Existing test-time scaling (TTS) methods for unified multimodal models (UMMs) in text-to-image (T2I) generation primarily rely on search or sampling strategies that produce only instance-level improvements, limiting the ability to learn from prior inferences and accumulate knowledge across similar prompts. To overcome these limitations, we propose Meta-TTRL, a metacognitive test-time reinforcement learning framework. Meta-TTRL performs test-time parameter optimization guided by model-intrinsic monitoring signals derived from the meta-knowledge of UMMs, achieving self-improvement and capability-level improvement at test time. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Meta-TTRL generalizes well across three representative UMMs, including Janus-Pro-7B, BAGEL, and Qwen-Image, achieving significant gains on compositional reasoning tasks and multiple T2I benchmarks with limited data. We provide the first comprehensive analysis to investigate the potential of test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) for T2I generation in UMMs. Our analysis further reveals a key insight underlying effective TTRL: metacognitive synergy, where monitoring signals align with the model's optimization regime to enable self-improvement.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning in UMMs.
Figure 2: Meta-TTRL operates with a meta-level introspector that constructs rubric and provides intrinsic monitoring signals, and an object-level generator that produces candidate images. These intrinsic signals are aggregated as rewards to guide policy optimization and improve T2I generation. For clarity, the figure omits the question index m and shows only representative verification questions.
Model
TIIF-Bench ↑
T2I-CompBench++ ↑
DPG ↑
Short
Long
Color
Shape
Texture
2D Spatial
3D Spatial
Non- Spatial
Numeracy
Complex
Score
Qwen-Image
83.45
82.48
82.80
59.86
74.51
44.30
45.36
31.71
75.82
38.38
88.32
w/ Meta-TTRL
85.28
84.67
84.50
62.42
76.36
46.59
46.11
31.85
76.77
38.48
89.00
△
+1.83
+2.19
+1.70
+2.56
+1.85
+2.29
+0.75
+0.14
+0.95
+0.10
+0.68
↑2.19%
↑2.66%
↑2.05%
↑4.28%
↑2.48%
↑5.17%
↑1.65%
↑0.44%
↑1.25%
↑0.26%
↑0.77%
BAGEL
71.65
70.32
80.81
57.94
71.54
34.03
37.78
31.11
65.52
37.78
84.03
Table 1: Evaluation results on TIIF-Bench ( Wei et al., 2025 ) , T2I-CompBench++ ( Huang et al., 2025 ) , DPG-Bench ( Hu et al., 2024 ) . Arrows ( ↑ ) denote that higher is better. The T2I-CompBench++ score is normalized to a 0–100 scale for visualization.
Figure 3: Qualitative case studies of Meta-TTRL
Model
Train on
Vanilla
Meta-TTRL
Janus-Pro-7B
T2I++
77.80
81.14 +3.34
TIIF
79.40 +1.60
DPG
78.45 +0.65
Bagel
T2I++
79.24
83.37 +4.13
TIIF
82.67 +3.43
DPG
82.67 +3.43
Table 2: Performance on GenEval for all evaluated models
Train on
Eval on
Vanilla
Meta-TTRL
T2I++
TIIF
65.68
68.71 +3.03
DPG
83.84
84.63 +0.79
TIIF
T2I++
35.25
40.44 +5.19
DPG
83.84
84.32 +0.48
DPG
T2I++
35.25
38.93 +3.68
TIIF
65.68
66.71 +1.03
Table 3: Cross-benchmark generalization on Janus-Pro-7B.
Figure 4: Performance comparison between Meta-TTRL (blue) and E-TTRL (red) on T2I-CompBench++ across eight subdimensions.
Figure 5: Performance comparison of Baseline, RL Leakage with UnifiedReward, and Meta-TTRL across three T2I benchmarks. Left: Radar plot comparing performance on T2I-CompBench++. Right: Bar charts showing results on TIIF-Bench and DPG-Bench.
