Look Where It Matters: High-Resolution Crops Retrieval for Efficient VLMs

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) struggle as query-relevant objects become smaller. To address this, recent training-free approaches dynamically retrieve and zoom into local image regions. However, we show that indiscriminately applying retrieval ignores a critical vulnerability: the resolution-context trade-off. Patch-based zooming recovers details for small targets, but can split large objects and destroy global spatial context; attention-based retrieval better preserves large objects, but remains less reliable on tiny details; and global perception is often fastest when retrieval is unnecessary. Motivated by these failure modes, we introduce ViRGo (Visual Retrieval or Global Perception), a lightweight framework that formulates visual retrieval as an adaptive routing problem. ViRGo estimates object scale from the VLM's intrinsic localization heads during the initial forward pass and combines it with semantic token confidence to select between global perception, patch-based retrieval, and attention-based retrieval with minimal additional computation. Experiments across multiple VQA benchmarks and object-size groups show that ViRGo improves the accuracy-efficiency trade-off: it matches patch retrieval on small details, leverages attention-based retrieval for larger objects, and reduces inference time by routing to the global baseline when zooming is unnecessary.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) increasingly operate on ultra-high-resolution (UHR) Earth observation imagery, yet they remain vulnerable to a severe scale mismatch between large-scale scene context and micro-scale targets. We refer to this empirical gap as a "resolution illusion": higher input resolution provides the appearance of richer visual detail, but does not necessarily yield reliable perception of spatially small, task-relevant evidence. To benchmark this challenge, we introduce UHR-Micro, a benchmark comprising 11,253 instructions grounded in 1,212 UHR images, designed to evaluate VLMs at the spatial limits of native Earth observation imagery. UHR-Micro spans diverse micro-target scales, context requirements, task families, and visual conditions, and provides diagnostic annotations that support controlled evaluation and fine-grained error attribution. Experiments with representative high-resolution VLMs show substantial failures in spatial grounding and evidence parsing, despite access to high-resolution inputs. Further analysis suggests that these failures are not fully resolved by increasing model capacity, but are closely tied to insufficient guidance in locating and using task-relevant micro-evidence. Motivated by this finding, we propose Micro-evidence Active Perception (MAP), a reference agent that decomposes queries into evidence-seeking steps, actively inspects candidate regions, and grounds its answers in localized observations. MAP-Agent improves micro-level perception by making high-resolution reasoning evidence-centered rather than image-centered. Together, UHR-Micro and MAP-Agent provide a diagnostic platform for evaluating, understanding, and advancing high-resolution reasoning in Earth observation VLMs. Datasets and source code were released at https://github.com/MiliLab/UHR-Micro.

Failures of high-resolution MLLMs are commonly attributed to a visual problem, motivating zooming, cropping, and related visual interventions to recover fine-grained evidence or suppress interference. Yet recent studies suggest that relevant visual evidence is already encoded in intermediate representations, indicating that visual-side improvements alone insufficient. This raises a natural question: does the remaining bottleneck lie in the text that guides visual search? We identify a previously overlooked linguistic bottleneck: questions formulated for answering do not necessarily specify the visual evidence required for localization. To address this mismatch, we introduce EviSpec, a training-free compiler that derives complementary evidence specifications while preserving the original question for final reasoning. We further validate it through matched-control experiments that isolate the roles of evidence specification and localization. With the search budget fixed, structured evidence specifications yield an 8.6% relative gain over generic requests. With evidence geometry matched, the evidence localized by EviSpec yields a 14.8% relative gain over random evidence. Together, these controls isolate the benefit of specifying what evidence to seek rather than merely expanding visual access. Across all five MLLMs, EviSpec consistently improves upon the corresponding baseline on each of the three benchmarks, yielding average relative gains of \textbf{10.4%, 8.8%, and 12.4%} on V\textsuperscript{*}Bench, HR-Bench-4K, and HR-Bench-8K, respectively. Beyond high-resolution reasoning, EviSpec also achieves state-of-the-art performance on VQA and hallucination-focused benchmarks.