Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has been shown effective in enhancing the visual reflection and reasoning capabilities of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). However, existing datasets are predominantly derived from either small-scale manual construction or recombination of prior resources, which limits data diversity and coverage, thereby constraining further gains in model performance. To this end, we introduce DeepVision-103K, a comprehensive dataset for RLVR training that covers diverse K12 mathematical topics, extensive knowledge points, and rich visual elements. Models trained on DeepVision achieve strong performance on multimodal mathematical benchmarks, and generalize effectively to general multimodal reasoning tasks. Further analysis reveals enhanced visual perception, reflection and reasoning capabilities in trained models, validating DeepVision's effectiveness for advancing multimodal reasoning. Data: this url.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The number of different visual element types of training datasets.
Figure 2: Performance on multimodal math and general multimodal benchmarks, we report averaged Pass@1 accuracy across benchmarks.
Figure 3: A data sample from DeepVision-103K.
Field
Description
Question & Image
A multimodal mathematical problem consisting of a textual problem statement and the corresponding image.
Final Answer
A unique, verifiable answer that enables rule-based reward computation in RLVR.
Pass Rate
The proportion of correct responses obtained during model rollouts.
Topic
A hierarchical classification indicating which branch of mathematics the problem belongs to.
Knowledge Points
A list of specific mathematical concepts, theorems, or techniques required to solve the problem.
Visual Elements
A list of geometric or graphical objects depicted in the image, describing what visual content should be perceived and interpreted.
Table 2: Visual categories and element coverage in DeepVision-103K.
Figure 5: Mathematical topics in DeepVision-103K.
Figure 6: Curation pipeline for mathematical data in DeepVision-103K.
Model
Multimodal Math
General Multimodal
WeMath
MathVision
MathVersevision
LogicVista
MMMUval
MMMUPro
M3CoT
Closed-source Models
GPT-5-Nano-High
78.62
58.75
70.30
58.03
70.78
70.64
69.15
Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite
83.85
52.47
70.30
60.49
64.77
65.08
68.42
Qwen3-VL-8B Series
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
79.36
51.44
67.38
61.16
67.66
67.69
70.83
Table 3: Performance comparison across multimodal mathematical reasoning and general multimodal benchmarks. We report Pass@1 accuracy (%). The best results for each model family are shown in bold .
Figure 7: Enhanced Capabilities
Figure 8: DeepVision model correctly identifies the shaded region on the first attempt.
Figure 9: DeepVision model actively re-examines visual content to correct errors, while the base model merely rephrases without genuine verification.
Figure 10: DeepVision model systematically enumerates all possible angle combinations and concludes the type cannot be determined, while the Instruct model incorrectly assumes symmetry without justification.
Data Composition
Multimodal Math
General Multimodal
WeMath
MathVision
MathVerse
LogicVista
Avg.
MMMU val
MMMU pro
M3CoT
Avg.
MiMo-VL-7B
74.42
50.69
72.71
60.71
64.63
63.77
60.69
70.02
64.83
DeepVision-103K 200
82.98
55.23
76.26
65.92
70.10
71.00
69.19
72.56
70.92
w/o visual logic data
Math-77K 150
81.67
54.83
74.23
63.98
68.68
70.00
68.55
72.09
70.21
Math-77K 200
82.07
55.72
74.74
63.53
69.02
68.50
69.67
72.65
70.27
Table 4: Ablation studies on data composition and quality. We report Pass@1 accuracy (%) across mathematical reasoning and general multimodal benchmarks. All experiments used MiMo-VL-7B-SFT-2508 as the base model.
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often struggle with complex mathematical visual reasoning primarily due to a lack of fine-grained perception, causing initial visual hallucinations to directly trigger cascading reasoning failures. In traditional end-to-end reinforcement learning (RL), sparse rewards fail to decouple perceptual hallucinations from logical missteps, hindering targeted perception optimization. Alternatively, fine-tuning with perception-enhanced CoT data incurs high costs and hallucinations. In this paper, we address these challenges by proposing UniCAR-RL, an annotation-free RL framework. By explicitly decoupling the optimization of perception and reasoning during the training process, it achieves isolation and optimization of both capabilities. Specifically, UniCAR-RL consists of three synergistic branches: 1) a Caption-RL branch that optimizes perception capabilities through verifier-guided reasoning validation; 2) a Reasoning-RL branch that performs logical reasoning based on a gold image description to halt cascading errors; 3) a QA-RL branch that retains native end-to-end alignment to ensure robust question-answering performance. Experiments show that UniCAR-RL substantially improves MLLMs' mathematical and visual reasoning using only raw short-answer data. Furthermore, it demonstrates strong generalization across diverse architectures and scales.
Yuzhe Li, Hao Yan, Hao Wang +6
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · Huawei Inc.
Recent progress in large-scale reinforcement learning (RL) has notably enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), especially in mathematical domains. However, current multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) for mathematical reasoning often rely on one-to-one image-text pairs and single-solution supervision, overlooking the diversity of valid reasoning perspectives and internal reflections. In this work, we introduce MathV-DP, a novel dataset that captures multiple diverse solution trajectories for each image-question pair, fostering richer reasoning supervision. We further propose Qwen-VL-DP, a model built upon Qwen-VL, fine-tuned with supervised learning and enhanced via group relative policy optimization (GRPO), a rule-based RL approach that integrates correctness discrimination and diversity-aware reward functions. Our method emphasizes learning from varied reasoning perspectives and distinguishing between correct yet distinct solutions. Extensive experiments on the MathVista's minitest and Math-V benchmarks demonstrate that Qwen-VL-DP significantly outperforms prior base MLLMs in both accuracy and generative diversity, highlighting the importance of incorporating diverse perspectives and reflective reasoning in multimodal mathematical reasoning.
Wenhao Shi, Zhiqiang Hu, Yi Bin +4
Tongji University, Shanghai, China · National University of Singapore, Singapore · Tencent, Beijing, China +2
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has extended from purely linguistic domains to multimodal scenarios; however, existing approaches often treat visual inputs as homogeneous or auxiliary signals, failing to capture the intricate and sample-specific dependencies between text and images in mathematical problem-solving. This gives rise to two core issues: first, the supervisory signals for visual content are generalized and coarse-grained, lacking adaptation to the actual necessity of visual information in each sample; second, training feedback becomes inaccurate when visual rewards are uniformly applied without distinguishing the complementary relationships among inputs. These limitations hinder models from achieving precise multimodal reasoning. In this work, we propose a framework for modeling fine-grained visual dependencies in mathematical reasoning. We first construct the MathVis-Fine dataset, augmenting fine-grained visual annotations with visual dependency ratings. Building upon this dataset, we introduce a two-stage progressive visual enhancement training paradigm that balances answer correctness rewards and visual grounding rewards according to the intrinsic visual dependency level of each sample, thereby mitigating reward bias and improving supervision accuracy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the MathVis-Fine framework effectively enhances visual perception progressively based on visual dependency, offering a more precise training framework for multimodal mathematical reasoning. We will release the dataset upon acceptance.
Wanshi Xu, Haokun Zhao, Haidong Yuan +2
School of ECE, Peking University · College of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University · School of Software and Microelectronics, Peking University +1