Multilingual Reference Need Assessment System for Wikipedia
Authors: Aitolkyn Baigutanova, Francisco Navas, Pablo Aragon, Mykola Trokhymovych, Muniza Aslam, Ai-Jou Chou, Miriam Redi, Diego Saez-Trumper
Organizations: Wikimedia Foundation San Francisco, USA · Wikimedia Foundation Brooklyn, USA · Wikimedia Foundation Barcelona, Spain · Pompeu Fabra University Wikimedia Foundation Barcelona, Spain · Wikimedia Foundation Berlin, Germany · Wikimedia Foundation London, United Kingdom
Wikipedia is a critical source of information for millions of users across the Web. It serves as a key resource for large language models, search engines, question-answering systems, and other Web-based applications. In Wikipedia, content needs to be verifiable, meaning that readers can check that claims are backed by references to reliable sources. This depends on manual verification by editors, an effective but labor-intensive process, especially given the high volume of daily edits. To address this challenge, we introduce a multilingual machine learning system to assist editors in identifying claims requiring citations. Our approach is tested in 10 language editions of Wikipedia, outperforming existing benchmarks for reference need assessment. We not only consider machine learning evaluation metrics but also system requirements, allowing us to explore the trade-offs between model accuracy and computational efficiency under real-world infrastructure constraints. We deploy our system in production and release data and code to support further research.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. The Reference Need pipeline to compute the reference coverage score of an article revision.
Language
Used for training
Active users
Featured articles
Cited sentences
Uncited sentences
English (en)
Yes
122,379
6,508
682,361
511,614
French (fr)
Yes
17,728
2,145
327,240
353,463
German (de)
Yes
17,426
2,848
199,538
685,580
Spanish (es)
Yes
14,257
1,262
162,263
207,601
Russian (ru)
Yes
9,225
1,902
271,976
418,045
Japanese (ja)
No
12,427
92
22,005
14,462
Table 1. Statistics for the top 10 language editions by users.
Figure 2. Proportion of sentences accompanied by a citation in featured articles by language.
Figure 4. Performance and latency comparison. The red dot in all subfigures represents the fine-tuned distil-128 model.
Base model
LM family
Quantize
AUC-ROC
Acc
F1-score
Precision
Recall
Mean latency (s)
Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
LLM
FP16
0.557 ± 0.007
0.521
0.649
0.512
0.886
0.118
Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-Turbo
LLM
FP8
0.595 ± 0.006
0.565
0.564
0.565
0.564
0.110
Llama-3-70b-chat-hf
LLM
FP16
0.607 ± 0.006
0.560
0.642
0.541
0.790
5.268
Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct-Lite
LLM
INT4
0.619 ± 0.006
0.566
0.643
0.546
0.783
3.390
Citation-Needed ( Redi et al., 2019 ) *
SLM
-
0.650
0.590
0.491
0.647
0.395
-
distilbert-128
SLM
torch-INT8
0.750 ± 0.006
0.676
0.696
0.655
0.743
0.023
Table 2. Reference Need model performance sorted by AUC-ROC (the final model is underlined and the best performance values are bolded).
Figure 5. Performance by language using distilbert-128.
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 7. Confusion matrices by language using distil-128 model without optimizations.
In automated fact-checking (AFC), check-worthiness detection identifies claims requiring verification based on domain-specific criteria. On Wikipedia, this task instantiates as Citation Needed Detection (CND), which flags claims lacking supporting citations. However, existing research has largely overlooked lower-resource languages, and recent AFC pipelines rely on large language models (LLMs), which are inaccessible to low-resource organizations. We introduce MCN, a multilingual CND corpus spanning 18 languages across three resource levels, on which we conduct an extensive study of small decoder-based language models (SLMs). Our experiments show that SLMs fine-tuned with an encoder-style objective substantially outperform prompted LLMs across languages. We further present one of the first studies on cross-lingual CND, demonstrating that SLMs fine-tuned solely on English claims surpass LLMs, even with little to no target-language adaptation. Our findings have important implications for lower-resource Wikipedia communities and suggest that compact, task-specific models are preferable to LLMs for CND. We release all data and code at https://github.com/gerritq/mcn
Gerrit Quaremba, Amy Rechkemmer, Elizabeth Black +2
We present a multilingual fact-checking system deployed at Factiverse, designed for high-throughput and low-latency operation across diverse languages. The system follows a modular pipeline with three stages: claim detection, evidence retrieval and re-ranking, and veracity prediction. We fine-tune XLM-RoBERTa-Large for claim detection, mmBERT-base for three-label stance classification (Supports/Refutes/Mixed), and a SetFit-based multilingual re-ranker for claim--evidence matching. We compare these components against strong LLM baselines, including GPT-5.2, Claude Opus~4.6, and Qwen3-8b. Experiments on production data spanning 114 languages for claim detection and 28 languages for veracity prediction show that task-specific fine-tuning provides strong and stable multilingual performance, while the fine-tuned retrieval model remains competitive with modern proprietary embeddings. Same-hardware latency measurements further show large efficiency gains for encoder-based components, supporting their use in production deployments with tight cost and privacy constraints. Overall, compact fine-tuned, self-hosted models remain a practical and effective foundation for multilingual fact-checking at scale. Code and data used for this study are available at https://github.com/factiverse/factcheck-editor.
Pratuat Amatya, Vinay Setty
Factiverse AS and University of Stavanger Stavanger, Norway
Language models increasingly support or automate information retrieval from document collections too large to index. This task is difficult when it requires specialist linguistic or scientific knowledge. We used the Wikipedia Game to test language models on an analogous information retrieval task. In the game, players must reach a target article using only article links. We compared sentence embedding models and LLMs across five Wikipedia languages and five academic-literature datasets. We construct very large local graphs of Wikipedia pages and of paper citations using OpenAlex and provide code to build and navigate them. This allows the study of language models' navigation capabilities without relying on third-party APIs. We compared the models with human and TF-IDF benchmarks. The Wikipedia Game format enables robust comparisons across techniques, languages, and domains. No model significantly outperformed humans, although the best models (GPT-o3 mini, GPT-4o, QwQ:32B, and DeepSeek-R1:70B) achieved comparable success. Performance and rankings varied across languages and topics, with implications for practitioners utilising these techniques.
Alexander Hickey, Joanna Knight, James Bishop
The Alan Turing Institute, 96 Euston Rd., London NW1 2DB, UK