Train on
Janus-Pro-7B
Bagel
Qwem-Image
Vanilla
GIT
Meta-TTRL
Vanilla
GIT
Meta-TTRL
Vanilla
GIT
Meta-TTRL
T2I++
35.25
47.16 +11.91
48.90 +13.65
52.60
54.83 +2.23
55.13 +2.53
56.71
57.71 +1.00
57.88 +1.17
TIIF
65.68
69.73 +4.05
71.08 +5.40
71.00
72.70 +1.70
75.29 +4.29
82.97
84.24 +1.27
84.98 +2.01
DPG
83.84
84.78 +0.94
85.67 +1.83
84.03
86.24 +2.21
86.33 +2.30
88.32
88.83 +0.51
89.00 +0.68
Table 4: Comparison between Meta-TTRL and replacing rubric evaluation with GIT across three benchmarks.
Test-Time Reinforcement Learning adapts policies at deployment using interaction or self-generated feedback, without a separate task-specific training phase.
Recently, remarkable progress has been made in Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs), which integrate vision-language generation and understanding capabilities within a single framework. However, a model's strong visual understanding often fails to transfer to visual generation: it may correctly judge prompt-image alignment while failing to generate a faithful image from the same prompt. This raises a compelling question: Can a model improve itself by using its understanding module to reward its generation module? We introduce SRUM, a self-rewarding post-training framework directly applicable to existing UMMs of various designs. SRUM creates a feedback loop where the model's own understanding module acts as an internal ``evaluator'', providing corrective signals to improve generation without additional human-labeled data or external reward models. To provide comprehensive feedback, SRUM uses a global-local dual reward system: a global reward ensures overall visual semantics and layout, while a local reward refines fine-grained, object-level fidelity. SRUM shows strong generalization, boosting performance on T2I-CompBench from 82.18 to 88.37 and on T2I-ReasonBench from 43.82 to 46.75. Overall, our work establishes a powerful paradigm for enabling a UMM's understanding module to guide and enhance its own generation via self-rewarding.
Weiyang Jin, Yuwei Niu, Jiaqi Liao +4
HKU MMLab · The University of Hong Kong · Shenzhen Loop Area Institute +2
Unified multimodal models (UMMs) understand and generate both text and images, which lets a model produce its own training data. Existing self-improvement in UMMs keeps supervision on the visual side, where image understanding judges image generation. We propose recursive cross-capability self-improvement (RSI), a training loop in which the text and visual abilities of a UMM supply training data for one another. In each round, the model generates images and reads them to find where it falls short. It then writes programs aimed at these shortcomings, and execution verifies every result against its specification. Verified renders train image generation, while labeled renders and the model's own correct programs train visual understanding and program writing. Program execution thus acts as a source of truth outside the model, so errors do not accumulate across rounds. We study RSI on charts and build BasicChartBench to evaluate open models early in training. On requests worded differently from training, four rounds of RSI raise the score from 45.7% to 60.2%, while continued training stays at 46.3%. Verified construction carries most of the gain, and targeting the model's failures adds 3.5%. Along the way, the share of verified programs rises from 48.9% to 95.2%, and the reader's accuracy on edited renders rises from 55.6% to 87.4%.
Huijuan Wang, Chufan Shi, Cheng Yang +3
University of Southern California · University of California San Diego · Carnegie Mellon University
Recently, unified multimodal models (UMMs) have made remarkable progress in integrating visual understanding and generation, demonstrating strong potential for complex text-to-image (T2I) tasks. Despite their theoretical promise, a persistent capability gap exists: UMMs typically exhibit superior visual understanding but comparatively weaker generative capabilities. This discrepancy arises largely from the intrinsic decoupling between the understanding and generation processes. While a UMM can accurately interpret fine-grained visual details, it often struggles to produce semantically coherent images from complex textual prompts. To address this challenge, we explore UMMs' internal understanding capability to enhance generation quality. We propose a token-level intrinsic text-image alignment reward mechanism, GvU, enabling the UMM to act simultaneously as teacher and student: it evaluates its own outputs using the understanding branch to guide the generations accordingly. Building upon this, we design a self-supervised reinforcement learning framework, allowing UMMs to iteratively improve their generation quality through understanding-based intrinsic reward signals--without reliance on external supervision. Experimental results show that our method substantially boosts UMMs' generation, which in turn strengthens their fine-grained visual understanding, narrowing the capability gap between UMMs' visual understanding and generation.
Jiadong Pan, Liang Li, Yuxin Peng +6
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Peking University +2