Conversational Demand Response: Bidirectional Aggregator-Prosumer Coordination through Agentic AI
Organizations: Energy Economics Group, TU Wien, Gußhausstraße 25–29, Vienna, Austria · Industrial Economics and Technology Management, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
Abstract
Residential demand response depends on sustained prosumer participation, yet existing coordination is either fully automated, or limited to one-way dispatch signals and price alerts that offer little possibility for informed decision-making. This paper introduces Conversational Demand Response (CDR), a coordination mechanism where aggregators and prosumers interact through bidirectional natural language, enabled through agentic AI. A two-tier multi-agent architecture is developed in which an aggregator agent dispatches flexibility requests and a prosumer Home Energy Management System (HEMS) assesses deliverability and cost-benefit by calling an optimization-based tool. CDR also enables prosumer-initiated upstream communication, where changes in preferences can reach the aggregator directly. Proof-of-concept evaluation shows that interactions complete in under 12 seconds. The architecture illustrates how agentic AI can bridge the aggregator-prosumer coordination gap, providing the scalability of automated DR while preserving the transparency, explainability, and user agency necessary for sustained prosumer participation. All system components, including agent prompts, orchestration logic, and simulation interfaces, are released as open source to enable reproducibility and further development.
Figures & tables
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| Real-time Coordination | Aggregator adapts requests to prosumer context rather than issuing static commands |
| Portfolio Planning | Aggregator communicates upcoming events, enabling prosumers to plan ahead |
| Performance Feedback | Prosumers receive quantified impact of past participation, reinforcing engagement |
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| Transparent Participation | Prosumers see the full impact and compensation in plain language before committing |
| Explainable Compensation | Rewards are explained per load and linked to market conditions |
| Adaptive Preference Setting | Prosumers can update constraints and preferences at any time, not only at enrollment |
| Direction | Scenario | Iterations | Tool calls | Tokens (k) | Time (s) |
| Downstream | Acceptance | 3.6 0.5 | 2.6 0.5 | 23.4 4.0 | 8.3 2.1 |
| Rejection | 5.0 0.7 | 3.6 0.5 | 34.2 6.0 | 9.8 1.9 | |
| High-target | 3.4 0.5 | 2.4 0.5 | 21.8 4.1 | 7.8 2.2 | |
| Upstream | Availability | 1 | 0 | 1.3 0.0 | 1.3 0.8 |
| Preference | 1 | 0 | 1.0 0.0 | 1.7 1.6 | |
| New Asset | 1 | 0 | 1.6 0.1 | 1.3 1.2 |
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Battery | |
| Capacity | 15 kWh |
| Charge/discharge rate | 8 kW |
| Round-trip efficiency | 92% |
| SoC bounds | 20–90% |
| Initial SoC | 30% (4.5 kWh) |
Demand Response
Demand response shifts or reduces electricity use to help balance the grid while accounting for prices, incentives, comfort, and service needs.
See all 23 papers