cs.CLFeb 26, 2026

CiteAudit: You Cited It, But Did You Read It? A Benchmark for Verifying Scientific References in the LLM Era

Authors: Kaiwen Shi, Weixiang Sun, Zheyuan Zhang, Lichao Sun, Nitesh V. Chawla, Yanfang Ye

Organizations: University of Notre Dame · Lehigh University

Abstract

Scientific research relies on citation integrity, yet large language models (LLMs) have introduced a critical risk: fabricated references that appear plausible but correspond to no real publications. As manual verification becomes infeasible and existing automated tools remain fragile, we introduce CiteAudit, a comprehensive benchmark and detection framework for hallucinated citations. We design a multi-agent verification pipeline that decomposes citation checking into metadata extraction, memory lookup, web-based retrieval, and final judgment. To evaluate this, we construct a large-scale, human-validated dataset spanning diverse domains and hallucination types. Experiments demonstrate that our framework achieves superior verification performance over state-of-the-art LLMs and commercial baselines. Our work provides the necessary infrastructure to audit citations at scale and safeguard the trustworthiness of scholarly discourse. Code is available at https://github.com/shiiiikw/CiteAudit.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. CiteCheck: Retrieval-Grounded Detection of LLM Citation Hallucinations in Scientific Text

    May 26, 2026Khashayar Khajavi, Shaghayegh Sadeghi, Rise Adhikari +1Citation VerificationAutomated Fact-Checking

  2. Source or It Didn't Happen: A Multi-Agent Framework for Citation Hallucination Detection

    May 9, 2026Mingzhe Li, Zhiqiang Lin, Shiqing MaHallucination in Language ModelsCitation Verification

  3. Phantom References: Hallucinated Citations That Survive Peer Review at Top-Tier Conferences

    Jul 1, 2026Mark Russinovich, Ram Shankar Siva Kumar, Ahmed SalemHallucination in Language ModelsCitation Verification