On Geometry Regularization in Autoencoder Reduced-Order Models with Latent Neural ODE Dynamics
Organizations: Independent Researcher, Italy
Abstract
We investigate geometric regularization strategies for learned latent representations in encoder--decoder reduced-order models. In a fixed experimental setting for the advection--diffusion--reaction (ADR) equation, we model latent dynamics using a neural ODE and evaluate four regularization approaches applied during autoencoder pre-training: (a) near-isometry regularization of the decoder Jacobian, (b) a stochastic decoder gain penalty based on random directional gains, (c) a second-order directional curvature penalty, and (d) Stiefel projection of the first decoder layer. Across multiple seeds, we find that (a)--(c) often produce latent representations that make subsequent latent-dynamics training with a frozen autoencoder more difficult, especially for long-horizon rollouts, even when they improve local decoder smoothness or related sensitivity proxies. In contrast, (d) consistently improves conditioning-related diagnostics of the learned latent dynamics and tends to yield better rollout performance. We discuss the hypothesis that, in this setting, the downstream impact of latent-geometry mismatch outweighs the benefits of improved decoder smoothness.
Figures & tables
| Method | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stiefel projection | 13.5 | 1.6 | ||
| Vanilla baseline | 14.1 | 1.4 | ||
| Curvature penalty | 14.5 | 1.2 | ||
| Gain penalty | 18.1 | 2.5 | ||
| Isometry penalty | 19.3 | 3.4 |
| Method | (A) Paired | (B) Paired |
|---|---|---|
| Stiefel projection | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Curvature penalty | -0.028 | -0.024 |
| Gain penalty | -0.035 | -0.028 |
| Isometry penalty | -0.036 | -0.028 |
| Method | Dyn. conditioning | Decoder gain | Latent error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stiefel projection | 124.2 | 4.428 | 0.988 |
| Vanilla | 145.3 | 3.380 | 1.156 |
| Curvature penalty | 316.6 | 1.570 | 3.434 |
| Isometry penalty | 407.2 | 1.000 | 4.066 |
| Gain penalty | 424.3 | 1.017 | 4.217 |
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Method | Std | 95% CI | -value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stiefel projection | 0.009 | 0.019 | 0.010 | 0.058 |
| Isometry penalty | -0.012 | 0.020 | 0.010 | 0.988 |
| Gain penalty | -0.014 | 0.018 | 0.010 | 0.997 |
| Curvature penalty | -0.016 | 0.020 | 0.011 | 0.997 |
| Method | Std | 95% CI | -value | |
| Stiefel projection | 0.005 | 0.012 | 0.006 | 0.080 |
Reduced-Order Modeling
Reduced-order modeling builds compact approximations of complex systems to make simulation, prediction, and control more efficient.
See all 88 papers