DeAR: Fine-Grained VLM Adaptation by Decomposing Attention Head Roles

Fine-tuning has become the dominant paradigm for adapting Vision-Language Models (VLMs), yet most approaches rely on explicit weight updates that introduce a fundamental trade-off. Full Fine-Tuning (FFT) may perturb pretrained representations due to cross-modal gradient interference, whereas Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods rely on additive modules, such as low-rank adapters, which may limit adaptation capacity. In this paper, we rethink VLM adaptation from a structural selection framework that adapts VLMs without modifying backbone weights, and we propose Mask Fine-Tuning (MFT). MFT learns masks that selectively route information through existing pretrained connections, dynamically uncovering subnetworks that better align pretrained representations with downstream objectives. Extensive experiments show that MFT provides an effective structural alternative to both FFT and PEFT, consistently achieving superior performance across multiple vision-language benchmarks without adding knowledge or altering the deployment architecture. Moreover, our analysis with MFT provides new insights into how pretrained VLMs reorganize their internal representational pathways during adaptation.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs), such as CLIP, have achieved significant zero-shot performance on downstream tasks with various fine-tuning adaptation methods. However, recent studies have proven that adversarial attacks can significantly degrade the inference ability of VLMs, posing substantial risks to their practical applications. Prevalent test-time adaptation methods typically rely on multi-view augmentation to implement various fine-tuning strategies, which struggle to identify semantic information and are prone to destroying discriminative regions in fine-grained scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose Attention-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning (A-TPT), a semantics-preserving method designed for test-time adaptation. We first refine the gradient attention rollout mechanism to identify semantically meaningful regions surviving under adversarial attacks. Furthermore, we leverage them to guide the spatially varying augmentation intensities and multi-view ensemble for prompt tuning and inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate that A-TPT outperforms existing test-time adaptation methods on both adversarial and clean data. Codes are available at https://github.com/SEU-VIPGroup/A-TPT .

Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot capabilities yet remain sensitive to real-world distribution shifts during inference. Although significant efforts are devoted to adapting VLMs at test time, they rely heavily on noisy pseudo-labels predicted directly from raw embedding similarities during inference, which are unreliable under distribution shift and mislead the adaptation. To avoid noise amplification, existing works craft coarse-grained surrogate objectives during adaptation, which fail to explicitly model sample-level relationships across different modalities, creating objective mismatch with inference, thus leading to marginal performance improvement. In this work, we aim to bridge the detached objectives of inference and adaptation for VLMs, and propose a principled VLM TTA method called \algname. For VLM inference, we formulate the zero-shot image classification task as a cross-modal alignment problem encoded via a Wasserstein OT formulation, providing robust pseudo-labels at the sample-level to effectively adapt VLMs. For VLM adaptation, we adopt a soft-label InfoNCE loss to adapt VLMs based on the OT-induced pseudo-labels, leveraging fine-grained supervisions to explicitly model relationships of individual image-text pairs via contrastive learning, which empowers accurate inference at the same granularity. Moreover, we theoretically reveal that the InfoNCE loss can be neatly reformulated as a Wasserstein OT formulation, thereby unifying the objectives of the inference and adaptation of VLMs to achieve their mutual benefits. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our methods, outperforming the best-performing methods by up to 7% with state-of-the-art efficiency.