What Topological and Geometric Structure Do Biological Foundation Models Learn? Evidence from 141 Hypotheses

Background: Single-cell foundation models such as Geneformer and scGPT encode rich biological information, but whether this includes causal regulatory logic rather than statistical co-expression remains unclear. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) can resolve superposition in neural networks by decomposing dense activations into interpretable features, yet they have not been systematically applied to biological foundation models. Results: We trained TopK SAEs on residual stream activations from all layers of Geneformer V2-316M (18 layers, d=1152) and scGPT whole-human (12 layers, d=512), producing atlases of 82525 and 24527 features, respectively. Both atlases confirm massive superposition, with 99.8 percent of features invisible to SVD. Systematic characterization reveals rich biological organization: 29 to 59 percent of features annotate to Gene Ontology, KEGG, Reactome, STRING, or TRRUST, with U-shaped layer profiles reflecting hierarchical abstraction. Features organize into co-activation modules (141 in Geneformer, 76 in scGPT), exhibit causal specificity (median 2.36x), and form cross-layer information highways (63 to 99.8 percent). When tested against genome-scale CRISPRi perturbation data, only 3 of 48 transcription factors (6.2 percent) show regulatory-target-specific feature responses. A multi-tissue control yields marginal improvement (10.4 percent, 5 of 48 TFs), establishing model representations as the bottleneck. Conclusions: These models have internalized organized biological knowledge, including pathway membership, protein interactions, functional modules, and hierarchical abstraction, yet they encode minimal causal regulatory logic. We release both feature atlases as interactive web platforms enabling exploration of more than 107000 features across 30 layers of two leading single-cell foundation models.

Single-cell foundation models such as scGPT learn high-dimensional gene representations, but what biological knowledge these representations encode remains unclear. We systematically decode the geometric structure of scGPT internal representations through 63 iterations of automated hypothesis screening (183 hypotheses tested), revealing that the model organizes genes into a structured biological coordinate system rather than an opaque feature space. The dominant spectral axis separates genes by subcellular localization, with secreted proteins at one pole and cytosolic proteins at the other. Intermediate transformer layers transiently encode mitochondrial and ER compartments in a sequence that mirrors the cellular secretory pathway. Orthogonal axes encode protein-protein interaction networks with graded fidelity to experimentally measured interaction strength (Spearman rho = 1.000 across n = 5 STRING confidence quintiles, p = 0.017). In a compact six-dimensional spectral subspace, the model distinguishes transcription factors from their target genes (AUROC = 0.744, all 12 layers significant). Early layers preserve which specific genes regulate which targets, while deeper layers compress this into a coarser regulator versus regulated distinction. Repression edges are geometrically more prominent than activation edges, and B-cell master regulators BATF and BACH2 show convergence toward the B-cell identity anchor PAX5 across transformer depth. Cell-type marker genes cluster with high fidelity (AUROC = 0.851). Residual-stream geometry encodes biological structure complementary to attention patterns. These results indicate that biological transformers learn an interpretable internal model of cellular organization, with implications for regulatory network inference, drug target prioritization, and model auditing.

Motivation: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose foundation model activations into interpretable features, but causal feature-to-feature interactions across network depth remain unknown for biological foundation models. Results: We introduce causal circuit tracing by ablating SAE features and measuring downstream responses, and apply it to Geneformer V2-316M and scGPT whole-human across four conditions (96,892 edges, 80,191 forward passes). Both models show approximately 53 percent biological coherence and 65 to 89 percent inhibitory dominance, invariant to architecture and cell type. scGPT produces stronger effects (mean absolute d = 1.40 vs. 1.05) with more balanced dynamics. Cross-model consensus yields 1,142 conserved domain pairs (10.6x enrichment, p < 0.001). Disease-associated domains are 3.59x more likely to be consensus. Gene-level CRISPRi validation shows 56.4 percent directional accuracy, confirming co-expression rather than causal encoding.