Organizations: Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore · Guangzhou Research Translation and Innovation Institute, National University of Singapore, Guangzhou, China · College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore · Beijing Key Laboratory of Brainnetome and Brain-Computer Interface, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · Institute of Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (EFMs) have shown strong potential for transferable representation learning, yet their adaptation in realistic settings remains challenging when only a few labeled subjects are available. We show that this challenge stems from a structural mismatch between noisy, limited supervision and the highly plastic parameter space of EFMs, reflected in three key failure modes: overconfident miscalibration, prediction collapse, and representation drift caused by unconstrained parameter updates. To address these challenges, we propose SCOPE, a Structured COnfidence-aware Prototype-guided framework for label-limited EFM adaptation. SCOPE first constructs cohort-level external supervision to provide persistent guidance and further derives confidence-aware pseudo-labels to select reliable unlabeled samples for adaptation. Building on the constructed external supervision, SCOPE introduces ProAdapter, a lightweight prototype-conditioned adapter that modulates frozen EFMs to preserve pretrained representations. Experiments across 50 label-limited adaptation settings, covering 6 EEG tasks, 5 EFM backbones, and 5%-50% training labeled-subject ratios, show that SCOPE consistently achieves strong performance and efficiency.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Empirical motivation for label-limited EFM adaptation: adapting CodeBrain on ISRUC with 30% labeled subjects reveals (A) large generalization gap; (B) overconfident miscalibration; (C) training collapse across seeds; and (D) layer-wise representation drift. (E) These observations motivate our shift from self-training, sample-level pseudo-labels, and full fine-tuning toward external cohort-level structured supervision, confidence-aware pseudo-labeling, and conditioned adaptation.
Figure 2: Overview of the two-stage SCOPE framework. Left : External structured supervision construction progressively induces class-level prototypes and confidence-aware pseudo-labels for unlabeled data. Right : A frozen EEG foundation model is adapted via lightweight prototype-conditioned adapters in the last layers, using confidence-weighted supervision for controlled adaptation.
Backbone
Method
ISRUC
SEED
Mental
PhysioNet-MI
SHU-MI
CHB-MIT
Kappa
WF1
AUPRC
AUC
AUPRC
AUC
Kappa
WF1
AUPRC
AUC
AUPRC
AUC
Non-Pretrained
EEGNet
45.40
52.02
53.39
54.15
40.35
63.75
34.20
50.82
51.60
53.02
16.21
69.26
EEGConformer
47.70
53.93
54.31
53.48
38.92
62.31
34.72
51.38
52.24
53.58
18.38
71.55
Transformer-based backbones
LaBraM
Frozen
48.58
58.35
72.45
73.89
60.83
79.25
22.81
41.80
61.81
63.49
30.53
86.30
+LoRA
55.61
65.05
67.51
57.28
64.47
54.16
22.79
41.69
61.55
63.12
32.16
86.96
Table 1: Baseline comparisons under the limited-label setting (30% labeled subjects).
Method
CSBrain (Transformer-based)
CodeBrain (SSM-Style)
Kappa
Δ %
WF1
Δ %
Kappa
Δ %
WF1
Δ %
Frozen
56.27 ± 1.49
–
64.98 ± 1.16
–
52.54 ± 1.40
–
61.75 ± 1.25
–
Ablation on Supervision Construction
w/o ETF-guide †
60.04 ± 2.39
↓ 2.38%
68.15 ± 2.07
↓ 2.45%
61.48 ± 1.72
↓ 3.12%
68.87 ± 1.35
↓ 3.15%
w/o Prototype Clustering †
59.16 ± 1.24
↓ 3.82%
67.53 ± 1.32
↓ 3.33%
60.76 ± 0.94
↓ 4.25%
67.91 ± 0.86
↓ 4.50%
w/o Supervision construction
58.30 ± 1.63
↓ 5.22%
66.74 ± 1.51
↓ 4.47%
59.01 ± 1.45
↓ 7.01%
66.78 ± 1.03
↓ 6.09%
Table 2: Ablation on ISRUC with 30% labels. Methods with † additionally use pseudo-labeled data.
