Data-Centric Benchmark for Label Noise Estimation and Ranking in Remote Sensing Binary Building Segmentation
Authors: Keiller Nogueira, Codrut-Andrei Diaconu, Dávid Kerekes, Jakob Gawlikowski, Cédric Léonard, Nassim Ait Ali Braham, June Moh Goo, Zichao Zeng, Zhipeng Liu, Pallavi Jain, Andrea Nascetti, Ronny Hänsch
Organizations: School of Computer Science and Informatics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK · German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote Sensing Technology Institute, Wessling, 82234, Germany · Division of Geoinformatics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 114 28, Sweden · University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK · University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QJ, UK · Inria, Montpellier, 34000, France, Paris, 75013, France · German Aerospace Center (DLR), Microwaves and Radar Institute, Wessling, 82234, Germany
High-quality pixel-level annotations are essential for the semantic segmentation of remote sensing imagery. However, such labels are expensive to obtain and often affected by noise due to the labor-intensive and time-consuming nature of pixel-wise annotation, which makes it challenging for human annotators to label every pixel accurately. Annotation errors can significantly degrade the performance and robustness of modern segmentation models, motivating the need for reliable mechanisms to identify and quantify noisy training samples. This paper introduces a novel data-centric benchmark, together with a new, publicly available binary building segmentation dataset. This specific task serves as a representative and practically relevant testbed that enables controlled experimentation with different annotation perturbations. Furthermore, we also introduce two techniques for identifying, quantifying, and ranking training samples according to their level of label noise in remote sensing semantic segmentation. Such proposed methods leverage complementary strategies based on model uncertainty, prediction consistency, and representation analysis, and consistently outperform established baselines across a range of experimental settings. The outcomes of this work are publicly available at https://github.com/keillernogueira/label_noise_segmentation.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the proposed benchmark. A well-curated, clean dataset is first partitioned into training and validation/test sets. A noise injection algorithm is then applied to the training set to artificially introduce label noise. By comparing the noisy and clean annotations, a ground-truth ranking of training samples is generated based on pixel-wise Intersection-over-Union (IoU). The resulting noisy training set can be subsequently processed by a noise estimation method, which assigns each image a relative label-noise score, enabling a ranking from least to most affected by annotation errors. The predicted ranking can be evaluated against the ground-truth ranking using ranking-based metrics, such as Kendall’s τ [ 6 ] . Finally, the estimated ranking can also be used to prioritize or select higher-quality samples under different data selection criteria or annotation budgets, enabling more robust model training and improved generalization, which may be assessed on the original clean validation/test sets.
Figure 2: Samples from the SpaceNet8 dataset [ 7 ] . The first row shows the RGB image; the second row presents the reference segmentation masks; and the third row shows the segmentation masks corrupted with synthetic noise. Each column shows a different type of noise. White pixels represent the building class whereas black pixels are the background.
Method
Kendall’s τ
Spearman’s
Random (lower bound)
0.0015
0.0021
CleanLab [ 16 ]
0.1717
0.2383
Uncertainty Quantification [ 1 , 32 ]
0.1262
0.1383
Augmented Ensemble Ranking
0.6104
0.7709
Regularized Variance Ranking
0.5683
0.7312
Table 1: Results with respect to the produced rankings.
Method
25%
50%
75%
100%
Random (lower bound)
72.31
75.25
75.29
-
CleanLab [ 16 ]
74.51
77.39
77.78
-
Uncertainty Quantification [ 1 , 32 ]
75.35
77.30
77.85
-
Augmented Ensemble Ranking
79.62
80.34
79.02
-
Regularized Variance Ranking
78.93
79.56
79.09
-
Noisy Labels (oracle)
80.27
80.98
80.10
78.26
Table 2: Results (% F1-score) of the U-Net model [ 30 ] trained on subsets of varying sizes (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%).
Method
25%
50%
75%
100%
Random (lower bound)
73.49
74.64
75.90
-
CleanLab [ 16 ]
74.62
76.35
78.77
-
Uncertainty Quantification [ 1 , 32 ]
74.35
76.20
78.39
-
Augmented Ensemble Ranking
79.47
79.37
78.23
-
Regularized Variance Ranking
78.52
79.39
78.74
-
Noisy Labels (oracle)
79.81
79.66
79.97
78.32
Table 3: Results (% F1-score) of the SegFormer model [ 39 ] trained on subsets of varying sizes (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%).
