Balancing Multimodal Domain Generalization via Gradient Modulation and Projection
Authors: Hongzhao Li, Guohao Shen, Shupan Li, Mingliang Xu, Muhammad Haris Khan
Organizations: School of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Zhengzhou University · Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Swarm Systems, Ministry of Education · National Supercomputing Center in Zhengzhou · Shandong Bosuan Zhixin Information Technology Co., Ltd · Mohamed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Multimodal Domain Generalization (MMDG) leverages the complementary strengths of multiple modalities to enhance model generalization on unseen domains. A central challenge in multimodal learning is optimization imbalance, where modalities converge at different speeds during training. This imbalance leads to unequal gradient contributions, allowing some modalities to dominate the learning process while others lag behind. Existing balancing strategies typically regulate each modality's gradient contribution based on its classification performance on the source domain to alleviate this issue. However, relying solely on source-domain accuracy neglects a key insight in MMDG: modalities that excel on the source domain may generalize poorly to unseen domains, limiting cross-domain gains. To overcome this limitation, we propose Gradient Modulation Projection (GMP), a unified strategy that promotes balanced optimization in MMDG. GMP first decouples gradients associated with classification and domain-invariance objectives. It then modulates each modality's gradient based on semantic and domain confidence. Moreover, GMP dynamically adjusts gradient projections by tracking the relative strength of each task, mitigating conflicts between classification and domain-invariant learning within modality-specific encoders. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GMP achieves state-of-the-art performance and integrates flexibly with diverse MMDG methods, significantly improving generalization across multiple benchmarks.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Performance of state of the art MMDG methods, RNA-Net ( Planamente et al. 2024 ) , MOOSA ( Dong, Chatzi, and Fink 2024 ) , SimMMDG ( Dong et al. 2023 ) , and CMRF ( Fan et al. 2024 ) , evaluated with and without our proposed GMP strategy.
Domain
Method
Video
Audio
Video-Audio
Source
Uni-video
74.55
-
-
Uni-audio
-
52.35
-
Base
70.28
48.63
76.31
OGM-GE
72.66
50.33
77.69
Grad-Blending
72.31
50.62
78.03
GMP(Ours)
72.69
50.52
78.05
Table 1: Performance comparison on source and target sets using the EPIC-Kitchens dataset ( Kay et al. 2017 ) . Source results are averaged over validation sets (of the seen domains), and target results are averaged over test sets from the corresponding unseen domains. Uni-video and Uni-audio denote independently trained single-modality models.
Figure 2: The overall training strategy of our proposed GMP.
Method
EPIC-Kitchens
HAC
Base
55.06
61.86
Grad-Blending
55.49
62.66
OGM-GE
55.71
62.83
AGM
55.39
62.16
CGGM
55.30
62.80
DRB
54.88
61.92
Table 2: Comparison of our proposed GMP strategy with existing gradient strategies. All methods use concatenation fusion as the base.
Method
EPIC-Kitchens
HAC
RNA-Net
60.31
62.88
MOOSA
60.29
67.39
SimMMDG
60.81
67.82
CMRF
60.60
67.66
RNA-Net†
60.92
65.21
MOOSA†
61.79
68.75
Table 3: Integration with existing MMDG methods. Methods marked with † indicate integration of GMP.
Method
EPIC-Kitchens
HAC
Base
55.06
61.86
IGDM-only
55.98
63.05
CAGP-only
55.34
63.41
Full
57.36
64.91
Unified Modulation
54.97
62.50
w/o ktm
55.19
62.33
Table 4: Ablation study results demonstrating the effectiveness of individual components and strategies.
Figure 3: t-SNE plots on the HAC dataset (target domain A) compare the Base and GMP methods in classification and domain invariance.
Method
EPIC-Kitchens
HAC
Activation-based
52.23
57.49
Concatenation
55.06
61.86
Summation
52.94
58.51
FiLM
53.16
59.35
Activation-based†
55.69
61.33
Concatenation†
57.36
64.91
Table 5: Combined with GMP, conventional fusion methods consistently gain considerable improvement. † indicates GMP strategy is applied.
Figure 4: Hyperparameter sensitivity analysis of GMP.
Figure 5: Discrepancy ratio trajectories ( ρtm , σtm ) on EPIC-Kitchens. GMP mitigates cross-modal imbalance by driving ratios toward 1, achieving balanced semantic and domain optimization.
1OLIVES at the Center for Signal and Information Processing CSIP, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.