Safety-aware Goal-oriented Semantic Sensing, Communication, and Control for Robotics
Organizations: Department of Engineering, King’s College London, U.K. · Department of Intelligent Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden · Department of Automation Technology, ABB Corporate Research Sweden, 72226 Västerås, Sweden · Institute for Digital Communications, FriedrichAlexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
Abstract
Wirelessly-connected robotic systems empower robots with real-time intelligence by leveraging remote computing resources for decision-making. However, the data exchange between robots and edge servers often overwhelms communication links, introducing latency that degrades task performance. To tackle this, goal-oriented semantic communication (GSC) has been introduced for wirelessly-connected robotic systems to extract and transmit only goal-relevant semantic representations. While this improves task effectiveness, it generally overlooks practical safety requirements. Meanwhile, existing robotics research often treats safety primarily as a control-level problem, without systematically considering safety across sensing, communication, and control in a closed-loop manner. To bridge this gap, we investigate how to enable safety-aware goal-oriented semantic (SA-GS) sensing, communication, and control co-design in wirelessly-connected robotic systems, aiming to maximize the robotic task effectiveness subject to practical safety requirements. We first introduce {an} architecture {for} wirelessly-connected robotic systems and representative use cases. We then summarize general safety requirements and effectiveness metrics across the use cases. Next, we systematically analyze the unique safety and effectiveness challenges in sensing, communication, and control. Based on these, we further present potential SA-GS research directions. Finally, an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) target tracking case study validates that one of the presented SA-GS research directions, i.e., semantic-based C&C packet execution, could significantly improve safety rate and tracking success rate by more than 2 times and 4.5 times, respectively.
Figures & tables
| Robot Embeded Sensor | ||||
| Sensor Type | Data Type | Devices | Transmission Frequency | Data Load |
| Tactile Sensor | Haptic | Tactile Array Sensor | 100-1000 Hz | Low-Medium |
| Torque Sensor | Force/Torque | F/T Sensor (e.g., ATI Mini40) | 500-2000 Hz | Low-Medium |
| Joint Encoder | Joint Angles/Velocities | Optical or Magnetic Encoder | 500-1000 Hz | Low |
| Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) | Acceleration, Angular Velocity | MPU6050 IMU | 100-1000 Hz | Low-Medium |
| Magnetometer | Heading | BNO055 Orientation Sensor | 10-100 Hz | Low |
| Use Case | Effectiveness Metrics | Description |
| Robot Arm Grasping | Grasp Success Rate | The percentage of successful grasps out of the total number of grasping attempts. |
| Execution Time | The time for the robot arm to complete the entire grasping process. | |
| Mean Picks Per Hour (MPPH) | The average number of successful picks a robot arm can perform in an hour. | |
| UAV-assisted Task | Tracking Accuracy | Measures how closely the UAV maintains its states relative to targets’ states. |
| Tracking Success Rate | Measures how consistently the UAV can successfully track targets. | |
| Identity F1 score (IDF1) | Evaluate performance in maintaining the correct identities of tracked objects over time. |
| Semantic Representations | Data Type | Robot Arm Grasping | UAV-assisted Task | Multi-robot Exploration | |||
| Safety | Effectiveness | Safety | Effectiveness | Safety | Effectiveness | ||
| Object’s attributes (e.g., type, material, size, and surface texture) | Image, Point cloud | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Object 6D pose | Point cloud | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Grasping position | Point cloud | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Obstacles (e.g., walls, roads, and barriers) | Image, Point cloud | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Obstacle’s 6D pose | Point cloud | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Robotics
Robotics studies the design and control of machines that perceive, move, and act in physical environments.
See all 751 papers