Organizations: Beijing Normal University · University of Science and Technology of China · University of Coimbra · Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · Northwestern Polytechnical University
Modern large language models (LLMs) excel at generating fluent and faithful translations. However, they struggle to preserve an author's unique literary style, often producing semantically correct but generic outputs. This limitation stems from the inability of current single-model and static multi-agent systems to perceive and adapt to stylistic variations. To address this, we introduce the Style-Adaptive Multi-Agent System (SAMAS), a novel framework that treats style preservation as a signal processing task. Specifically, our method quantifies literary style into a Stylistic Feature Spectrum (SFS) using the wavelet packet transform. This SFS serves as a control signal to dynamically assemble a tailored workflow of specialized translation agents based on the source text's structural patterns. Extensive experiments on translation benchmarks show that SAMAS achieves competitive semantic accuracy against strong baselines, primarily by leveraging its statistically significant advantage in style fidelity.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the SAMAS. The system first quantifies a text’s literary style into a Stylistic Feature Spectrum (SFS) signal. This signal then guides the dynamic allocation of a workflow, which is executed by a pool of specialized agents to produce a stylistically faithful translation that outperforms a single-LLM baseline.
Models
Routing Method
FLORES-200
WMT24
en → xx
xx → en
en → xx
xx → en
XC
KW
XC
KW
XC
KW
XC
KW
Single-LLM
Qwen3-235B-A22B [ 14 ]
-
84.17
78.25
94.05
87.17
73.97
68.57
82.59
77.83
Qwen3-30B-A3B [ 14 ]
-
77.53
70.18
91.55
85.12
66.97
59.97
81.21
77.11
Qwen-mt-plu [ 14 ]
-
86.97
81.27
94.43
87.43
76.21
70.87
84.37
79.40
Table 1: Comparison of translation performance on the FLORES-200 and WMT24 benchmarks, evaluated with XCOMET (XC) and COMETKIWI-23 (KW) metrics. The “Models” column specifies the base LLM used for translation, while the “Routing Method” column details the workflow applied within our SAMAS framework (e.g., dynamic routing or fixed style-based routes). “Qwen3-235B-A22B” denotes the Instruct version. The best and second-best scores are highlighted. Scores marked with * indicate a statistically significant improvement over the strongest multi-agent baseline (TACTIC) with p < 0.05.
Figure 2: Human preference for style fidelity in head-to-head comparisons. In all evaluations, translations generated by SAMAS were consistently favored by human evaluators over those from five different strong baseline models.
Machine translation develops computational methods for converting text, speech, and visual content between languages while preserving meaning and purpose.
The task of authorship style transfer involves rewriting text in the style of a target author while preserving the meaning of the original text. Existing style transfer methods train a single model on large corpora to model all target styles at once: this high-cost approach offers limited flexibility for target-specific adaptation, and often sacrifices meaning preservation for style transfer. In this paper, we propose AuthorMix: a lightweight, modular, and interpretable style transfer framework. We first train individual, style-specific LoRA adapters on a small set of high-resource authors: this allows for the rapid training of specialized adaptation models for each new target using layer-wise adapter mixing via reinforcement learning, necessitating only a handful of target-style training examples. AuthorMix ranks first on the combined style-meaning score among all baselines, including GPT-5.1, and substantially improves meaning preservation over the trained baselines; under human evaluation it is the only method best-or-tied on every dimension.
Sarubi Thillainathan, Ji-Ung Lee, Michael Sullivan +1
Department of Language Science and Technology, Saarland Informatics Campus Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
Large language model (LLM)-based machine translation has advanced cross-cultural communication, yet it still struggles with culture-loaded words (CLWs) in ancient Chinese texts. The challenge extends beyond lexical alignment to deciding when and how culture-dependent knowledge should be explicated for readers lacking relevant background. Literal translation often preserves surface forms while missing underlying concepts, whereas over-explicitation harms conciseness and readability. To address this problem, we formulate CLW translation as a selective explicitation task and propose MACAT, a Multi-Agent Culture-Aware Translation framework that dynamically identifies culturally salient phrases and injects concise explanatory knowledge when necessary. MACAT further incorporates a quality-aware reranking module for candidate selection and a multi-round evaluation agent that assesses translations across terminological precision, readability, fidelity, cultural preservation, and cultural explicitation. Experiments on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) classics and the Analects show that, under a unified GPT-5.4 evaluation setting, MACAT consistently outperforms both the backbone model and general-purpose MT baselines on 100 TCM documents and a 20-chapter subset of the Analects.
Xiaoqi He, Kaixin Lan, Mu You +3
NLP2CT Lab, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau · Institute of International Language Services Studies, Macau Millennium College
Literary translation poses unique challenges due to the scarcity of high-quality annotated data and the need to balance expression fluency with literary effect. We present a multi-aspect iterative refinement framework that generates high-quality translation references and preference data through specialized LLM translators, each targeting a distinct quality dimension. We leverage the generated data for supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. Experiments show that our generated references outperform the original ground truth for SFT by 8.65 CEA100 points. For reinforcement learning, we find that DPO leads to performance degradation in this setting, while leveraging an explicit reward model for GRPO yields an additional 1.51 point improvement. We attribute this to the stability of two-stage training and GRPO's online exploration capability. Our resulting models, LitMT-8B and LitMT-14B, achieve 67.25 and 69.07 CEA100 respectively on the MetaphorTrans English-to-Chinese literary translation benchmark, competitive with Claude Sonnet 4.5 at 68.43, and demonstrate strong generalization to out-of-domain literary work (i.e., O. Henry).