Prose2Policy (P2P): A Practical LLM Pipeline for Translating Natural-Language Access Policies into Executable Rego

This paper presents an LLM-based system that translates natural-language access control policies (NLACPs) into executable Rego code for Open Policy Agent (OPA). It provides a modular, end-to-end pipeline for policy detection, component extraction, schema validation, linting, compilation, and automated test generation and execution. The system is designed to bridge the gap between human-readable access requirements and machine-enforceable policy-as-code (PaC), with a focus on deployment reliability and security correctness. We evaluate the system on 372 ACRE-complete access control statements with non-null subject, action, and resource annotations against a direct single-prompt LLM baseline to isolate the contribution of structured decomposition and schema-aware validation. The system achieves a 50.3% end-to-end policy correctness rate, compared with 15.3% for the baseline, representing a 3.3x improvement. A policy is counted as correct only if it satisfies compilation, linting, and both positive and negative tests, making this a strict measure of deployable correctness. On security-critical patterns, the system generates correct deny semantics for 87.5% of deny policies (baseline: 37.5%), ownership conditions for 100% of ownership-qualified policies (baseline: 40%), and status-qualified conditions for 100% of status-qualified policies (baseline: 55.6%). These results indicate that structured decomposition and schema-aware validation play a critical role in improving the reliability of LLM-generated authorization policies.

Organizations increasingly use LLMs for policy, compliance, risk, and operational decision support, requiring evidence validation, review routing, version control, and auditability. We introduce Policy-as-Skill (PaS), a modular runtime that packages these functions as executable, versioned policy capabilities. Thirteen methods are evaluated with a fixed Gemma4 backend on 600 development tasks. PaS+Audit achieves 53.8% exact accuracy, macro-F1 0.346, review F1 0.854, citation precision 1.000, policy-reference recall 0.984, and audit completeness 1.000, outperforming LLM+RAG on most governance and review metrics. Deterministic control raises aggregate accuracy to 61.2% but is strongly task dependent, supporting selective rather than universal rule-based intervention.

Customer-service LLM agents must follow organizational policy when acting on a user's behalf. Compliance failures arise from either forbidden actions, such as granting an ineligible change, or omitted procedural requirements, such as identification or confirmation. Runtime safeguards can intervene on risky actions, but action-local checks do not guide an agent through a multi-step procedure. Workflow-following systems support prescribed process execution, but primarily target workflow completion rather than safeguarding agent behavior. PolicyGuide instead compiles each domain policy into a workflow graph and invokes a proactive verifier at user-turn boundaries. From persisted graph state, the verifier reconciles open requests and returns step-specific remediation along a policy-compliant path. Across the $τ^2$-bench airline, retail, and telecom domains with a GPT-5.4 agent and verifier, PolicyGuide raises mean $\mathrm{Pass}^4$ from $0.42$ to $0.62$, with the largest gain on telecom ($0.19$ to $0.61$), the most workflow-structured domain. The same workflows transfer to Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro agents. Complementary evaluations find the lowest observed attack-success rate under adversarial users and the strongest procedural compliance in an author-designed workflow-level validation.