Attention-Based SINR Estimation in User-Centric Non-Terrestrial Networks
Authors: Bruno De Filippo, Alessandro Guidotti, Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli
Organizations: Department of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering (DEI), Univ. of Bologna, Bologna, Italy · National Inter-University Consortium for Telecommunications (CNIT), Bologna, Italy
The signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) is central to performance optimization in user-centric beamforming for satellite-based non-terrestrial networks (NTNs). Its assessment either requires the transmission of dedicated pilots or relies on computing the beamforming matrix through minimum mean squared error (MMSE)-based formulations beforehand, a process that introduces significant computational overhead. In this paper, we propose a low-complexity SINR estimation framework that leverages multi-head self-attention (MHSA) to extract inter-user interference features directly from either channel state information or user location reports. The proposed dual MHSA (DMHSA) models evaluate the SINR of a scheduled user group without requiring explicit MMSE calculations. The architecture achieves a computational complexity reduction by a factor of three in the CSI-based setting and by two orders of magnitude in the location-based configuration, the latter benefiting from the lower dimensionality of user reports. We show that both DMHSA models maintain high estimation accuracy, with the root mean squared error typically below 1 dB with priority-queuing-based scheduled users. These results enable the integration of DMHSA-based estimators into scheduling procedures, allowing the evaluation of multiple candidate user groups and the selection of those offering the highest average SINR and capacity.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : Considered system model.
Fig. 2 : DMHSA SINR estimation model.
SINR estimation method
Computational complexity
MMSE-based
OMMSE=O(NUE,sched2NR)
CSI-DMHSA
ODMHSA(CSI)=O(NUE,schedNCNR)
GEO-DMHSA
ODMHSA(GEO)=O(NUE,sched2NC)
TABLE I : Computational complexity for SINR estimation.
Fig. 3 : Computational complexity as a function of NC with NUE,sched=24 (black dashed line corresponds to NC=8 ).
Parameter
Value
Subcarrier spacing
Δf=120 kHz
Carrier frequency
fc=20 GHz
User bandwidth
B=190.08 MHz
Scenario
Rural [ 8 ]
Channel model
3GPP NTN system-level [ 9 ] [ 10 ]
Number of radiating elements
NR=512
TABLE II : Simulation parameters for DMHSA training.
Fig. 4 : SINR estimation error distribution for different NUE,sched values (random scheduler).
Parameter
Value
Scheduling slot duration
Tslot(sched)=10 ms
Scheduling periodicity
Tsched=2 s
Maximum residual visibility
σvis=50 slots
Unmet capacity factor
σcap=2
Number of priority classes
NPC=2
Minimum capacity request
Cmin={5,20} Mbps
TABLE III : Configuration parameters for PQS.
Fig. 5 : CDF of the SINR estimation absolute error with PQS scheduling for different capacity request ranges ( Cmin/Cmax ).