Mineral prospectivity mapping requires synthesizing heterogeneous geological knowledge, including textual deposit models and geospatial datasets, to identify regions likely to host specific mineral deposit types. This process is traditionally manual and knowledge-intensive. We present QueryPlot, a semantic retrieval and mapping framework that integrates large-scale geological text corpora with geologic map data using modern Natural Language Processing techniques. We curate descriptive deposit models for over 120 deposit types and transform the State Geologic Map Compilation (SGMC) polygons into structured textual representations. Given a user-defined natural language query, the system encodes both queries and region descriptions using a pretrained embedding model and computes semantic similarity scores to rank and spatially visualize regions as continuous evidence layers. QueryPlot supports compositional querying over deposit characteristics, enabling aggregation of multiple similarity-derived layers for multi-criteria prospectivity analysis. In a case study on tungsten skarn deposits, we demonstrate that embedding-based retrieval achieves high recall of known occurrences and produces prospective regions that closely align with expert-defined permissive tracts. Furthermore, similarity scores can be incorporated as additional features in supervised learning pipelines, yielding measurable improvements in classification performance. QueryPlot is implemented as a web-based system supporting interactive querying, visualization, and export of GIS-compatible prospectivity layers.To support future research, we have made the source code and datasets used in this study publicly available.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. QueryPlot helps geologists accelerate mineral exploration workflow through automating document summarization, geologic maps database retrieval, and evidence layer visualization. It offloads the burden of interacting with multiple tools and managing different data products from geologists.
Figure 2. System overview of QueryPlot . Upper left: Geologic map data are processed to generate long description for each polygon. Lower left: Long documents are summarized into descriptive deposit models using LLM. Lower right: Semantic similarity between textual queries and polygon descriptions are computed and visualized as evidence layers. Upper right: A prototype system with user-friendly UI helps geologists accelerate the mineral exploration workflow.
Figure 3. Merging multiple individual polygons with same geologic signatures into one multi-polygon.
Characteristic
Description
Synonyms
Pyrometasomatic or contact metasomatic tungsten deposits.
Commodities
W, Mo, Cu, Sn, Zn
Description
Scheelite-dominant mineralization genetically associated with a skarn gangue.
Rock types
Pure and impure limestones, calcareous to carbonaceous pelites. Associated with tonalite, granodiorite, quartz monzonite and granite of both I- and S-types. W skarn-related granitoids, compared to Cu skarn- related plutonic rocks, tend to be more differentiated, more contaminated with sedimentary material, and have crystallized at a deeper structural level.
Textures
Porphyry has closely spaced phenocrysts and microaplitic quartz-feldspar groundmass.
Age range
Mainly Mesozoic, but may be any age.
Table 1. An example of selected characteristics of the descriptive model for tungsten skarn deposits from ( Day et al., 2016 ) .
Figure 4. Example prompt for summarizing documents into short and concise descriptive deposit models.
Figure 5. An evidence layer generated for national scale tungsten skarn exploration. The layer was generated from query ‘‘tonalite, granodiorite, quartz monzonite and granite.’’ , which includes the most common source rocks characteristic of tungsten skarn deposit model. Zoomed-in regions at the bottom shows the effect of different percentage threshold values, with higher threshold resulting in fewer polygons.
Figure 6. An example of finding high-potential areas adjacent to prospective regions from two evidence layers. (1) and (2) – Buffer two evidence layers by a distance of r1 . (3) – calculate the overlapping region of the buffered layers. (4) – Buffer the intersected area by a distance of r2 .
Figure 7. (1) The focus area of Tungsten skarn potential mapping case study. (2) Schematic representation of skarn deposits ( Lederer et al., 2021 )
Figure 8. Comparison of generated evidence layers and mineral sites (blue regions: high-ranking polygons in the host_rocks layer, red regions: high-ranking polygons in the source_rocks layer, yellow circles: mineral sites). (a)(c)(d): most sites are located near the contact regions of host and source rocks. (b): some sites do not lie on contact region but are captured by the source evidence layer.
Figure 9. Recall curve of QueryPlot , random ranking, and oracle ranking on site retrieval.
Figure 10. Comparison between QueryPlot prediction and ground truth. Purple regions: contact layer derived from high-ranking polygons in the host_rocks and source_rocks evidence layers. Orange regions (mesh): permissive tracts from ( Lederer et al., 2021 ) . (b)(c)(d): good alignment with ground truth with examples of ‘false positive’ regions. (a): missed regions that are possibly due to lack of descriptive attributes in the query with keywords consistent with the deposit model.
Figure 11. Best F1 scores with respect to different combination of thresholds for host_rocks and source_rocks evidence layers.
