Generative recommendation has recently attracted widespread attention in industry due to its potential for scaling and stronger model capacity. However, deploying real-time generative recommendation in large-scale advertising requires designs beyond large-language-model (LLM)-style training and serving recipes. We present a production-oriented generative recommender co-designed across architecture, learning, and serving, named GR4AD (Generative Recommendation for ADdvertising). As for tokenization, GR4AD proposes UA-SID (Unified Advertisement Semantic ID) to capture complicated business information. Furthermore, GR4AD introduces LazyAR, a lazy autoregressive decoder that relaxes layer-wise dependencies for short, multi-candidate generation, preserving effectiveness while reducing inference cost, which facilitates scaling under fixed serving budgets. To align optimization with business value, GR4AD employs VSL (Value-Aware Supervised Learning) and proposes RSPO (Ranking-Guided Softmax Preference Optimization), a ranking-aware, list-wise reinforcement learning algorithm that optimizes value-based rewards under list-level metrics for continual online updates. For online inference, we further propose dynamic beam serving, which adapts beam width across generation levels and online load to control compute. Large-scale online A/B tests show up to 4.2% ad revenue improvement over an existing DLRM-based stack, with consistent gains from both model scaling and inference-time scaling. GR4AD has been fully deployed in Kuaishou advertising system with over 400 million users and achieves high-throughput real-time serving.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. Overview of our proposed GR4AD: model architecture and learning algorithm.
Figure 2. Illustration of Unified Advertisement Semantic ID.
Figure 3. Comparison of Vanilla AR, DeepSeek MTP, LazyAR.
Figure 4. System overview: training and serving of GR4AD.
Model Settings
Δ Revenue
Δ QPS
vs. Base
vs. GR-Base
Baselines
DLRM (Base)
–
–
OneRec-V2 ( Zhou et al., 2025b ) (GR-Base)
+1.68%
–
Tokenization Optimizations
+ UA-SID
+1.92%
0%
Table 1. Overall performance and ablation of GR4AD.
Figure 5. Scaling laws of model size and beam width.
Tokenization Settings
Offline Metrics
Embedding Optimizations
R@1 ↑
R@5 ↑
R@10 ↑
QARM ( Luo et al., 2025 )
0.541
0.812
0.893
Qwen3-VL-7B ( Bai et al., 2025 )
0.769
0.948
0.977
Qwen3-VL-7B + IT + CL (UAE)
0.896
0.985
0.994
Quantization Optimizations
Cpr ↓
Col ↓
Util ↑
RQ-Kmeans ( Luo et al., 2025 ; Zhou et al., 2025a )