Organizations: School of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China · Huawei Translation Services Center, China · School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China · State Key Laboratory of Submarine Geoscience, School of Automation and Intelligent Sensing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Text Image Machine Translation (TIMT) aims to translate text embedded in images in the source-language into target-language, requiring synergistic integration of visual perception and linguistic understanding. Existing TIMT methods, whether cascaded pipelines or end-to-end multimodal large language models (MLLMs),struggle with high-resolution text-rich images due to cluttered layouts, diverse fonts, and non-textual distractions, resulting in text omission, semantic drift, and contextual inconsistency. To address these challenges, we propose GLoTran, a global-local dual visual perception framework for MLLM-based TIMT. GLoTran integrates a low-resolution global image with multi-scale region-level text image slices under an instruction-guided alignment strategy, conditioning MLLMs to maintain scene-level contextual consistency while faithfully capturing fine-grained textual details. Moreover, to realize this dual-perception paradigm, we construct GLoD, a large-scale text-rich TIMT dataset comprising 510K high-resolution global-local image-text pairs covering diverse real-world scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GLoTran substantially improves translation completeness and accuracy over state-of-the-art MLLMs, offering a new paradigm for fine-grained TIMT under high-resolution and text-rich conditions.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison of (a) cascade methods, (b) traditional end-to-end models, (c) MLLMs-based models, and (d) our proposed GLoTran for TIMT. Through a dual visual perception strategy integrating global contextual understanding and local textual focus, we enable more complete and accurate TIMT.
Figure 2: Overview of the proposed GLoTran framework. (a) The high-resolution input image is processed by a text region detector to identify candidate textual regions, which are subsequently sorted, merged, and cropped into localized slices. (b) The global image and the local slices are fed into GLoTran with a structured prompt, enabling global contextual understanding and local textual focus for TIMT.
Figure 3: An illustration of the structured prompt design in GLoTran.
Dataset
Text-Rich
Global-Local
Language
Images
Image-Text
ECOIT [ 65 ]
✗
✗
2
479,490
479,490
OCRMT30K [ 25 ]
✗
✗
2
30,000
30,000
DoTA [ 28 ]
✓
✗
2
126,345
126,000
IIMT [ 24 ]
✗
✗
1
89,033
89,033
MIT-10M [ 26 ]
✗
✗
14
840,855
10,931,115
GLoD
✓
✓
5
517,354
517,354
Table 1: The statistics of GLoD and other TIMT dataset.
Figure 4: Overview of GLoD curation pipeline. The construction pipeline systematically generates high-quality global and local translation pairs through five core stages: conceptualization, data collection and pre-filtering, text region detection and grouping, global-local translation, and quality control.
Document
Scene
Poster
Method
Size
Paper ↑
News ↑
Novel ↑
Title ↑
Sign ↑
Introduction ↑
Cover ↑
Leaflet ↑
Avg ↑
Close-Source MLLMs
GPT-4o [ 23 ]
∼ 200B
62.1 / 86.3
51.6 / 85.6
44.2 / 83.4
51.3 / 83.4
46.1 / 83.3
40.1 / 75.3
34.9 / 69.1
43.9 / 71.7
46.8 / 79.9
Qwen-VL-Max [ 1 ]
∼ 72B
60.5 / 85.7
58.3 / 85.7
44.8 / 83.5
50.1 / 81.6
43.2 / 80.5
37.8 / 74.6
34.2 / 67.3
43.7 / 69.9
46.5 / 78.6
Open-Source MLLMs
Qwen2.5-VL-Instruct [ 2 ]
7B
60.7 / 85.8
53.4 / 85.5
27.4 / 78.1
47.9 / 80.1
44.0 / 82.2
36.2 / 72.8
30.3 / 64.4
43.6 / 72.4
42.9 / 77.7
Table 2: Performance comparison of translating English into Chinese with open-source and close-source MLLMs on the MCiTon [ 66 ] test set. We report BLEU/COMET for translation quality of each real-world scenarios. ↑ indicates higher is better. The bold represents the best results, and the underline represents the second best results.
