cs.LGFeb 23, 2026

The Sample Complexity of Replicable Realizable PAC Learning

Authors: Kasper Green Larsen, Markus Engelund Mathiasen, Chirag Pabbaraju, Clement Svendsen

Organizations: Computer Science Department, Aarhus University · Computer Science Department, Stanford University

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of replicable realizable PAC learning. We construct a particularly hard learning problem and show a sample complexity lower bound with a close to (log⁡∣H∣)3/2(\log|H|)^{3/2} dependence on the size of the hypothesis class HH. Our proof uses several novel techniques and works by defining a particular Cayley graph associated with HH and analyzing a suitable random walk on this graph by examining the spectral properties of its adjacency matrix. Furthermore, we show an almost matching upper bound for the lower bound instance, meaning if a stronger lower bound exists, one would have to consider a different instance of the problem.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Oct 18, 2026

The Optimal Sample Complexity of Pointwise Replicable Agnostic Learning

Pointwise replicability asks that two independently trained predictors, using the same random seed, agree at each fixed query with high probability. We determine its optimal agnostic sample complexity on finite and countable domains. For every nonempty binary class of finite VC dimension d≥1d\ge1, the required number of independent examples is Θ ⁣(dρ2α2+log⁡(1/β)α2)Θ\!\left(\frac{d}{ρ^2α^2}+\frac{\log(1/β)}{α^2}\right), uniformly over independent accuracy, failure, and disagreement parameters α,β,ρ∈(0,1/10)α,β,ρ\in(0,1/10). The learner returns one binary function, may be improper, and uses unrestricted shared randomness. Its sample budget is fixed before observing data, and the replicability guarantee includes queries of zero marginal mass. The main construction combines an ensemble of empirical-risk minimizers with a smooth, signal-dependent risk decomposition. A single shared phase selects the final binary predictor. Record times certify its weak-signal risk, while a uniform bound protects the strong-signal risk at that same selected time. A phase-comparison theorem controls the actual shared-seed execution under simultaneous changes in the marginals and risk coefficients. A rare repair step then makes the confidence cost additive. Together with matching lower bounds, this removes the remaining logarithmic overhead and parameter restrictions in the general countable-domain sample-complexity problem. This extended version also retains the earlier explicit constructions and their proofs, including proper learning for VC-one classes, the full finite-atom class, a faster realizable bound, and counterexamples that separate restrictions of particular algorithms from restrictions of the learning problem.
Oct 16, 2026

PAC Learning with Query Feedback

We study realizable multiclass PAC learning with query feedback, where each training example provides a single binary response indicating whether its true label belongs to a chosen subset from a fixed query family. Our main contribution is the query dimension, a combinatorial parameter that captures both the structure of the hypothesis class and the ability of the available queries to distinguish labels. This parameter generalizes the bandit DS dimension, which it recovers under singleton queries. We establish a sample-complexity lower bound of Ω(D/ε)Ω(D/\varepsilon) and an upper bound of O~(D2/ε)\widetilde{O}(D^2/\varepsilon), suppressing factors polylogarithmic in the number of labels and the failure probability. When the available queries can split every candidate set into two parts of comparable size, we improve the upper bound to O~(D/ε)\widetilde{O}(D/\varepsilon), yielding a characterization up to logarithmic factors.
Aug 31, 2026

Bandit Multiclass PAC Learning: Structural Baselines and a Confidence Direct Sum

How much does high confidence cost when a multiclass learner sees only whether its prediction is correct? We separate two behaviors in realizable bandit PAC learning. An anchored dimension gives a general lower bound that is attained, up to universal constants, by a family of product-block classes. In contrast, for n≥16n\ge16 divisible by four, an affine multiplexer with bandit DS dimension 2n−12n-1 has sample complexity Θ((nmin⁡{n,ln⁡(1/δ)}+ln⁡(1/δ))/ε)Θ((n\min\{n,\ln(1/δ)\}+\ln(1/δ))/\varepsilon) in the standard accuracy and confidence regime. Its lower bound applies to adaptive randomized learners with improper outputs. The obstruction is that evidence collected against one candidate group cannot be reused against the others. The better of two algorithms matches this cost. One finds the correct group through a positive response. The other exhausts the rank of successive groups. The resulting confidence profile rules out a universal additive-confidence bound linear in the bandit DS dimension. Moreover, classes with identical anchored dimension, bandit DS dimension, and pointwise label width can have polynomially different sample complexities. We also sharpen the confidence accounting in ListCascade and show how one positive response replaces the bandit DS dimension by the anchored dimension in a general upper bound.