Learning under noisy supervision is governed by a feedback-truth gap
Organizations: Department of Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA · Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Abstract
When feedback is absorbed faster than task structure can be evaluated, the learner will favor feedback over truth. A two-timescale model shows this feedback-truth gap is inevitable whenever the two rates differ and vanishes only when they match. We test this prediction across neural networks trained with noisy labels (30 datasets, 2,700 runs), human probabilistic reversal learning (N = 292), and human reward/punishment learning with concurrent EEG (N = 25). In each system, truth is defined operationally: held-out labels, the objectively correct option, or the participant's pre-feedback expectation - the only non-circular reference decodable from post-feedback EEG. The gap appeared universally but was regulated differently: dense networks accumulated it as memorization; sparse-residual scaffolding suppressed it; humans generated transient over-commitment that was actively recovered. Neural over-commitment (~0.04-0.10) was amplified tenfold into behavioral commitment (d = 3.3-3.9). The gap is a fundamental constraint on learning under noisy supervision; its consequences depend on the regulation each system employs.
Figures & tables
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Dataset | Samples | Features | Classes | OpenML ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ionosphere | 351 | 34 | 2 | 59 |
| Glass | 214 | 9 | 6 | 41 |
| Sonar | 208 | 60 | 2 | 40 |
| WDBC | 569 | 30 | 2 | 1510 |
| Vehicle | 846 | 18 | 4 | 54 |
| Analysis | Measure | Statistic | -value | Effect size | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human probabilistic reversal learning (Eckstein 2022) | |||||
| PRL AUG | 292 | ||||
| PRL recovery | 292 | trials | 99.3% | – | – |
| Human reward/punishment learning (Stolz 2022) | |||||
| REW commitment | 25 | ||||
| PUN commitment | 25 | ||||
Learning with Noisy Labels
Learning with noisy labels studies how to train reliable models when annotations are incorrect, incomplete, subjective, or weakly supervised.
See all 150 papers