat{\mathbf{t}}^{(1)}

and

\hat{\mathbf{t}}^{(2)}

are tangent to this circle. (C) A two-segment scissor mechanism for an arbitrary choice of the base center node position

\mathbf{r}_{0}

and the initial orientation

\hat{\mathbf{p}}_{1}

. For a given actuation angle

\Psi

, each section

j

is modeled as a circular arc with center of curvature

\tilde{\mathbf{q}}_{j}

and radius

\kappa_{j}^{-1}

. At the interface between sections (node

\mathbf{r}_{1}

), the change in aspect ratio from

\alpha_{1}

to

\alpha_{2}

requires a shift

\zeta_{j}^{j+1}

between successive centers of curvature to maintain geometric continuity (from

\tilde{\mathbf{q}}_{1}

to

\tilde{\mathbf{q}}_{2}

). The final tip position

\mathbf{r}_{\text{tip}}

is obtained by iterating these section-wise rotations and translations.

Figure S2 : (A) Scissor mechanism corresponding to

N=30

with

\alpha=0.52

and

\Psi=\pi/4

. (B) Comparison between shape of scissor mechanism with

N=30

and

\Psi=\pi/4

constructed from full non-linear simulation (shown in blue) for

\alpha_{j}=\alpha_{0}+\epsilon j

and perturbative solution in Eq. ( S31 ) (shown in gray). We see a good match between the perturbative solution and the full solution. We have chosen

\alpha_{0}=0.52,\epsilon=0.001

.

Figure S3 : Algorithm used for the differentiable framework for the writing task explained in Sec. S6 . The four steps involved in this framework are:

(i)

Target processing - normalization of raw target coordinates to a unit bounding box followed by arc-length parameterization to extract the smoothed target curvature profile

\kappa^{t}(s)

;

(ii)

Differentiable forward model - evaluation of tip trajectory via forward kinematics and subsequent reparameterization from

\Psi

to arc length

s

to obtain the intrinsic mechanism curvature

\kappa_{\text{tip}}(s^{M})

as a differentiable function of arc length;

(iii)

Gradient descent - iterative optimization of design parameters

\bm{\theta}

using the Adam optimizer, with exact gradients of the composite loss

\mathcal{L}[\bm{\theta}]

computed via automatic differentiation;

(iv)

Arc-length alignment - differentiable linear interpolation of the mechanism curvature onto the fixed target arc-length grid to enables a pointwise error comparison.

Figure S4 : Collage of the tip trajectories for a mechanism with

N=50

and 15 independent realizations using random initializations. The minimum (Run 13, Loss: 0.5329) is selected as the optimal configuration, while other runs capture varying degrees of target character fidelity or converge to suboptimal local minima.

Figure S5 : Collage of the tip trajectories from 15 independent optimization runs for a fixed number of units

N=8

. While many runs converge to the target circle with low loss (e.g., Run 6, Loss: 0.0582), some realizations fall into local minima with high loss (e.g., Run 8, Loss: 5.8510), highlighting the complex optimization landscape.

Figure S6 : (A) The plot displays the sensitivity

\sigma_{j}

, defined as the variance of the tip displacement distribution

p(\Delta r^{(j)})

, against the normalized unit index

j/N

. Results for different mechanism sizes (

N=100,200,300

) collapse onto a single curve, showing that the sensitivity profile is independent of the total number of units when scaled by the mechanism’s length. The data indicates that the distal tip position is most sensitive to perturbations in units located near the base (

j/N\to 0

) and becomes progressively more robust to geometric errors as the unit index approaches the tip (

j/N\to 1

).

Figure S7 : Three-dimensional view of CAD model of the controller-actuator setup. This setup includes a high-torque servo that drives the actuating unit; an Arduino Nano microcontroller processing logic; a potentiometer for manual angle control; a start/stop button for simple triggering; and an AC connector for stable external power.

Morphing of and writing with a scissor linkage mechanism

Abstract

Figures & tables

Mechanism Design

Kinematic Reward, Measured Effort: Hardware-Validated RL Morphology Optimization of a Planar 2R Manipulator

ZipFold: Modular Actuators for Scaleable Adaptive Robots

Assembling Two Parts in One Hand

Abstract

Mechanism Design

Explore similar work

Kinematic Reward, Measured Effort: Hardware-Validated RL Morphology Optimization of a Planar 2R Manipulator

ZipFold: Modular Actuators for Scaleable Adaptive Robots

Assembling Two Parts in One Hand