stat.MLMar 16, 2026

Bayesian Symbolic Regression for Missing Physics

Authors: Arno Strouwen

Organizations: Strouwen Statistics · Biosystems Department, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Model-based approaches for (bio)process systems often suffer from incomplete knowledge of the underlying physical, chemical, or biological laws. Universal differential equations, which embed neural networks within differential equations, have emerged as powerful tools to learn this missing physics from experimental data. However, neural networks are inherently opaque, motivating their post-processing via symbolic regression to obtain interpretable mathematical expressions. Genetic algorithm-based symbolic regression is a popular approach for this post-processing step, but provides only point estimates and cannot quantify the confidence we should place in a discovered equation. We address this limitation by applying Bayesian symbolic regression, which uses Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo to sample from the posterior distribution over symbolic expression trees. This approach naturally quantifies uncertainty in the recovered model structure. We demonstrate the methodology on a Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system and then show how a well-designed experiment leads to lower uncertainty in a fed-batch bioreactor case study.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Bayesian Symbolic Regression with Entropic Reinforcement Learning

    Aug 10, 2026Oussama Boussif, Mohammed Mahfoud, Younesse Kaddar +6Bayesian InferenceSymbolic Regression

  2. Experimental Design for Missing Physics

    Mar 21, 2026Arno Strouwen, Sebastián Micluţa-Câmpeanu

  3. Deep Variational Inference Symbolic Regression

    May 1, 2026James Butterworth, Gevik Grigorian, Alejandro DiazDelaOUncertainty QuantificationVariational Inference