Organizations: Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China, also with the School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China, also with the CAS Engineering Laboratory for Intelligent Industrial Vision, Beijing 100190, China. · School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620 · Beijing Zhongke Huiling Robot Technology Co., Beijing 100192, China.
Achieving human-like dexterous manipulation through the collaboration of multi-fingered hands with robotic arms remains a longstanding challenge in robotics, primarily due to the scarcity of high-quality demonstrations and the complexity of high-dimensional action spaces. To address these challenges, we propose FAR-Dex, a hierarchical framework that integrates few-shot data augmentation with adaptive residual refinement to enable robust and precise arm-hand coordination in dexterous tasks. First, FAR-DexGen leverages the IsaacLab simulator to generate diverse and physically constrained trajectories from a few demonstrations, providing a data foundation for policy training. Second, FAR-DexRes introduces an adaptive residual module that refines policies by combining multi-step trajectory segments with observation features, thereby enhancing accuracy and robustness in manipulation scenarios. Experiments in both simulation and real-world demonstrate that FAR-Dex improves data quality by 13.4% and task success rates by 7% over state-of-the-art methods. It further achieves over 80% success in real-world tasks, enabling fine-grained dexterous manipulation with strong positional generalization.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Overview of the proposed FAR-Dex. (a) FAR-DexGen: demonstration trajectories are decomposed and transformed to generate large-scale synthetic data in the simulator. (b) FAR-DexRes: spatio-temporal residual fine-tuning is applied to four dexterous manipulation tasks. (c) Real-world validation: the trained policy is directly deployed in physical environments.
Fig. 2: FAR-Dex framework pipeline. (a) Few demonstrations Dh are segmented and augmented via spatial transformations in IsaacLab to form a large-scale dataset Dg . (b) The combined data are encoded with a pyramid convolutional network, where a consistency model distills the denoising network of πbase to accelerate inference (c) Building on abase from πbase , FAR-DexRes integrates multi-step trajectory embedding and observation features to generate adaptive weights σ for spatio-temporal residual refinement in dexterous manipulation.
Fig. 3: Data generation pipeline. Demonstration trajectories are illustrated using a top view, where transformations of the initial object pose Δci induce corresponding variations across different trajectory segments. These trajectories are then deployed in the simulation environment to collect data.
Fig. 4: Demonstration Data Collection System in the Real World.
Method
Generation Time ( Tg )
Generation Quality ( ηg )
MimiGen [ 10 ]
8.3ms
68.3%
DemoGen [ 13 ]
9.1ms
74.5%
FAR-DexGen (Ours)
10.3ms
87.9%
TABLE I: Comparison of different data generation methods
Methods
Task Success Rate ηp↑
Per-step Interference time Ts↓
Insert Cylinder
Pinch Pen
Grasp Handle
Move Card
Insert Cylinder
Pinch Pen
Grasp Handle
Move Card
ACT+3D [ 1 ]
23%
25%
46%
34%
4.5ms
4.6ms
4.5ms
4.3ms
DP3 [ 3 ]
83%
77%
80%
53%
29.1ms
31.5ms
29.8ms
29.6ms
ManiCM [ 30 ]
24%
22%
54%
45%
4.4ms
4.8ms
5.2ms
5.5ms
IDP3 [ 33 ]
80%
68%
73%
86%
31.6ms
32ms
31.7ms
32.4ms
Flow Policy [ 34 ]
25%
48%
43%
47%
3.2ms
3.7ms
3.3ms
3.6ms
TABLE II: Overall Performance Comparison with Baseline Methods in Simulation.
Fig. 5: Visualization of object interactions in simulation, compared with typical failure cases from existing methods
Ablation
Insert
Pinch
Grasp
Move
w/o RL
86%
65%
72%
73%
w/o Traj-Embed.
82%
58%
69%
80%
w/o Obs-Feat.
86%
78%
74%
82%
w/o Time-steps
87%
75%
70%
86%
FAR-DexRes (Ours)
93%
83%
88%
95%
TABLE III: Ablation Study of the RL Components.
Fig. 6: Residual Weight Variation Curves, where the Hand and Arm Weights Dynamically Change across Different Trajectory Segments.
Fig. 7: Position Generalization Success Rate Curves. As the degree of randomization increases, we record the task success rates of FAR-DexRes(Ours), DP3 [ 3 ] , and ResiP [ 16 ] .
Method
Insert
Pinch
Grasp
Move
ACT+3D [ 1 ]
20%
0%
40%
25%
DP3 [ 3 ]
65%
70%
70%
45%
ManiCM [ 30 ]
20%
0%
35%
40%
IDP3 [ 33 ]
75%
65%
65%
80%
FlowPolicy [ 34 ]
25%
10%
35%
40%
ResiP [ 16 ]
80%
70%
75%
80%
TABLE IV: Performance of FAR-DexRes in the Real World.