Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved strong performance in robotic control; however, state-of-the-art policy learning methods, such as actor-critic methods, still suffer from high sample complexity and often produce physically inconsistent actions. This limitation stems from neural policies implicitly rediscovering complex physics from data alone, despite accurate dynamics models being readily available in simulators. In this paper, we introduce a novel physics-informed RL framework, called PIPER, that seamlessly integrates physical constraints directly into neural policy optimization with analytical soft physics constraints. At the core of our method is the integration of a differentiable Lagrangian residual as a regularization term within the actor's objective. This residual, extracted from a robot's simulator description, subtly biases policy updates towards dynamically consistent solutions. Crucially, this physics integration is realized through an additional loss term during policy optimization, requiring no alterations to existing simulators or core RL algorithms. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly improves learning efficiency, stability, and control accuracy, establishing a new paradigm for efficient and physically consistent robotic control.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison of architecture and performance between SAC and Physical-Informed SAC . (a) The standard SAC framework relying solely on the MuJoCo simulator, resulting in High Error in the robotic arm task. (b) The Physical-Informed SAC framework which incorporates an Analytic Physics & Constraints module, leading to Low Error and precise control.
Figure 2: Overview of the physics-informed actor–critic reinforcement learning framework. The actor policy generates control actions based on the current system state, while the critic network evaluates action quality by estimating the value function. A PINN, coupled with a high-fidelity simulator (MuJoCo), embeds prior physical laws and system dynamics into the learning loop, providing physically consistent state transitions and constraints. The interaction between data-driven policy optimization and physics-based modeling improves training stability, sample efficiency, and generalization performance compared to purely data-driven reinforcement learning approaches.
Method
Model-Free
No Test-Time Optimization
Algorithm Agnostic
Uses Lagrangian Structure
PPO / SAC / TD3
✓
✓
✓
×
Deep Lagrangian ( Lutter et al., 2019 )
×
✓
×
✓
Residual RL ( Johannink et al., 2019 )
✓
✓
✓
×
Safety Layer / CPO ( Dalal et al., 2018 )
✓
×
×
×
HJB-RL ( Cheng et al., 2021 )
✓
×
×
×
PI-MBRL ( Ramesh and Ravindran, 2023 )
×
✓
×
×
Table 1: Comparison of physics-aware reinforcement learning approaches.
Figure 3: Qualitative comparison of final end-effector configurations in the FetchReach-v4 environment. The green background indicates the simulated MuJoCo workspace. Top row: Baseline policies often exhibit steady-state error or drift due to lack of structural knowledge. Bottom row: PIPER policies achieve tighter convergence to the target geometry by exploiting the null space of the manipulator dynamics.
Algorithm
Success Rate
Final Error
Precision Gain
Stability ( σ )
Stability Gain
Steps to 95%
Efficiency Gain
PPO
100%
9.35 mm
–
10.94
–
46,650
–
PIPER-PPO
100%
8.02 mm
+14.2%
8.13
+25.7%
32,800
+30%
TD3
100%
16.56 mm
–
17.59
–
23,850
–
PIPER-TD3
100%
3.39 mm
+79.5%
11.53
+34.5%
17,550
+26%
SAC
100%
7.55 mm
–
11.41
–
24,250
–
PIPER-SAC
100%
2.15 mm
+71.5%
8.10
+29.0%
13,250
+45%
Table 2: Performance Metrics for FetchReach-v4 . PIPER improves efficiency, precision, and stability across PPO, TD3, and SAC.
Figure 4: FetchReach Learning Dynamics. Comparison of baseline and our physics-informed variants (shaded regions represent ±1 standard deviation across 5 random seeds). Our PIPER-SAC ( orange ) demonstrates superior convergence speed by exploiting the inertial null-space. Zoom in to view better details.
Figure 5: Performance Analysis across Contact-Rich Environments. Comparison of Baseline TQC+HER vs. PIPER-TQC. Zoom in to view better details.
