ReMoT: Reinforcement Learning with Motion Contrast Triplets

Spatiotemporal intelligence in autonomous driving (AD) requires an agent to integrate multi-view observations into a coherent scene representation, maintain object continuity across viewpoints and time, and reason about spatial relations, interactions, and future dynamics. However, existing AD vision-language benchmarks largely focus on single-view, static, ego-centric, or single-source question answering, leaving it unclear whether current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can truly construct and reason over dynamic driving scenes. We introduce DriveSpatial, a benchmark of 15.6K human-verified QA pairs across 20 tasks from five large-scale AD datasets. DriveSpatial evaluates four abilities: Cognitive Scene Construction, Multi-view Relational Understanding, Temporal Reasoning, and Generalization. Unlike prior benchmarks, DriveSpatial is generated from a dynamic multi-relational scene graph that encodes object states, spatial relations, interactions, camera visibility, and temporal correspondences, enabling QA pairs that enforce genuine cross-view and spatiotemporal reasoning. Evaluating 15 representative VLMs reveals a substantial human-model gap: the strongest model trails humans by 28.4 points, with Cognitive Scene Construction emerging as the key bottleneck. Further diagnostics show that language-only prompting is insufficient, while explicit BEV grounding consistently improves performance. These results suggest that current VLMs lack the scene-construction ability needed for reliable spatiotemporal driving intelligence. DriveSpatial and its construction pipeline will be released to support future research.

Recent video reasoning models increasingly produce spatio-temporal evidence chains that localize objects at specific timestamps. While these traces improve interpretability by grounding where and when evidence appears, they often leave the motion connecting observations, the how, implicit. This makes dynamic and trajectory-dependent claims difficult to supervise, verify, or penalize when unsupported by the video. We formalize this missing component as Spatial-Temporal-Trajectory (STT) reasoning and introduce Motion-o, a motion-centric extension to vision-language models (VLMs) that makes trajectories explicit and verifiable. Motion-o augments evidence chains with Motion Chain of Thought (MCoT), a structured pathway that represents object motion through a discrete <motion/> tag summarizing direction, speed, and scale change. To supervise MCoT, we densify sparse spatio-temporal annotations into object tracks and derive motion descriptors from centroid displacement and box-area change. We then train with complementary rewards for trajectory consistency and visual grounding, including a perturbation-based signal that penalizes motion descriptions that remain unchanged when temporal evidence is removed. Across multiple video understanding benchmarks, Motion-o consistently improves trajectory-faithful reasoning without architectural modifications. These results suggest that an explicit motion interface can complement existing VLM pipelines by converting implicit dynamics into verifiable evidence. Code is available at~\faGithub\ ostadabbas/Motion-o.

Video large language models (Video LLMs) can achieve strong video-QA accuracy without reliably tracking spatiotemporal dynamics. A model may answer a motion question from static cues, for example, and give the same prediction even after the underlying motion is reversed. Correctness-based reinforcement learning does not directly address this problem because it rewards the final answer without requiring the policy to respond to task-relevant video dynamics. We propose Counterfactual Relational Policy Optimization (CRPO), which explicitly trains Video LLMs to respond to controlled changes in the visual input. For each training example, CRPO constructs a counterfactual video, such as a horizontally flipped or temporally reversed version of the original, and jointly optimizes rollouts from both videos under a shared policy. Factual supervision anchors what the model should answer, while counterfactual supervision constrains when that answer should change: predictions should change when an intervention alters task-relevant dynamics and remain stable when the queried property is preserved. This coupling provides a direct behavioral learning signal without requiring ground-truth labels for transformed videos or annotated spatiotemporal reasoning traces, while discouraging indiscriminate answer changes. To evaluate this property, we introduce DyBench, a paired counterfactual benchmark with 3{,}014 videos and a strict pair-accuracy metric. Across paired spatiotemporal evaluations and standard video benchmarks, CRPO improves sensitivity to motion and temporal changes while improving performance on general video understanding. The gains also extend to segment reordering, a transformation never used during training, suggesting that CRPO learns sensitivity to video dynamics beyond the training interventions. The project website can be found at https://ddz16.github.io/crpo.github.io/ .