Foundation Models in Remote Sensing: Evolving from Unimodality to Multimodality
Organizations: School of Automation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China · School of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China · Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China · School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China ·
Abstract
Remote sensing (RS) techniques are increasingly crucial for deepening our understanding of the planet. As the volume and diversity of RS data continue to grow exponentially, there is an urgent need for advanced data modeling and understanding capabilities to manage and interpret these vast datasets effectively. Foundation models present significant new growth opportunities and immense potential to revolutionize the RS field. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive technical survey on foundation models in RS, offering a brand-new perspective by exploring their evolution from unimodality to multimodality. We hope this work serves as a valuable entry point for researchers interested in both foundation models and RS and helps them launch new projects or explore new research topics in this rapidly evolving area. This survey addresses the following three key questions: What are foundation models in RS? Why are foundation models needed in RS? How can we effectively guide junior researchers in gaining a comprehensive and practical understanding of foundation models in RS applications? More specifically, we begin by outlining the background and motivation, emphasizing the importance of foundation models in RS. We then review existing foundation models in RS, systematically categorizing them into unimodal and multimodal approaches. Additionally, we provide a tutorial-like section to guide researchers, especially beginners, on how to train foundation models in RS and apply them to real-world tasks. The survey aims to equip researchers in RS with a deeper and more efficient understanding of foundation models, enabling them to get started easily and effectively apply these models across various RS applications.
Figures & tables
| Title | Year | Journal | Description | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain-Inspired Remote Sensing Foundation Models and Open Problems: A Comprehensive Survey | 2023 | IEEE JSTARS | This review examines brain-inspired foundational models in RS, highlighting their applications, challenges, and advantages in complex tasks. | [ 7 ] |
| On the Promises and Challenges of Multimodal Foundation Models for Geographical, Environmental, Agricultural, and Urban Planning Applications | 2023 | Arxiv | This review highlights the potential, challenges, and flexibility of multimodal foundation models in geography, environment, agriculture, and urban planning through case studies. | [ 8 ] |
| Vision-Language Models in Remote Sensing: Current Progress and Future Trends | 2024 | IEEE GRSM | This review explores vision-language models in RS, highlighting their progress, applications, and future trends. | [ 9 ] |
| On the Foundations of Earth and Climate Foundation Models | 2024 | Arxiv | This review explores the theory behind Earth and climate models, proposing a foundational framework for Earth and climate sciences. | [ 10 ] |
| Towards Vision-Language Geo-Foundation Model: A Survey | 2024 | Arxiv | This review introduces geographic vision-language models, emphasizing geospatial priors and their multimodal fusion capabilities in geographic information processing. | [ 11 ] |
| AI Foundation Models in Remote Sensing: A Survey | 2024 | Arxiv | This review summarizes AI foundational models in RS, analyzing their applications and challenges across different tasks. | [ 12 ] |
