Organizations: University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA · Dell Children’s Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA · University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA · University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA
Accurate classification of pediatric central nervous system tumors remains challenging due to histological complexity and limited training data. While pathology foundation models have advanced whole-slide image (WSI) analysis, they often fail to leverage the rich, complementary information found in clinical text and tissue microarchitecture. To this end, we propose PathMoE, an interpretable multimodal framework that integrates H&E slides, pathology reports, and nuclei-level cell graphs via an interaction-aware mixture-of-experts architecture built on state-of-the-art foundation models for each modality. By training specialized experts to capture modality uniqueness, redundancy, and synergy, PathMoE employs an input-dependent gating mechanism that dynamically weights these interactions, providing sample-level interpretability. We evaluate our framework on two dataset-specific classification tasks on an internal pediatric brain tumor dataset (PBT) and external TCGA datasets. PathMoE improves macro-F1 from 0.762 to 0.799 (+0.037) on PBT when integrating WSI, text, and graph modalities; on TCGA, augmenting WSI with graph knowledge improves macro-F1 from 0.668 to 0.709 (+0.041). These results demonstrate significant performance gains over state-of-the-art image-only baselines while revealing the specific modality interactions driving individual predictions. This interpretability is particularly critical for rare tumor subtypes, where transparent model reasoning is essential for clinical trust and diagnostic validation.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of PathMoE . H&E WSIs, pathology reports, and nuclei graphs are encoded and fused via an interaction-aware mixture-of-experts module. An input-dependent gating network computes sample-specific weights to combine expert predictions into the final tumor classification. A vanilla fusion method is also depicted.
High cell density and hemorrhage mimic HGs; lacks nuclear atypia/mitoses and shows pituitary morphology.
Case_3
NGT
LG-CNS
NGT
0.211
0.176
0.210
Mesenchymal non-glial tumor with spindled architecture; overlaps with low-grade gliomas but distinguishable by growth pattern.
Case_4
LG-CNS
HG-CNS
LG-CNS
0.233
0.181
0.144
Low-grade glioneuronal tumor with calcifications and mild nuclear density increase; lacks atypia, mitoses, or necrosis of high-grade tumors.
Table 3: Qualitative error analysis of the baseline and PathMoE (PM) across image–text (WT) and image–text–graph (WTG) settings. Each case shows the ground-truth label, model predictions, modality interaction weights ( wW , wT , wG ), and a brief clinical rationale for the correct diagnosis. Nodes and edges (light blue) often aggregate in regions of cellular density learned by the GNN.
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA · University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA · Dell Children’s Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA +2
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA · University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA · Microsoft Health AI, Redmond, Washington 98052-6399, USA
Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, China · Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China · Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China +1