Figure 3: Sensitivity analysis on ProAdapter depth and confidence threshold.
Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models learn reusable representations of brain signals for transfer across people, tasks, and recording setups.
EEG foundation models pretrained via self-supervised learning promise transferable representations, but their generalization remains limited, especially across diverse clinical datasets. Full fine-tuning is impractical for resource-constrained clinical settings due to high computational requirements. In this work, we investigate whether parameter-efficient self-supervised adaptation, updating only 9% of parameters suffices to align representations to target tasks. We evaluate our method on two state-of-the-art models with different pretraining objectives: BIOT (contrastive) and CBraMod (masked reconstruction), and evaluate on three clinical EEG datasets for abnormality detection (TUAB), event classification (TUEV), and seizure detection (CHB-MIT) under both in-distribution and out-of-distribution conditions. SSL adaptation yields consistent gains over linear probing, up to 20x AUCPR. Under a fixed compute budget, peak performance requires only 20--50% of available unlabeled data. Critically, when total window count is fixed, performance remains invariant to patient count, suggesting that performance is dependent on overall temporal window diversity only. Our findings demonstrate that parameter-efficient adaptation enables effective deployment of EEG Foundation models (EEG-FM) with minimal computational overhead and data collection burden. Code available at: https://github.com/c3n-group/efficient-eeg-adapt
Meghal Dani, Stefanie Liebe
University of Tübingen, Germany · Hertie Institute for AI in Brain Health (Hertie AI), Tübingen, Germany · Dept. of Neurology and Epileptology, University Clinic Tübingen, Germany +1
Scaling EEG foundation models requires pooling data across heterogeneous electrode montages, a prerequisite both for larger pretraining corpora and for downstream deployment. We present the first systematic comparison of four channel adaptation methods (Conv1d projection, spherical spline interpolation (SSI), source-space decomposition, and Riemannian re-centering) across five pretrained EEG foundation models (5M--157M parameters), five downstream tasks, and two training regimes with 10--15 random seeds each. We find that rigid-montage models (BENDR, Neuro-GPT) require external adaptation, while flexible models (EEGPT, CBraMod) match or exceed it natively when fine-tuned but benefit from external methods under frozen-encoder deployment. A probe-SFT asymmetry exists: external adaptation can cause severe negative transfer during fine-tuning of flexible models. The optimal method is architecture-dependent (Conv1d for BENDR, SSI/Riemannian for Neuro-GPT, source-space decomposition for depression detection), and 5M-parameter CBraMod outperforms models up to 31× larger on 4/5 datasets, consistent with independent findings that compact EEG-specific architectures can match larger models.
Kuntal Kokate, Bruno Aristimunha, Dung Truong +1
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA · Yneuro, Paris, France · Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
EEG foundation models (EFMs) capture reusable knowledge from large-scale EEG data, while many EEG recordings also include companion physiological signals that provide complementary information beyond the EEG-only interface. The challenge is to preserve this pretrained knowledge while extending the EFM to heterogeneous multimodal recordings through an adaptation inferred from unlabeled target data. We introduce ZeroMAG, a zero-shot multimodal adapter generation framework that extends a frozen EEG encoder and prediction head using unlabeled target recordings, without target labels or target-side optimization. The target datasets are held out from all model training and selection in the ZeroMAG pipeline. ZeroMAG organizes companion modalities around a configuration-invariant adapter, constructs a modality-subject-task condition from unlabeled recordings and task context, and generates adapter weights in a function-constrained latent space learned from source adapters. Across six held-out target datasets and three EFM backbones, ZeroMAG improves balanced accuracy by 7.22 percentage points over EEG-only inference and 4.89 points over direct weight regression, while coming within 0.50 points of supervised multimodal adaptation on average. Ablations further show that removing functional supervision from either representation learning or conditional generation degrades generated-adapter performance, confirming the contribution of both components.
Yubo Wang, Jingying Ma, Xinliang Zhou +8
Brown University · Stanford University · National University of Singapore +4