Multiview Progress Prediction of Robot Activities

Occluded tasks remain a bottleneck in robot manipulation. Existing solutions either deploy additional physical cameras requiring training-inference camera parity, or rely on explicit 3D reconstruction with high computational cost. Moreover, both approaches rely on standard agent-view and wrist-view observations, while failing to capture occlusion information and future scene evolution. To this end, we propose UniviewVLA, a unified multiview Vision-Language-Action model with world modeling, which infers multiview scene evolution for action prediction from only standard two-camera observations. We demonstrate that by leveraging generated multiview future views from the world model, UniviewVLA reveals occluded cues and models future scene evolution, improving action prediction and removing the need for extra hardware or explicit reconstruction. Besides, to accelerate inference while preserving prediction accuracy, UniviewVLA develops Motion-Informative Token Compression, which compresses each generated view from 625 to 16 tokens and reduces per-view latency from 6-7s to 0.2-0.3s. UniviewVLA also proposes training-free Action-Entropy View Selection, which dynamically identifies the most action-informative view at different inference stages. Extensive experiments show that UniviewVLA achieves 95.8% on LIBERO and 4.60 on CALVIN ABCD to D, both standard occlusion-free benchmarks. On customized occlusion-focused tasks, it improves success rate from 40.0% to 73.3%, and average real-robot success rate by 33.4 points, demonstrating stronger occlusion-focused performance without sacrificing standard occlusion-free benchmarks.

Measurement of task progress through explicit, actionable milestones is critical for robust robotic manipulation. This progress awareness enables a model to ground its current task status, anticipate verifiable intermediate states, and detect and recover from failures when progress stalls. To embody this capability, we introduce See, Plan, Rewind (SPR), a progress-aware vision-language-action framework that dynamically grounds language instructions into a sequence of spatial subgoals. SPR operates through a continuous core cycle, Seeing the current state and upcoming milestone, Planning a trajectory towards the next 2D waypoint, and Rewinding to a recoverable state upon failure by monitoring progress against the expected sequence. This closed-loop approach enables robust error correction without requiring additional training data or auxiliary models. Extensive experiments demonstrate the framework's effectiveness, generalization and robustness: SPR outperforms the MolmoAct baseline by 5% on the LIBERO benchmark. On the challenging LIBERO-Plus benchmark with unseen instructions and initial states, SPR achieves state-of-the-art robustness with the smallest performance drop, surpassing OpenVLA-OFT and UniVLA, demonstrating superior out-of-distribution robustness.

Robotic learning takes place in dynamic environments with large behavior spaces. A terminal success signal only tells the robot whether the task is completed. It does not explain whether the current behavior is making progress, remaining unchanged, or undoing earlier progress. For this reason, recent studies have increasingly explored progress rewards that provide feedback during task execution. However, the current literature lacks a shared framework. Existing methods use different observations, goal specifications, output signals, supervision sources, and evaluation protocols. This makes it difficult to compare them and understand what their results actually validate. In this survey, we provide a unified view of progress reward modeling for robotic learning. We organize the field in three connected steps. We first study the interface of a progress model. This defines the problem from the outside by asking what information the model receives and what form of progress signal it produces. We then move inside the model and study the methods used to construct this signal. This reveals the different assumptions and mechanisms behind progress estimation and reward generation. Finally, we examine the data and benchmarks that support these methods. This shows how progress supervision is obtained and what different evaluations actually measure. Together, these three perspectives connect what a progress model is, how it is built, and how its quality is validated. We further summarize the main limitations of current approaches and discuss future research directions.