Partial Optimality in the Preordering Problem

This work considers a number of optimization problems and reductive relations between them. The two main problems we are interested in are the Optimal Decision Tree and Set Cover. We study these two fundamental tasks under precedence constraints, that is, if a test (or set) $X$ is a predecessor of $Y$, then in any feasible decision tree $X$ needs to be an ancestor of $Y$ (or respectively, if $Y$ is added to set cover, then so must be $X$). For the Optimal Decision Tree we consider two optimization criteria: worst case identification time (height of the tree) or the average identification time. Similarly, for the Set Cover we study two cost measures: the size of the cover or the average cover time. Our approach is to develop a number of algorithmic reductions, where an approximation algorithm for one problem provides an approximation for another via a black-box usage of a procedure for the former. En route we introduce other optimization problems either to complete the `reduction landscape' or because they hold the essence of combinatorial structure of our problems. The latter is brought by a problem of finding a Maximum Density Precedence-Closed Subfamily, where the density is defined as the ratio of the number of items the family covers to its size. We provide $\mathcal{O}^*(\sqrt{m})$-approximation polynomial-time algorithms for all aforementioned problems. The picture is complemented by a number of hardness reductions that provide $\mathcal{O}(m^{1/12-ε})$-inapproximability results for the decision tree and covering problems. Besides giving a complete set of results for general precedence constraints, we also provide polylogarithmic approximation guarantees for two most typically studied and applicable graph types, outforests and inforests. By providing corresponding hardness results, we show most of these results to be tight.

When a student must learn concepts connected by prerequisite dependencies, when does the order of instruction matter, and what does it cost to find the best one? We study instructional sequencing as a stochastic shortest-path problem in which attempting a concept succeeds with a state-dependent probability and failure leaves the learner state unchanged. We first prove that this stochasticity can be eliminated exactly: the problem collapses to a deterministic shortest-path problem on the lattice of prerequisite order ideals, preserving optimal values and actions. The collapse removes stochastic complexity but not combinatorial complexity: optimal sequencing remains NP-hard -- via reduction from feedback arc set in tournaments -- even with no prerequisite edges, unit costs, uniform binary nonnegative transfer, and success probabilities at least $1/2$. Hardness is not uniform: when realizable transfer preferences remain jointly acyclic with the prerequisites, any topological order of the residual joint graph is optimal, and fixed prerequisite width yields polynomial-time exact dynamic programming. A computable diagnostic, $mΔ$, bounds the value of sequencing before optimization. On 70,893 interactions from an introductory CS course, the diagnostic certifies a doubly easy regime -- little value to optimize and little space to search -- while constructed transfer instances realize the challenging regime, where myopic sequencing suffers large regret yet exact A* with a consistent heuristic expands only linearly many states on that family.

Active seriation aims at recovering an unknown ordering of $n$ items by adaptively querying pairwise similarities. The observations are noisy measurements of entries of an underlying $n$ x $n$ permuted Robinson matrix, whose permutation encodes the latent ordering. The framework allows the algorithm to start with partial information on the latent ordering, including seriation from scratch as a special case. We propose an active seriation algorithm that provably recovers the latent ordering with high probability. Under a uniform separation condition on the similarity matrix, optimal performance guarantees are established, both in terms of the probability of error and the number of observations required for successful recovery.