Organizations: Signal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, USA · Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California
Accent plays a crucial role in speaker identity and inclusivity in speech technologies. Existing accented text-to-speech (TTS) systems either require large-scale accented datasets or lack fine-grained phoneme-level controllability. We propose a accented TTS framework that combines phonological rules with a multilingual TTS model. The rules are applied to phoneme sequences to transform accent at the phoneme level while preserving intelligibility. The method requires no accented training data and enables explicit phoneme-level accent manipulation. We design rule sets for Spanish- and Indian-accented English, modeling systematic differences in consonants, vowels, and syllable structure arising from phonotactic constraints. We analyze the trade-off between phoneme-level duration alignment and accent as realized in speech timing. Experimental results demonstrate effective accent shift while maintaining speech quality.
Figures & tables
Spanish Rule
US IPA
Spanish IPA
1. Initial Consonant Substitution
\textipa /v \texttheta \textipa ð \textipa z \textdyoghlig /
\textipa /b s d s j/
2. Spanish Rhoticity
\textipa /r/
\textipa /r R/
3. Epenthesis (s-clusters)
\textipa /sp st sk/
\textipa /esp est esk/
4. Final Consonant Devoicing
\textipa /b d g z \textdyoghlig /
\textipa /p t k s \textteshlig /
5. Vowel Simplification
\textipa /I U @ A 2 E 3 O/
\textipa /i u a a a e e o a/
6. Monophthongization and Schwa
\textipa /eI oU @/
\textipa /e o a/
Table 1: Phonological transformation rules that demonstrates shifts from US English to Spanish- and Indic-accented English.
IPA
Examples
Rules
This very tall teacher closed the big park
US
\textipa /D Is v E r i tO l t i \textteshlig @ r k l O z d D @ b Ig pA rk./
SP
\textipa /d Is b E R i do l ti \textteshlig @ R g l o zd d @ bi k ba rk./
1,2,4,5,6
IN
\textipa /∥ [d Is w E R i to l t i \textteshlig @ R k l o z d ∥ [d @ b i g p a rk./
1,2,3,4,5
The little button was very broken.
US
\textipa / D @ l I R @ l b 2 tn w 2z v E r i br O k@n./
Table 2: Examples of applying phonological rules. The first column indicates which accented IPA they are and the third column indicates which rules were applied for the transformation
Figure 1: Synthesis Pipeline. We follow the synthesis and evaluation pipeline described in [ 13 ] . The key difference is that we condition the TTS model on a speaker embedding from the target language. In addition, we explicitly control whether duration alignment is applied between the American (US) phoneme sequence and the transformed target-accent phoneme sequence.
Probability
UK
SP
IN
UK With Alignment
80.28
1.23
0.17
UK Without Alignment
81.12
1.06
0.7
SP With Alignment
6.50
51.59
3.28
SP Without Alignment
3.9
50.86
2.73
IN With Alignment
0.82
6.08
86.4
Table 3: Effect of duration alignment on accentedness. Accent classification probabilities are reported for UK, Spanish (SP), and Indian (IN) conditions with and without phoneme-level duration alignment.
Probability
Similarity
Speech Quality
US
Target
US
Target
UTMOS
WER
CER
US Spk Emb.
73.8
-
0.71
-
4.38
3.42
2.83
+SP rules
25.97
-
0.50
-
4.39
24.91
13.56
+IN rules
16.85
-
0.42
-
4.38
32.66
18.32
SP Spk Emb.
26.6
23.7
0.73
0.47
3.73
7.99
5.64
+SP rules
2.97
51.59
0.38
0.60
3.87
13.13
7.79
Table 4: Overall effects of phonological rules on accentedness and speech quality. Accent probability and embedding similarity are reported for US and target accents, along with UTMOS, WER, and CER.
