Context is all you need: Towards autonomous model-based process design using agentic AI in flowsheet simulations

Converting process sketches into executable simulation models remains a major bottleneck in process systems engineering, requiring substantial manual effort and simulator-specific expertise. Recent advances in generative AI have improved both engineering-diagram interpretation and LLM-assisted flowsheet generation, but these remain largely disconnected: diagram-understanding methods often stop at extracted graphs, while text-to-simulation workflows assume structured inputs rather than raw visual artifacts. To bridge this gap, we present an end-to-end multi-agent large language model system that converts process diagrams directly into executable Aspen HYSYS flowsheets. The framework decomposes the task into three coordinated layers: diagram parsing and interpretation, simulation model synthesis, and multi-level validation. Specialized agents handle visual interpretation, graph-based intermediate representation construction, code generation for the HYSYS COM interface, execution, and structural verification. We evaluate the framework on four chemical engineering case studies of increasing complexity, from a simple desalting process to an industrial aromatic production flowsheet with multiple recycle loops. The system produces executable HYSYS models in all cases, achieving complete structural fidelity on the two simpler cases and strong performance on the more complex ones, with connection consistency above 0.93 and stream consistency above 0.96. These results demonstrate a viable end-to-end sketch-to-simulation workflow while highlighting remaining challenges in dense recycle structures, implicit diagram semantics, and simulator-interface constraints.

Constructing an executable chemical-process model remains manually intensive. Chemical engineers translate underspecified requests into coupled decisions about unit operations, thermodynamics, streams, specifications, degrees of freedom (DoF), initialization, solver repair, and optimization; one error can invalidate the model. CRAFTS mirrors the staged workflow of chemical engineers by decomposing simulation building into bounded subtasks assigned to seven bounded roles, with deterministic IDAES/Pyomo gates between stages. Given a natural-language request, process flowsheet diagram (PFD) evidence, and curated chemical-engineering knowledge, Input Understanding and Intent recover requirements, constraints, and process semantics; visual, topology, and specification specialists translate them into typed simulator contracts; and Debug and Optimization support bounded repair and eligible optimization. Fine-tuning is applied to the three schema-critical visual, topology, and specification roles, while the remaining roles use untuned Qwen. The resulting VisualGraphIR, TopologyIR, SpecIR, BuildPlan, and SolveReport expose unit, port, thermodynamic, numerical, and execution decisions. Compatible constructors, property packages, and runners are attached only after semantic artifacts pass engineering gates. We introduce OpenIDAES-450, a 450-case IDAES process- simulation dataset, and evaluate the complete seven-role LangChain/LangGraph workflow through solve and eligible optimization on its frozen 82-case held-out split. CRAFTS completes the prescribed validation and execution contract for for 91.5% of cases and achieves unit, stream, and directed-connection F1 scores of 0.815, 0.791, and 0.782. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of role specialization, typed intermediate representations, and deterministic engineering gates for reliable automated process-model construction.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in reasoning, planning, and tool use, but many scientific and engineering tasks require more than plausible text and code generation. They require understanding how a system responds to intervention, which in practice depends on controlled experimentation. In this work, we propose a multi-agent framework that enables LLM agents to conduct controlled experiments with scientific simulation models for pharmaceutical process design. Given a user query and a baseline configuration, the system constructs a structured task representation, designs experiments, executes comparative simulation, interprets the resulting outcomes, and synthesizes evidence-based recommendations for process parameter optimization. By coupling language models with high-fidelity simulation models in an interactive agent framework, the proposed system supports reasoning through intervention, comparison, and observation. As a result, it produces more specific and actionable outputs than language-only reasoning. In an industrial application setting, this advantage is reflected in higher output specificity as well as improved user-rated correctness and helpfulness. Ablation studies and visualized case analyses further demonstrate the effectiveness and practical utility of simulation-integrated experimental reasoning.