Task
Algorithm
Success Rate
Final Error
Precision Gain
Stability ( σ )
Stability Gain
Sample Efficiency
Efficiency Gain
FetchPush
TQC+HER
98%
12.4 mm
–
14.3
–
420,000
–
PIPER-TQC
100% ( ↑ 2% )
8.1 mm
+34.7%
7.7
+47%
310,000
+26%
FetchSlide
TQC+HER
85%
50.2 mm
–
13.6
–
850,000
–
PIPER-TQC
92% ( ↑ 7% )
20.1 mm
+60.0%
8.3
+39%
680,000
+20%
PickAndPlace
TQC+HER
96%
8.5 mm
–
25.0
–
470,000
–
PIPER-TQC
99% ( ↑ 3% )
4.2 mm
+51.0%
14.6
+42%
362,000
+23%
Table 3: Performance Metrics for Contact-Rich Tasks ( Push, Slide, PickAndPlace ). Comparison between Baseline TQC+HER and PIPER-TQC. Note: Success Rate is included for completeness, but gains are most visible in precision and stability.
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) offers powerful control for industrial cyber-physical systems (ICPSs), but its "black-box" exploration risks violating strict hardware safety limits. Typically, these constraints are managed through complex reward shaping. In this work-in-progress paper, we embed a differentiable physics model directly into the proximal policy optimization (PPO) actor loss function. By simulating short-horizon future trajectories during training, the policy is penalized for anticipated safety violations independent of the task-reward signal. Evaluated on a simulated 1-degree-of-freedom helicopter testbed with strict pitch constraints, our physics-informed soft regularizations substantially reduce constraint violations while maintaining reliable target tracking.
Georg Schäfer, Jakob Rehrl, Stefan Huber
Josef Ressel Centre for Intelligent and Secure Industrial Automation, Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Salzburg, Austria · Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
State of the art quadrupedal locomotion approaches integrate Model Predictive Control (MPC) with Reinforcement Learning (RL), enabling complex motion capabilities with planning and terrain adaptive behaviors. However, they often face compounding errors over long horizons and have limited interpretability due to the absence of physical inductive biases. We address these issues by integrating Lagrangian Neural Networks (LNNs) into an RL MPC framework, enabling physically consistent dynamics learning. At deployment, our inverse dynamics infinite horizon MPC scheme avoids costly matrix inversions, improving computational efficiency by up to 4x with minimal loss of task performance. We validate our framework through multiple ablations of the proposed LNN and its variants. We show improved sample efficiency, reduced long-horizon error, and faster real time planning compared to unstructured neural dynamics. Lastly, we also test our framework on the Unitree Go1 robot to show real world viability.
the Robert Bosch Center for Cyber-Physical Systems, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru. · the Robert Bosch Center for Cyber-Physical Systems and the Department of Computer Science & Automation, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising solution to accomplish complex robotic control tasks; however, most of the current work ignores the safety requirements. Safe RL seeks to maximize task performance while satisfying explicit physical constraints, but current algorithms struggle to learn the policy efficiently with precise constraint satisfaction. This work proposes PPO-EAL, a novel first-order constrained policy optimization framework that integrates exact augmented Lagrangian optimization into proximal policy optimization for safe robotic control. By combining clipped policy updates with exact quadratic penalty terms, PPO-EAL achieves theoretically grounded constraint enforcement without requiring impractically large penalty factors. A momentum-regulated multiplier update further improves dual-variable stability, reducing constraint oscillation and unsafe behavior while preserving task performance. We provide exactness and convergence analysis under standard stochastic approximation assumptions. Extensive validation across diverse GPU-accelerated robotic benchmarks-including cart-pole balancing, cart-double-pendulum stabilization, 7-DoF Franka end-effector reaching, and quadrupedal locomotion-demonstrates superior safety precision and reward performance compared with state-of-the-art first-order safe RL baselines. Finally, we demonstrate zero-shot sim-to-real deployment in a contact-rich gear assembly task, where PPO-EAL substantially improves task success, reduces peak contact force, and enhances operational robustness. These results establish PPO-EAL as a general and practically deployable safe RL framework for diverse safety-critical robotic systems.
Jiatao Ding, Songqun Gao, Andrea Del Prete +1
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123, Trento, Italy