On the Structural Failure of Chamfer Distance in 3D Shape Optimization

Non-rigid point cloud registration is central to soft-tissue shape analysis, but large deformations, noise, and outliers make correspondence estimation challenging. Most learning-based methods rely on local objectives such as Chamfer distance, which encourage point-wise proximity but do not constrain the global plausibility of the predicted deformation field. We address this limitation with DINE, a maximum a posteriori framework that augments distance-based registration with a learned statistical prior over displacement vector fields. DINE is applied to two registration backbones, Robust-DefReg and DefTransNet, using a two-stage strategy: a first-stage model is trained with Chamfer distance, its predicted deformation fields are used to estimate a prior, and the model is then refined with a combined distance and negative log-prior objective. We compare a full-field PCA Gaussian prior with a per-vector normalizing-flow prior. Experiments on DeformedTissue and SynBench show lower mean Chamfer distance under deformation and corruption. On DeformedTissue, DINE-PCA reduces Chamfer distance by approximately 27--69% relative to the corresponding Stage-1 backbone across deformation levels, and improves robustness by up to 66% for outliers and 83% for Gaussian noise. On SynBench, improvements are modest at the smallest deformation levels and reach approximately 59--79% from moderate to severe deformation. These results suggest that global deformation plausibility is an important constraint for reliable soft-tissue point cloud registration. (The code will be published soon.)

Point cloud completion commonly follows a coarse-to-fine paradigm, where a low-density coarse shape is first predicted and then upsampled to the target resolution. Although recent methods have improved global structure recovery, the fine stage often remains limited by simple upsampling and insufficient interaction with coarse structural features, making local detail reconstruction challenging. We propose SUMI, a diffusion-enhanced refinement module for coarse-to-fine point cloud completion. Unlike prior diffusion-based completion methods that use diffusion as a standalone point generator, SUMI injects noisy geometric features into cross-attention with coarse structural features, enabling reverse denoising to refine local geometry while preserving global consistency. SUMI can also be integrated into existing coarse-to-fine models as a flexible refinement module. Experiments on PCN, ShapeNet-55/34, and MVP demonstrate consistent improvements over strong baselines. SUMI achieves the best overall CD and F1-score on PCN, reduces CD by up to 16.1% on ShapeNet-55, and obtains the best CD across all output densities on MVP.

HyperbolicCD pioneered hyperbolic geometry for point cloud completion by replacing the Euclidean Chamfer distance with arcosh(1+alpha||x-y||^2), but the reported gains are modest (3-7% Chamfer reduction across SeedFormer, PointAttN and PMP-Net backbones on PCN and ShapeNet-55). We argue the bottleneck lies elsewhere: the loss is hyperbolic but the encoder it back-propagates through is Euclidean, so the position-dependent supervision of the loss is averaged away by the chain rule before it reaches the parameters. We call this a cross-geometry mismatch, and make it testable through two model-agnostic indicators, feature-loss correlation r_FL and effective gradient utilisation u_G. On an SVDFormer backbone trained with HyperbolicCD's loss alone we measure (r_FL, u_G) = (0.68, 39%). We propose Hyper^2, a dual-space consistency framework that extends HyperbolicCD by reusing the identical arcosh(1+alpha d^2) functional form as a positional bias on the refinement attention (a hyperbolic distance encoding), paired with HyperbolicCD's hyperbolic Chamfer loss under a single shared curvature alpha. Both operators are O(N log N) scalar non-linearities on Euclidean distances and together add only ~1.6% FLOPs over SVDFormer. Hyper^2 delivers -22.9% Chamfer on ShapeNet-55 over SVDFormer (well above the 13.2% linear sum of the -12.0% loss-only and -1.2% encoding-only single-space ablations) and -37.5% on the 21 unseen ShapeNet-34 categories. The two indicators remain essentially flat for any single-space configuration but jump together to (0.95, 87%) only when both encoder and loss are hyperbolic, supporting the claim that geometric consistency across encoder and loss, rather than either operator alone, is what enables hyperbolic supervision in point cloud completion. Code is available at https://github.com/Ethan-Zheng136/Hyper-2.