eess.ASMar 17, 2026
SaveOver-the-air White-box Attack on the Wav2Vec Speech Recognition Neural Network
Organizations: Joint Stock Research and Production Company Kryptonite
Abstract
Automatic speech recognition systems based on neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that alter transcriptions in a malicious way. Recent works in this field have focused on making attacks work in over-the-air scenarios, however such attacks are typically detectable by human hearing, limiting their potential applications. In the present work we explore different approaches of making over-the-air attacks less detectable, as well as the impact these approaches have on the attacks' effectiveness.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Data augmentation.
Figure 2: Example room layout.
Figure 3: Attack generation iteration. Gradient backpropagation is indicated by red arrows.
Figure 4: Audio fragments padded with zeros.
| Experiment | FR | RS | TS | Success rate | PER | WER | Generation time, hrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | + | + | + | 0.00 | 0% | 0.13 | 0.44 | 1.0 |
| 2 | + | + | + | 0.15 | 40% | 0.03 | 0.09 | 11.5 |
| 3 | — | + | + | 0.00 | 0% | 0.20 | 0.45 | 1.4 |
| 4 | — | + | + | 0.15 | 20% | 0.06 | 0.20 | 8.2 |
| 5 | + | — | + | 0.00 | 0% | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.3 |
| 6 | + | — | + | 0.15 | 0% | 0.91 | 0.87 | 1.1 |
Table 1: Experimental results. FR — frequency response, RS — room simulation, TS — time shift.
Figure 5: Numbers of iterations required to reach various values of .
More in this topic
Adversarial Examples
Adversarial examples are inputs crafted to cause machine-learning models to misclassify, misperceive, or generate unsafe outputs.
See all 76 papersWhile voice control is rapidly becoming a ubiquitous vector of human-AI communication, the risks facing these systems remain poorly understood. This is, in part, a product of the difficulties in scaling strictly digital adversarial workflows to the physical world. These scale barriers have led the community to abstract away key acoustic factors relating to detectability and the influence of geometry on acoustics. These methodological and metrological shortcomings undermine our understanding of risk. We illuminate these issues through real-world testing, conceptual discussions, and a novel, high-throughput reality simulation framework. By testing over 8 million adversarial evaluations, we demonstrate that acoustic awareness yields relative Word Error Rate increases of up to 94.5% under Whisper and wav2vec. We employ this framework to explore a formalize and operationalize a Dual-Form Signal to Noise Ratio to decouple source stealth from victim attack efficacy, resolving a crucial limitation in current works. This lays the groundwork for repeatable, verifiable research that embraces, rather than abstracts, the acoustic environment.
Beyond Waveform Robustness: Robust Feature-Vocoder Adversarial Attacks on Automatic Speech Recognition
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems have become widely used for multilingual speech-to-text transcription. Their robustness to adversarial attacks has become an important topic for the community. Existing adversarial attacks directly add adversarial noise to the speech audio. However, prior work has shown that existing adversarial attacks face two limitations: they often transfer poorly to black-box ASR systems and are increasingly mitigated by defenses tailored to input-space perturbations. In this work, we propose a Clean-Referenced Feature-Vocoder Attack, a surrogate-based black-box attack that moves the adversarial search space from raw waveforms to self-supervised learning (SSL) representations. To address the transferability limitation, we perturb more generalizable acoustic-phonetic representations rather than low-level waveform samples, reducing dependence on surrogate-specific waveform gradients and encouraging adversarial perturbations that generalize across ASR systems. To bypass different defenses, we shift the adversarial signal from explicit additive waveform noise to SSL feature-space perturbations and reconstruct them through a vocoder into speech-like waveform adversarial signals, making the resulting samples less aligned with waveform-bounded defenses. Extensive experiments show that, when optimized only on raw Whisper-small as a public surrogate model, our attack transfers effectively to black-box ASR models with a +26.6 WER improvement over the SOTA baseline, while also remaining effective against multiple training defenses with a +36.2 WER improvement. These results reveal a blind spot in current ASR robustness evaluation.
What Was That Again? Certified Robustness for Automatic Speech Recognition
Automatic Speech Recognition systems are notoriously both sensitive to adversarial and benign perturbations. While this has been repeatedly demonstrated using reference datasets, detecting such behaviors in deployed systems is incredibly challenging, due to the absence of oracle knowledge of the true transcription. We demonstrate that employing a certification-inspired mechanism can significantly decrease WER, increase recall, and decrease the Spearman correlation between confidence and WER. We achieve this through a dual-gate diagnostic pipeline: a Two-Sided Atomic Audit that accumulates statistical wealth to certify both token existence and adversarial exclusion, and a Rank-Based Tournament that selects the winning sequence. Our evaluations across four diverse architectures demonstrate up to a 55% relative reduction in Word Error Rate, while also providing granular word- and sentence-level certifications to enhance acoustic security.