Figure 3: Comparison, in terms of Kendall’s τ , between the reference ranking, the average rank position assigned to each sample across the two proposed approaches, and the employed baselines
Label noise in the sense of incorrect labels is present in many real-world data sets and is known to severely limit the generalizability of deep learning models. In the field of remote sensing, however, automated treatment of label noise in data sets has received little attention to date. In particular, there is a lack of systematic analysis of the performance of data-centric methods that not only cope with label noise but also explicitly identify and isolate noisy labels. In this paper, we examine three such methods and evaluate their behavior under different label noise assumptions. To do this, we inject different types of label noise with noise levels ranging from 10 to 70% into two benchmark data sets, followed by an analysis of how well the selected methods filter the label noise and how this affects task performances. With our analyses, we clearly prove the value of data-centric methods for both parts - label noise identification and task performance improvements. Our analyses provide insights into which method is the best choice depending on the setting and objective. Finally, we show in which areas there is still a need for research in the transfer of data-centric label noise methods to remote sensing data. As such, our work is a step forward in bridging the methodological establishment of data-centric label noise methods and their usage in practical settings in the remote sensing domain.
Felix Kröber, Genc Hoxha, Ribana Roscher
Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Leo-Brandt-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany · Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, Germany
Open-vocabulary remote sensing image segmentation (OVRSIS) aims to segment text-specified categories beyond a fixed label space. Its key challenge is to maintain reliable pixel--text correspondence under substantial appearance variation in remote-sensing imagery. Existing methods often rely on specialized vision--language representations or complex adaptation mechanisms, yet still perform deterministic matching between fixed text prototypes and individual visual features. We instead formulate OVRSIS as a distributional pixel--text alignment problem and propose Pi-Seg, a lightweight perturbation-based framework. Pi-Seg introduces learnable variations into textual prototypes and dense visual features before alignment. Segmentation supervision encourages perturbations that enlarge the target-to-distractor margin while suppressing harmful feature shifts. Pi-Seg consistently improves performance under the existing single-source OVRSISBench protocols. To evaluate OVRSIS beyond source-specific training settings, we further introduce a unified multi-source protocol and construct GlobalRSOV95K, containing approximately 95K densely annotated images and 35 semantic categories. Models are trained on this shared dataset and evaluated on an image-disjoint suite of 10 downstream datasets. The complete benchmark covers more than 170K images and 122 categories. Experiments under both single-source and multi-source protocols show that Pi-Seg improves cross-dataset transfer and generalizes effectively to practical geospatial segmentation tasks, while GlobalRSOV95K provides a common foundation for transferable OVRSIS research. \footnote{https://github.com/LiBingyu01/Pi-Seg}
Bingyu Li, Tao Huo, Haocheng Dong +4
Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, China · Institute of Artificial Intelligence (TeleAI), China Telecom, P. R. China · School of Artificial Intelligence, OPtics and ElectroNics (iOPEN), Northwestern Polytechnical University, China
Supervised learning for image segmentation typically requires spatially aligned image and label sets. When images and labels originate from different sources, the pairing may be misaligned, which can significantly deteriorate the performance of the learned models. This is especially common in remote sensing, when aerial or satellite images are co-registered with labels from another source (e.g., OpenStreetMap). In this work, we propose a novel approach for training on misaligned labels, where we simultaneously learn the label alignment. Our align and segment (AnS) approach builds on the spatial transformer module to transform the misaligned labels using an affine transformation to provide a better learning target for a canonical semantic segmentation network. We prevent shortcut learning of misaligned labels in these semantic segmentation networks through a self-supervised regularization loss and show that it is complementary to data augmentation, especially for systematically misaligned training data. A decisive characteristic of our AnS approach is that it learns without requiring any golden labels. We experimentally show on both synthetic and real-world data from different cities that our approach enables high-quality building segmentation and precise label-image alignment at the same time. Code and derived datasets are available at https://github.com/venkanna37/align-and-segment