Approach
embedding
IOU
Precision
Recall
F1
QueryPlot + GTE ( Zhang et al., 2024b )
base-v1.5
42.74
49.03
76.92
59.89
large-v1.5
63.14
79.89
75.07
77.40
QueryPlot + BGE ( Xiao et al., 2024 )
small-v1.5
60.63
68.45
84.14
75.49
base-v1.5
61.18
75.01
76.83
75.91
large-v1.5
48.53
51.97
87.99
65.34
m3 ( Chen et al., 2024 )
52.80
68.63
69.59
69.11
Table 2. QueryPlot evaluation results on unsupervised Tungsten skarn MPM. All the numbers are best performance acquired through grid search over hyperparameters.
Data split
Metric
GFM ( Daruna et al., 2024 )
GFM ( Daruna et al., 2024 ) + QueryPlot
Validation
AUPRC
47.31
43.52
AUC
89.28
90.45
F1
43.13
46.91
Test
AUPRC
41.53
43.04 (+1.51)
Bal. Acc
72.39
78.37 (+5.98)
AUC †
91.85
92.91
Table 3. Evaluation results on supervised Tungsten skarn MPM. A geology evidence layer generated from QueryPlot is used as an additional input channel to the binary classifier. †Metrics that are not suited for measuring performance on imbalanced data .
Figure 12. The QueryPlot prototype system has a user friendly GUI that supports rich features, including flexible and customizable data pre-processing, interactive layer visualization, real-time filtering, and exporting processed layers to common formats readable by popular GIS software.
Mineral exploration requires integrating heterogeneous geochemical, geophysical, and geological evidence, yet existing prospectivity systems often provide only opaque scores or heatmaps. We present MineTRACE, a web-based system for evidence-grounded exploration of eight commodities: Cu, Au, Ni, W, Sn, Co, Ta, and Mn. Users can explore prospectivity maps, query locations or regions, inspect supporting evidence, and interact through natural language. A transparent expert tree, informed by geological knowledge and known deposits, combines multi-source evidence into interpretable prospectivity scores. For a new location, the conversational assistant retrieves the score and supporting evidence from the analysis pipeline and presents them in natural language. The scorer achieves spatial AUC values of up to 0.917 across different test scenarios, while end-to-end evaluation assesses query accuracy and response grounding. MineTRACE makes public geoscience data easier to access, interpret, and verify, supporting more efficient and transparent mineral exploration.
Yiran Zhang, Jinwen Liu, Daniel Su +7
1The University of Western Australia · 2Wilfrid Laurier University
Critical mineral discovery is a positive-only problem: deposits are observed as sparse locations, while unlabeled regions are not reliable negatives, and similar geophysical signatures can arise from different subsurface states. We therefore model mineral targeting as learning a conditional spatial distribution over occurrence locations, π(p∣d), given geo-images d, rather than predicting a deterministic per-pixel score map. We introduce GeoCFM, a conditional flow-matching model that generates mineral occurrence point sets conditioned on multi-channel geo-images; GeoCFM learns a point-wise transport field in R2, using UNet features with point-conditioned velocity prediction to bridge dense rasters and sparse supervision without pseudo-negatives. On a synthetic magnetics--geochemistry benchmark with latent activation and on USGS Earth MRI data with a spatially disjoint tile split, GeoCFM improves geometric agreement with observed occurrences over score-map and non-conditional baselines, while representing epistemic uncertainty through conditional sampling.
Moshe Eliasof, Eldad Haber
Faculty of Computer and Information Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel · Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Canada
Exploration drill targeting in structurally complex terranes is hindered by sparse sampling, heterogeneous datasets, and the ambiguity of geophysical inversions. Here, we present an uncertainty-aware 3D workflow for the acceleration of time-to-discovery in brownfield explorations and apply it to the Kogodai prospect in the Rudny Altai metallogenic province. We jointly analyse existing drilling and geophysical data in a comprehensive approach, revealing hidden patterns in already available data. Drillholes and trenches were desurveyed to a common 3D reference frame, and assays were composited to a consistent spatial support to facilitate joint modelling with geophysical inputs. We develop Bayesian deep-learning models to predict 3D fields of Cu grade together with chargeability and apparent resistivity while quantifying epistemic uncertainty via Monte Carlo sampling. The original contribution of this work is to treat the problem not as pointwise regression between co-located observations, but as joint learning of spatially continuous 3D fields from sparse, heterogeneous exploration evidence. The resulting 3D predictions delineate a principal mineralized trend and several localized candidate zones that coincide with elevated induced polarization (IP) responses, while uncertainty mapping highlights where predictions are robust versus where additional drilling would be most informative. The continuous Cu-grade field can also be thresholded to produce binary prospectivity maps, allowing the sensitivity of target delineation to the chosen cutoff to be evaluated. The outputs are intended for qualitative interpretation and risk-aware drill targeting rather than resource estimation, and we discuss key limitations arising from incomplete provenance metadata for geophysical products and heterogeneity of historical sampling.