cs.AIFeb 24, 2026

Distilling Deep Reinforcement Learning into Interpretable Fuzzy Rules: An Explainable AI Framework

Authors: Sanup S. Araballi, Simon Khan, Chilukuri K. Mohan

Organizations: Dept. of EECS, Syracuse University, NY 13244, USA · Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome, NY 13441, USA

Abstract

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents achieve remarkable performance in continuous control but remain opaque, hindering deployment in safety-critical domains. Existing explainability methods either provide only local insights (SHAP, LIME) or employ over-simplified surrogates failing to capture continuous dynamics (decision trees). This work proposes a Hierarchical Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) Fuzzy Classifier System (FCS) distilling neural policies into human-readable IF-THEN rules through K-Means clustering for state partitioning and Ridge Regression for local action inference. Three quantifiable metrics are introduced: Fuzzy Rule Activation Density (FRAD) measuring explanation focus, Fuzzy Set Coverage (FSC) validating vocabulary completeness, and Action Space Granularity (ASG) assessing control mode diversity. Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) validates temporal behavioral fidelity. Empirical evaluation on Lunar Lander(Continuous) shows the Triangular membership function variant achieves 81.48% ±\pm 0.43% fidelity, outperforming Decision Trees by 21 percentage points. The framework exhibits statistically superior interpretability (FRAD = 0.814 vs. 0.723 for Gaussian, p<0.001p < 0.001) with low MSE (0.0053) and DTW distance (1.05). Extracted rules such as ``IF lander drifting left at high altitude THEN apply upward thrust with rightward correction'' enable human verification, establishing a pathway toward trustworthy autonomous systems.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Physics-Aware Policy Distillation

    Jul 27, 2026Shaker Al-Tamari, Waled KadourRL ControlInterpretability in RL

  2. ORCAID: Oblique Rule-Based Continuous-Action Interpretation for Deep RL Policies

    Jul 8, 2026Ignacio D. Lopez-Miguel, Ezio Bartocci, Thomas Eiter +1Reinforcement LearningInterpretable ML

  3. Explainably Safe Reinforcement Learning

    Jun 3, 2026Sabine Rieder, Stefan Pranger, Debraj Chakraborty +2Reinforcement LearningInterpretability in RL