Figure 5: (a)-(b) performance comparison of multilingual translating task with open-source MLLMs on MTIT6 [ 40 ] . (c)-(d) performance analysis with respect to global image resolution and the pre-region translation replay window size η .
Figure 6: Qualitative comparison. The results in □ indicates omissions, those in □ indicate mistranslations, and those in □ indicate hallucinations caused by contextual misunderstanding.
Method
zh → en
zh → ko
ko → zh
jp → zh
Novel
Title
Introduction
Leaflet
InternVL2.5 4B
4.02 / 70.78
1.19 / 60.44
2.57 / 48.20
28.37 / 76.66
18.48 / 75.67
31.44 / 76.10
26.16 / 71.09
21.22 / 63.92
GLoTran (InternVL2.5 4B)
6.68 / 71.46
2.26 / 60.86
5.97 / 58.89
29.93 / 78.33
25.80 / 77.51
38.20 / 79.82
29.47 / 71.52
23.27 / 65.50
Gain △
+66.17 / +0.96
+89.92 / +0.69
+132.29 / +22.18
+5.50 / +2.18
+39.61 / +2.43
+21.56 / +4.88
+12.65 / +0.61
+9.66 / +2.47
Qwen2.5-VL 7B
9.54 / 74.45
4.13 / 66.76
20.23 / 70.27
35.83 / 79.09
27.43 / 78.09
47.91 / 80.09
36.18 / 72.78
43.66 / 72.40
GLoTran (Qwen2.5-VL 7B)
10.99 / 76.78
5.45 / 68.49
22.39 / 70.99
43.81 / 81.84
44.59 / 83.60
53.15 / 82.92
38.93 / 74.12
45.64 / 73.74
Gain △
+15.20 / +3.13
+31.96 / +2.59
+10.68 / +1.02
+22.27 / +3.48
+62.59 / +7.06
+10.93 / +3.53
+7.60 / +1.84
+4.54 / +1.85
Table 3: Ablation study on the effect of GLoTran across different backbone models. We report BLEU and COMET scores for each translation task. The Gain row denotes the relative improvement (%) of GLoTran over its baseline, calculated as (GLoTran−Baseline)/Baseline×100% .
Document
Scene
Poster
Method
Size
Paper ↑
News ↑
Novel ↑
Title ↑
Sign ↑
Introduction ↑
Cover ↑
Leaflet ↑
InternVL3
8B
59.8/86.0
48.9/83.9
31.2/79.8
50.5/82.1
41.8/81.6
32.8/72.6
29.5/66.1
35.8/70.9
InternVL3 ♢
8B
60.5/86.0
45.0/83.7
36.8/81.2
48.1/77.9
36.8/75.6
37.4/73.4
27.8/63.7
46.9/72.9
Qwen2.5-VL
7B
60.7/85.8
53.4/85.5
27.4/78.1
47.9/80.1
44.0/82.2
36.2/72.8
30.3/64.4
43.6/72.4
Qwen2.5-VL ♢
7B
63.5/86.5
46.3/84.0
37.6/81.9
42.6/78.8
37.5/75.2
40.3/73.4
32.9/65.8
44.6/72.9
Qwen3-VL
8B
60.9/86.1
54.3/86.2
43.6/83.1
52.3/81.8
44.2/83.0
33.6/75.8
36.2/70.4
48.2/75.1
Table 4: Components analysis results (BLEU/COMET) of GLoTran on the MCiTon dataset.
Method
Size
Token V ↓
Novel
zh → jp
FTL s ↓
FPS ↑
BLEU ↑
FTL s ↓
FPS ↑
BLEU ↑
Qwen2.5-VL ♡
7B
6.1K
0.098
0.061
27.36
0.098
3.755
11.85
InternVL3 ♡
8B
10K
0.033
0.065
31.74
0.149
2.016
15.02
Qwen3-VL ♡
8B
6.1K
0.099
0.028
9.98
0.093
2.572
18.79
Qwen3-VL ♠
8B
164K
1.081
0.041
43.56
3.297
0.275
22.06
GLoTran ♡
8B
8.4K
3.002
0.035
48.12
0.253
2.285
26.74
Table 5: Comparison of MLLMs in terms of efficiency and accuracy for TIMI. The superscripts ♣ , ♡ , and ♠ denote input resolutions of 224 × 224, 448 × 448, and the original size, respectively.