Accent Prob
Accent Sim
US ↓
SP ↑
US ↓
SP ↑
SP Spk Emb
32.46
22.86
0.70
0.32
+ Rule 1
29.80
22.20
0.70
0.37
+ Rule 2
21.13
23.00
0.66
0.32
+ Rule 3
30.50
22.78
0.69
0.32
+ Rule 4
28.47
25.22
0.69
0.35
Table 5: Effect of individual phonological rules on accentedness. Accent probability and embedding similarity are shown as each rule is added to the Spanish (SP) and Indian (IN) speaker embeddings.
Accuracy
Strength
Naturalness
US Spk Emb
1.000
4.04
4.09
+ SP rules
0.386
2.59
2.81
+ IN rules
0.229
2.88
2.73
SP Spk Emb
0.071
2.20
3.14
+ SP rules
0.757
3.08
2.94
IN Spk Emb
0.786
3.31
3.47
Table 6: Human evaluation of accent perception. We report listener judgments of accent accuracy, perceived accent strength (for correctly identified samples), and naturalness.
Figure 2: Human accent confusion matrix. Rows denote synthesis conditions (speaker embeddings with and without phonological rules), and columns represent listener-labeled accents.
Accent is an integral part of society, reflecting multiculturalism and shaping how individuals express identity. The majority of English speakers are non-native (L2) speakers, yet current Text-To-Speech (TTS) systems primarily model American-accented English due limited accented data. We propose Accent Vector, a controllable representation that enables accent manipulation in multilingual TTS without requiring accented training data. Accent Vector is derived by fine-tuning a TTS system on native speech of a different language (i.e. non-English) and computing task vectors capturing accent characteristics (i.e. in English). By scaling and interpolating the vector, we achieve fine-grained control over accent strength and generate mixed-accent speech. In addition, it generalizes beyond English, enabling accent control across multiple languages. Objective and human evaluations confirm the effectiveness of Accent Vector for fine-grained and compositional accent control.
Thanathai Lertpetchpun, Thanapat Trachu, Jihwan Lee +3
Signal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, USA · Thomas Lord Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, USA · Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California
Accent text-to-speech (TTS) aims to synthesize speech with a target accent while preserving speaker identity, but faces two key challenges: disentangling accent from speaker characteristics and effectively conditioning speech generation on the two disentangled factors. In this paper, we propose Joycent, a diffusion-based accent TTS framework that addresses both challenges. Our key idea is to separate accent and speaker information in both representation learning and TTS conditioning. Joycent uses WhisAID, a Whisper-based accent encoder with gradient reversal to learn speaker-disentangled accent representations, and introduces layer-specific conditional layer normalization to inject accent and speaker information at different stages of the text encoder. We evaluate Joycent on the Mandarin Regional Accent Corpus (MRAC) with seen and unseen speakers, including a challenging cross-accent setting where the speaker and accent prompts come from different accents. Experimental results show that Joycent improves accent similarity over existing methods while maintaining strong speaker similarity, with consistent gains under the challenging cross-accent setting. Subjective evaluation further confirms improved naturalness, accent similarity, and speaker preservation. The audio samples are available at https://oshindow.github.io/joycent/.
Xintong Wang, Junchuan Zhao, Ye Wang
School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Accent conversion and controllability remain fundamental challenges in cross-lingual text-to-speech (TTS), particularly for low-resource and phonetically diverse Indic languages. While recent large language model (LLM)-based TTS systems exhibit strong cross-lingual generalization, they provide limited explicit control over accent characteristics and intensity. In this paper, we propose CrossAccentTTS, a framework that enables both accent control and conversion while preserving speaker identity. Specifically, we introduce an Accent Intensity Controller (AIC) that injects weighted language embeddings into the accent subspace, allowing smooth interpolation between accents and fine-grained modulation of accent strength at inference time. Experiments on the Indic Multilingual and L2-arctic datasets shows that CrossAccent-TTS achieves precise control of accent intensity, outperforming strong baselines in accent similarity and controllability by maintaining speaker similarity and naturalness.
Ram Annamdevula, Ankit Tatawat, Ashishkumar P. Gudmalwar +2