| Name | Domain | Modality | Resolution | Image Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeCo | General Scenes | Spectral | 10 m | About 1 million |
| SSL4EO-S12 | Land Cover | Spectral, SAR | 10–60 m | 1,004,316 |
| fMoW | Classification | RGB, Spectral | 0.3–10 m | 1,047,691 |
| MillionAID | Classification | RGB | 0.5–11.4 m | 400,695 |
| SSL4EO-L | General Scenes | Spectral | 30 m | 5 million |
| Satlas | OD, CD, Class, SemSeg | RGB, spectral | 1–10 m | 856K |
| Modality | Models | Publications | Architectures | Downstreams | Codes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGB | Matter [ 25 ] | CVPR’23 | CL | SC, SS, CD | https://github.com/periakiva/MATTER |
| Scale-MAE [ 31 ] | ICCV’23 | MAE | SC, SS | https://github.com/bair-climate-initiative/scale-mae | |
| RVSA [ 26 ] | TGRS’22 | MIM | SC, SS, OD | https://github.com/ViTAE-Transformer/Remote-Sensing-RVSA | |
| CMID [ 28 ] | TGRS’23 | CL&MIM | SC, CD, OD | https://github.com/NJU-LHRS/official-CMID | |
| GFM [ 30 ] | ICCV’23 | MIM | SC, SS, CD, SR | https://github.com/mmendiet/GFM | |
| Cross-Scale MAE [ 39 ] | NeurIPS’23 | MAE | SC, SS | https://github.com/aicip/Cross-Scale-MAE |
| Modality | Model | BurnSr | MADOS | PASTIS | Sen1Fl11 | FBP | DEN | CTM-SS | SN7 | AI4Farms | Xview2 | BioMassters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wildfire | Marine | Agriculture | Flood | Land | Land | Agriculture | CD | Agriculture | CD | Regression | ||
| Unimodal | SatlasNet | 79.96 | 55.86 | 17.51 | 90.30 | 50.97 | 36.31 | 46.97 | 61.88 | 25.13 | 52.23 | 41.67 |
| Prithvi 1.0 | 83.62 | 49.98 | 33.93 | 90.37 | 46.81 | 27.86 | 43.07 | 56.54 | 26.86 | 49.35 | 39.99 | |
| SpectralGPT | 80.47 | 57.99 | 35.44 | 89.07 | 33.42 | 37.85 | 46.95 | 58.86 | 26.75 | 48.40 | 36.11 | |
| S.-S12-MoCo | 81.58 | 51.76 | 34.49 | 89.26 | 53.02 | 35.44 | 48.58 | 57.64 | 25.38 | 51.59 | 40.21 | |
| S.-S12-DINO | 81.72 | 49.37 | 36.18 | 88.61 | 51.15 | 34.81 | 48.66 | 56.47 | 25.62 | 50.56 | 41.23 |
| Modality | Models | Publications | Architectures | Downstreams | Codes |
| Time-series | SeCo [ 63 ] | ICCV’21 | CL | SC, CD | https://github.com/ServiceNow/seasonal-contrast |
| CaCo [ 64 ] | CVPR’23 | CL | SC,SS, CD | https://github.com/utkarshmall13/CACo | |
| RingMo-Sense [ 65 ] | TGRS’23 | MAE | OD,VP,OT | https://github.com/ | |
| U-BARN [ 66 ] | JSTARS’24 | MAE | SS | https://src.koda.cnrs.fr/iris.dumeur/ssl_ubarn | |
| Prithvi2.0 [ 68 ] | Arxiv’24 | MAE | SC, SS, VP, GM | https://github.com/NASA-IMPACT/Prithvi-EO-2.0 | |
| Geo-Vision | GASSL [ 70 ] | ICCV’21 | CL | SC, SS, OD | https://github.com/sustainlab-group/geography-aware-ssl |
| Model | Architecture | Params (M) | FLOPs (G) | Inference Memory (GB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ResNet-50 | ResNet-50 | 25.6 | 4.1 | 1–2 |
| ViT-Base | ViT-B/16 | 86.0 | 17.6 | 2–4 |
| ViT-Large | ViT-L/16 | 304.0 | 61.6 | 4–8 |
| ViT-Huge | ViT-H/14 | 632.0 | 190.7 | 8–12 |
| SAM-B | ViT-B/16 (SAM) | 91.0 | 22.0 | 2–4 |
| SAM-L | ViT-L/16 (SAM) | 308.0 | 62.0 | 4–8 |
| Model | FLOPs (G) | Trainable Params (M) | Total Params (M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CROMA | 278.46 | 46.95 | 350.0 |
| DOFA | 130.04 | 39.35 | 150.9 |
| GFM-Swin | 38.10 | 33.71 | 120.4 |
| Prithvi | 129.70 | 39.34 | 125.7 |
| RemoteCLIP | 35.14 | 39.35 | 16.8 |
| SatlasNet | 33.40 | 33.25 | 121.2 |
| CNNs: | convolutional neural networks |
| CROMA: | contrastive radar-optical masked autoencoders |
| CSPT: | consecutive pretraining |
| CWSAM: | class-wise SAM |
| DOFA: | dynamic one for all |
| EO: | Earth observation |
| FG-MAE: | feature guided masked autoencoders |
Geospatial Foundation Models
Geospatial foundation models turn satellite, map, and Earth-system data into reusable representations for spatial analysis and prediction.
See all 123 papers