End-to-end text-image machine translation (TIMT), which directly translates textual content in images across languages, is crucial for real-world multilingual scene understanding. Despite advances in vision-language large models (VLLMs), robustness across diverse visual scenes and low-resource languages remains underexplored due to limited evaluation resources. We present MMTIT-Bench, a human-verified multilingual and multi-scenario benchmark with 1,400 images spanning fourteen non-English and non-Chinese languages and diverse settings such as documents, scenes, and web images, enabling rigorous assessment of end-to-end TIMT. Beyond benchmarking, we study how reasoning-oriented data design improves translation. Although recent VLLMs have begun to incorporate long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, effective thinking paradigms for TIMT are still immature: existing designs either cascade parsing and translation in a sequential manner or focus on language-only reasoning, overlooking the visual cognition central to VLLMs. We propose Cognition-Perception-Reasoning for Translation (CPR-Trans), a data paradigm that integrates scene cognition, text perception, and translation reasoning within a unified reasoning process. Using a VLLM-driven data generation pipeline, CPR-Trans provides structured, interpretable supervision that aligns perception with reasoning. Experiments on 3B and 7B models show consistent gains in accuracy and interpretability. We will release MMTIT-Bench to promote the multilingual and multi-scenario TIMT research upon acceptance.
Gengluo Li, Chengquan Zhang, Yupu Liang +9
Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Tencent +3
This work presents a comparative evaluation of machine translation systems applied to images containing textual information, a task that lies at the intersection of computer vision and natural language processing. The study compares three main paradigms: modular pipelines that separate text detection, recognition, and translation; multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) capable of processing both image and text jointly; and an end-to-end model, Translatotron-V, which directly generates translated images. The modular systems employ state-of-the-art OCR (docTR) combined with multilingual LLMs such as Llama and EuroLLM, while the evaluated MLLMs include different configurations of Gemini 2.5. Experiments were conducted on parallel multilingual datasets covering multiple language pairs, with evaluation based on BLEU, chrF, and TER metrics. The results show that modular pipelines outperform the end-to-end approach, while MLLMs achieve the best overall performance, demonstrating superior flexibility and contextual understanding. These findings underscore the effectiveness of multi-modal reasoning for image-to-text translation and provide a solid foundation for future research on integrating visual understanding and language generation in multilingual settings.
Blai Puchol, Sergio Gómez González, Miguel Domingo +1
PRHLT Research Center - Universitat Polit`ecnica de Val`encia, Camino de Vera, s/n - Valencia · ValgrAI - Valencian Graduate School and Research Network for Artificial Intelligence, Camino de Vera s/n
In-Image Machine Translation (IIMT) aims to translate scene text in an image and render the translated text back into the original regions while preserving the overall visual appearance. Recent unified multimodal models provide a promising solution by combining visual-text understanding and image generation within a single framework. However, directly adapting such models to IIMT remains challenging. In particular, they often suffer from understanding-generation conflicts, where the translation inferred during understanding is inconsistent with the text supervision used in generation, and spatial position misalignment, where the rendered text does not accurately match the target text regions. To address these issues, we present UniTranslator, a unified multimodal framework for IIMT that tightly couples translation understanding and text editing. Specifically, we introduce an Understand-Generation Alignment Module (UGAM) to bridge the representation gap between understanding and generation, encouraging semantic consistency between translated content prediction and text rendering. We further propose a Spatial Mask Decoder (SMD) with pixel-level supervision over text regions to improve spatial grounding, geometric alignment, and layout controllability during generation. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that UniTranslator achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse language directions and complex real-world layouts. Moreover, our results reveal a strong mutual reinforcement effect between translation understanding and image generation, highlighting the advantage of unified translation multimodal learning. Code is available at https://github.com/SeerRay-Lab/Unitranslator.
Jiahao Lyu, Pei Fu, Zhenhang Li +6
Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Science, China · MiLM Plus, Xiaomi Inc, China · School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Science, China +2